Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Students' Barriers in Learning English Through Online Learning Ifna Nifriza; Desfi Yenti
Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal Vol 5 No 1 (2021): Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (484.021 KB) | DOI: 10.31539/leea.v5i1.3013

Abstract

This study aims to identify student barriers in learning English through online learning in class X SMKN 3 Payakumbuh. This research method is descriptive qualitative. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. The questionnaire used as a data source consists of 32 items. The results showed that the barriers faced by students included understanding language, language anxiety, adaptation struggle, diverting attention to the other side, technical issues, cost of online education implementation, technological competence and computer literacy. In conclusion, there are 8 barriers faced by students in learning English through online learning. Understanding language is the most common barriers faced by students, while the least barriers faced by students is computer literacy. Keywords: Online Learning, Student Barriers
Students' Barriers in Learning English Through Online Learning Ifna Nifriza; Desfi Yenti
Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal Vol 5 No 1 (2021): Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal
Publisher : Institut Penelitian Matematika, Komputer, Keperawatan, Pendidikan dan Ekonomi (IPM2KPE)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31539/leea.v5i1.3013

Abstract

This study aims to identify student barriers in learning English through online learning in class X SMKN 3 Payakumbuh. This research method is descriptive qualitative. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. The questionnaire used as a data source consists of 32 items. The results showed that the barriers faced by students included understanding language, language anxiety, adaptation struggle, diverting attention to the other side, technical issues, cost of online education implementation, technological competence and computer literacy. In conclusion, there are 8 barriers faced by students in learning English through online learning. Understanding language is the most common barriers faced by students, while the least barriers faced by students is computer literacy. Keywords: Online Learning, Student Barriers
ANALYSIS OF INHIBITING FACTORS, COMPARATIVE PATTERNS, AND METHODOLOGICAL GAPS OF LACK OF INTEREST IN ENGLISH PROGRAM: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW Ridianto Ridianto; Riyadi Saputra; Multi Efrini; Roza Susanti; Desfi Yenti; Muhammad Yazid Fakhri
ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy)
Publisher : Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36665/elp.v11i2.1196

Abstract

         This study aims to identify the dominant factors inhibiting prospective students' interest in an English Program, compare this pattern of low interest with other study programs, and uncover theoretical and methodological gaps in measuring the construct of "lack of interest." A systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 protocol was conducted on the Scopus database, resulting in 53 primary studies from 2020–2026 that were analyzed thematically. The findings reveal four levels of inhibiting factors: individual (e.g., low self-efficacy), interpersonal (e.g., family expectations), institutional (e.g., inaccurate information), and macro-structural (e.g., negative career perceptions). The lack of interest in the English Program is unique due to a combination of low perceived economic value, gender stereotypes affecting both genders, and a higher perceived technological threat compared to STEM, economics, or health programs. A major gap is the absence of a standardized instrument that measures "lack of interest" as an independent construct. The study concludes that "major avoidance" deserves more scholarly attention, and recommends developing a dedicated instrument and conducting further cross-contextual empirical research.