Albert Sembiring
Universitas Padjadjaran

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERAN LEMBAGA PENJAMIN SIMPANAN TERHADAP SALDO UANG ELEKTRONIK PADA DOMPET ELEKTRONIK DANA Yuda Anrova; Albert Sembiring
Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46306/rj.v2i1.20

Abstract

DANA is a technology for electronic wallet or e-wallet that is used for transactions without cash or cards but only with a user's start. That ease and effectiveness led to the high consumption of DANA. But lately electronic wallet users have concerns over the balance on their electronic wallets. Indonesian have Institution Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS) is regulated number 24 of 2004, it provides security and gives its customers confidence in existing systems and institutions. It is still a matter of whether LPS played a part in the transaction. The research aims to see the extent of LPS 'role in transactions in DANA applications. By using descriptive research methods of anaitis by using secondary data of legislation, previous research, and literature. The study shows that LPS has no role in the protection of public money that is kept in the application of DANA because legal regulations do not permit it. The LPS also have no intervention function in policy or financial transaction activities in the fund in DANA
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERKAIT PELELANGAN BARANG SITAAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH KPK (DIKAITKAN DENGAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 105 TAHUN 2021 TENTANG LELANG BENDA SITAAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI) Albert Sembiring; Yohana Br Manik
Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46306/rj.v2i2.49

Abstract

Auction is the sale of goods that are open to the public carried out by/or before the Auction Officer by means of establishing competitive prices and transparency. In the implementation of the auction, there are often obstacles to confiscated goods, including damage, a decrease in economic value, and the cost of confiscation can be too high, so that it can harm the interests of the suspect/defendant as well as the interests of the state. Therefore, Government Regulation Number 105 of 2021 concerning Auction of Confiscated Objects from the Corruption Eradication Commission was made, which allows the KPK to conduct auctions from the investigation stage, so that this provision can be an effective and efficient effort in preventing the above obstacles. The approach method used in this research is normative juridical in the form of analytical descriptive which basically describes the problem being studied, then analyzed with existing legal regulations. The results of the study will show what kinds of goods can be auctioned by the KPK and how the auction is carried out by the KPK