Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS ATAS MEREK KOPI TORAJA DAN KOPI GAYO YANG DIDAFTARKAN OLEH NEGARA LAIN Ayu Kumala Sari Hamidi; Iyah Faniyah
UNES Law Review Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ulr.v2i1.60

Abstract

The existence of IPR, especially Geographical Indications and Brands, is the basis of policy making in the world of Trade. Indonesia is a country that is rich in potential Geographical Indication products and then Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Geographical Indications and brands for National Regulations and in TRIPS as International Arrangements. but there are still violations of cases regarding Geographical Indications and Trademarks and occur in Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee. The formulation of the problem in this research is how is the trademark legal law for Geographical Indications in the case of Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee registered by other countries? How is the legal settlement of the Violation of Brand Geographical Indications carried out by other Countries against Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee?The specification of this study is Descriptive Analysis. The approach is a normative juridical approach using secondary data obtained through library studies. The data is then analyzed qualitatively and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. Based on the results of research and analysis, answers can be obtained: 1) Legal protection against Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee registered by other countries, namely by registering the trademark to the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights and after obtaining a Geographical Indication certificate from the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights, the geographical indication of a product's brand it gets strong protection. 2) Legal settlement of brand violations and geographical indications of the brand of Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee are litigation methods carried out through the Commercial Court institution, for Toraja Coffee to be carried out at the Ujung Pandang Commercial Court and Gayo Coffee at the Medan Commercial Court.
DEVELOPMENT OF AN ONLINE TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT MONITORING SYSTEM: GOOGLE CASE STUDY AYU KUMALA SARI HAMIDI; SUNNY UMMUL FIRDAUS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTI SCIENCE Vol. 5 No. 01 (2025): INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTISCIENCE - JANUARY-APRIL 2025
Publisher : CV KULTURA DIGITAL MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Online marketing or often called digital marketing is marketing with the concept of promoting products or services through internet-based media, one of which is a website. Digital transformation has brought new opportunities and challenges to brand protection, particularly in the online space. Trademark infringement across digital platforms, including search engines like Google, is becoming increasingly common and requires innovative and integrated solutions. This article discusses the development of a technology-based monitoring system to detect and resolve online trademark infringement, focusing on a case study of Google's infringement policies and mechanisms. This research utilizes a normative legal analysis method with a case study approach. The results show that artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies and machine learning algorithms can improve the effectiveness of infringement detection. However, challenges such as cross-country regulatory inconsistencies, lack of algorithmic transparency, and limited reporting processes remain major obstacles. The study recommends strengthening international regulations, enhancing cooperation among stakeholders, and developing comprehensive surveillance technologies to create a sustainable brand protection ecosystem in the digital age.
Indonesian Migrant Workers: A Study of International Legal Protections and Their Relevance to SDGs Point 8 Yokhebed Arumdika Probosambodo; Josef Purwadi Setiodjati; Ayu Kumala Sari Hamidi
Journal Customary Law Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): September
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/jcl.v2i4.4866

Abstract

The phenomenon of Indonesian migrant workers reflects a critical nexus between labor migration, international law, and sustainable development. Indonesia is among the world’s largest labor-sending countries, with millions of its citizens employed abroad, particularly in the Middle East and Asia. Remittances from migrant workers provide substantial economic benefits for the state and households, yet these workers often face systemic vulnerabilities including exploitation, discrimination, and inadequate legal protection. This article examines the extent to which international law and Indonesia’s national legal framework safeguard the rights of migrant workers while contributing to the realization of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth. International instruments such as the 1990 International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and their Families (ICRMW) and relevant ILO conventions provide comprehensive standards, but their effectiveness is constrained by limited ratification from key receiving states. At the domestic level, Indonesia has enacted Law No. 18 of 2017 on the Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers (UU PPMI), which represents a shift toward state responsibility and alignment with international human rights norms. Nevertheless, implementation challenges ranging from weak enforcement and bureaucratic overlap to insufficient diplomatic support abroad remain significant. The findings suggest that while Indonesia has made normative progress, practical protection is hindered by governance gaps and lack of cooperation from host countries. Strengthening enforcement, regional collaboration, and worker empowerment are crucial to ensuring that Indonesian migrant workers achieve genuine “decent work” as envisioned by SDG 8.
Indonesian Migrant Workers: A Study of International Legal Protections and Their Relevance to SDGs Poin 8 Yokhebed Arumdika Probosambodo; Josef Purwadi Setiodjati; Ayu Kumala Sari Hamidi
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i3.2409

Abstract

The phenomenon of Indonesian migrant workers reflects a critical nexus between labor migration, international law, and sustainable development. Indonesia is among the world’s largest labor-sending countries, with millions of its citizens employed abroad, particularly in the Middle East and Asia. Remittances from migrant workers provide substantial economic benefits for the state and households, yet these workers often face systemic vulnerabilities including exploitation, discrimination, and inadequate legal protection. This article examines the extent to which international law and Indonesia’s national legal framework safeguard the rights of migrant workers while contributing to the realization of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth. International instruments such as the 1990 International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and their Families (ICRMW) and relevant ILO conventions provide comprehensive standards, but their effectiveness is constrained by limited ratification from key receiving states. At the domestic level, Indonesia has enacted Law No. 18 of 2017 on the Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers (UU PPMI), which represents a shift toward state responsibility and alignment with international human rights norms. Nevertheless, implementation challenges ranging from weak enforcement and bureaucratic overlap to insufficient diplomatic support abroad remain significant. The findings suggest that while Indonesia has made normative progress, practical protection is hindered by governance gaps and lack of cooperation from host countries. Strengthening enforcement, regional collaboration, and worker empowerment are crucial to ensuring that Indonesian migrant workers achieve genuine “decent work” as envisioned by SDG 8.