Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Hasanuddin Law Review
Muhammad Syarif Nuh
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tudang Sipulung: A Conflict Resolution Wisdom of Bugis-Makassar Community Nuh, Muhammad Syarif
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2016
Publisher : Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (461.831 KB) | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v1i2.308

Abstract

This article explores local wisdom “tudang sipulung” (seated together), as conflict settlement medium of Bugis-Makassar Community of South Sulawesi, Indonesia.Tudang sipulung is one of the social institutions that owned the Bugis-Makassar South Sulawesi as a conflict resolution. Tudang sipulung was originally only known in the agricultural community in resolving conflicts related to agriculture, and developing relevant social disputes. Formally, this Tudang Sipulung accommodated by Police in South Sulawesi in the form of a forum called the Mabbulo Sibatang Communication Forum (FKMB) to resolve the conflict. FKMB essence is tudang sipulung between the government, the team of FKMB Police, religious leaders, community leaders, the parties to the dispute and sit together in solving the conflict. Some conflicts that have occurred and are resolved through conflict FKMB PTPN XIV Wajo regency with the community District Kera in Wajo regency, Conflict PTPN XIV Takalar with Gowa regency related to land use and conflict Execution University of Al’As’yariah Mandar Polewali Mandar, West Sulawesi, Indonesia.
HAKIKAT PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN PEMERINTAHAN Muhammad Syarif Nuh
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jilid 41, Nomor 1, Tahun 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (137.27 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.41.1.2012.50-58

Abstract

Good governance can only be realized in state law. One of the principle of good governance is the principle of accountability which requires all local governments accountable for their actions in governance. Accountability of local government consisting of political accountability, law and economics. Political accountability, there are two kinds of common liability in the form of regional governance that must be done once a year to the central government as the basic building material evaluation and subsequent local government and governance accountability reports to Parliament and the Government in form the public governanceas a judgment to accept or reject the report of accountability that could result in dismissal of the Local Government and the tremendous responsibility that is required by Parliament in the form requesting the information reported in the local government accountability office that could result in local governments can not be nominated for the next period. Legal liability is a liability for the actions of local governments that harm the public or other parties. Divided into two legal liability personal liability, which focuses on the functional or behavioral approach may result in a severe misuse of authority in the form of maladministration and liability positions that focus on the approach to the legality (validity) regarding the use of authority, procedure and substance. Differences in personal responsibility and liability positions at the consequences of criminal, civil, and administration. Criminal liability only relates to personal responsibility, civil liability relating to both personal responsibility and accountability responsibilities and administrative positions relating to the responsibilities of office. While the economic responsibility held in conjunction with political accountability.Keywords: Government, Governance, Accountability
Co-Authors