Yupi Royani
Pusat Data dan Dokumentasi Ilmiah - LIPI

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KONSERVASI HUTAN PADA JURNAL BIOLOGI INDONESIA PERIODE 2010-2020: SEBUAH STUDI BIBLIOMETRIK Yupi Royani; Rochani Nani Rahayu
VISI PUSTAKA: Buletin Jaringan Informasi Antar Perpustakaan Vol 23, No 2: Agustus 2021
Publisher : Perpustakaan Nasional RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37014/visipustaka.v23i2.1229

Abstract

A bibliometric analysis was carried out on the Indonesian Biology Journal for the period 2010 – 2020, with the aim of knowing 1) the distribution of keywords to see the description of the research published in the Indonesian Biology Journal 2010-2020; 2) article classification; 3) distribution of articles by year; 4) distribution of articles by issue number; 5) authorship pattern; 6) the most prolific writer; 7) affiliations of authors who contribute to the Indonesian Biology Journal; 8) the type of document used as a reference in the Indonesian Biology Journal 2010-2020. The bibliometric method was used, and the data was taken from the Indonesian Biology Journal from 2010 to 2020, which was downloaded via the address https://e-journal.biologi.lipi.go.id/index.php/jurnal_biologi_indonesia. Furthermore, the analysis of the distribution of articles based on keywords, distribution of class numbers, distribution of articles by year, distribution of articles by number of publications, pattern of authorship, most productive authors, pattern of authorship affiliation was carried out. Based on the results and discussion, it can be concluded that during 2010-2020, 315 article titles have been published and there are 1,343 keywords. Of the 50 most keywords, the keyword Biodiversity often appears 21 times (1.56%) then Genetic variation and Wildlife conservation each 20 times (1.48%), then Animal population 18 times (1.34 %), followed by Plant conservation 17 times (1.19%) and Animal conservation 16 times (1.19%). Next is Feeds and Plant growth substances each with 15 (1.11%), then In vitro culture and Plant diversity each with 14 (1.04%). Next, Vegetation is 13 (0.90%), followed by Habitat conservation and Plant species, each with 11 (0.82%). On the order of 50 keywords Drought resistance, with a total of 4 (0.29%). The highest class is class 635 with a frequency of 35 (11.11%). Articles written by a single author (71 titles; 22.54%) and articles written by collaboration (244 titles; 77.46%). the least number of articles published is in 2020, which is 1 article title (3,17). For issue number 1 starting from volume 6 to volume 16, 164 article titles have been published (52.06%). As for number 2 with the same volume, there were 151 article titles (47.94%). The most prolific writer is Hellen Kurniati with 13 writings, followed by Wartika Rosa Farida with 12 writings and then Witjaksono with 11 writings. Then Andri Permata Sari, Niken Tunjung Murti Pratiwi, NLP. Indi Dharmayanti, Tri Muji Ermayanti with 10 each, followed by Didik Widyatmoko and Risa Indriani with 9 each, Atit Kanti and Yopi with 7 each and Dwi Astuti, Eko Sulistyadi, Ibnu Maryanto, Inna Puspa Ayu each. 6 posts. LIPI is the first institution that contributes the most articles, with a frequency of 260 times. It is known that 7,354 document titles are used as references and the journal is in the first order of cited documents, with 4,591 titles (62.42%).
PERSEPSI PENELITI TENTANG PERPUSTAKAAN BERKELANJUTAN DI LIPI KAWASAN PUSPIPTEK SERPONG (RESEARCHERS PERCEPTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE LIBRARY IN LIPI AREA OF PUSPIPTEK SERPONG) Yupi Royani; Rahartri Rahartri
VISI PUSTAKA: Buletin Jaringan Informasi Antar Perpustakaan Vol 22, No 2: Agustus 2020
Publisher : Perpustakaan Nasional RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37014/visipustaka.v22i2.958

Abstract

This study aims to determine the perceptions of the heads of work units and LIPI researchers about the existence and sustainability of libraries in the LIPI Puspiptek Serpong. The study uses descriptive qualitative methods with interview techniques. More in-depth information was collected from the participants, namely the heads of work units and researchers related to the sustainability of the library in the LIPI Puspiptek Serpong. Based on the results and discussions, it was concluded that the library in the LIPI Puspiptek Serpong is still needed both in conventional and digital form because of its function as a repository of knowledge and information sources. As well as its benefits for the community as a place to get information and for researchers to support their research. The library is still needed because as a place to store a collection of books of historical value, management for tacit knowledge (knowledge about research operations) that is not transferred into the finished form such as: books, theses, papers, and as a place of learning for the public. The hope for the LIPI Serpong Library is the realization of an integrated library, where the collections in each work unit are collected into a strategic location. LIPI Serpong library must be able to provide comfort for users.