Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.155
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi dan Perubahan Sosial Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal Polit Journal
Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Department of Theory and History of State and Law, Omsk State University Dostoevsky, Omsk, Russia
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Social Sciences

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

 1   2 
About Local Rules of Law of Modern Russian Legislation Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences, February
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR) Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/biohs.v3i1.359

Abstract

This scientific article is devoted to the problems of local norms of modern Russian law: its features, necessity and classification. Attention is drawn to those local rules of law that must necessarily be in enterprises. It is noted that the scope of the former is not limited only to the scope of labor law.
On the Issue of the Substitution of Concepts in Determining the Subjects of the Political System of Society (Based on a Critical Analysis of Modern Legal Literature on the Theory of State and Law) Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi dan Perubahan Sosial Vol 7 No 3 (2020): Konfrontasi, September
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/konfrontasi2.v7i3.118

Abstract

This scientific article is devoted to some theoretical problems of the theory of the political system of society. The purpose of the article is to show the true, objective position in relation to the subjects of the political system. To solve this goal, the following tasks were set: a critical analysis of the opinions of those authors who consider as such: 1) criminal communities; 2) public organizations with an insignificant political aspect. Moreover, both in the first and in the second case, it has been proven that scientists are engaged in the substitution of concepts, that is, they commit a logical error. Result: 1) criminal associations are not subjects of the political system of society; 2) according to the political criterion, it is necessary to distinguish only proper political and not proper political organizations; 3) general theoretical provisions, opposite to those stated, differing in illogicality, do not contribute to improving the quality of educational literature on the theory of state and law.
About Some Actual Problems of the Methodology of Research of State Legal Phenomena Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi dan Perubahan Sosial Vol 7 No 4 (2020): Konfrontasi, December
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/konfrontasi2.v7i4.125

Abstract

This scientific article is devoted to the consideration of some methodological problems of the study of state and legal phenomena. The main purpose of the work is to draw the attention of the scientific community to those general theoretical methodological issues that are ambiguously solved by scientists and which are important for legal science. To achieve this goal during the study, the following tasks were solved: 1) substantiate the importance and necessity of the general philosophical method; 2) to argue the unacceptability of the religious and moral approach to the study of state and legal reality; 3) dialectically assess such a methodological principle as the principle of scientific pluralism. In conclusion, it is concluded that, firstly, that general philosophical methods, in particular and especially the method of dialectical and historical materialism, which form the methodological basis for the scientific study of state-legal phenomena, should not be ignored, because they reveal the most general laws of the movement of human thought to the truth, concentrating all the most important and essential that is contained in other methods; secondly, the religious philosophy of believers should not be included in the potential of the methodology of cognition of state and legal reality; thirdly, the methodological principle of scientific pluralism must have appropriate boundaries.
Political Regime or State (State-Law) Regime? Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics Vol 1 No 4 (2021): Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, November
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/polit.v1i4.545

Abstract

The article emphasizes and substantiates the leading place of the political (state, state-legal) regime in the system of elements of the state form. Attention is paid to the correlation of political, state and state-legal regime, emphasizing that the latter characterizes democratic states.
On the Consolidation of Normative Legal Acts in the Russian Federation Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics Vol 2 No 1 (2022): Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, February
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/polit.v2i1.628

Abstract

The scientific article analyzes such a form of systematization of regulatory legal acts in the Russian Federation as their consolidation. Attention is drawn to the problem of the correlation between codification and consolidation of legal acts. It is noted that this form of systematization has a very limited distribution in Russia in comparison with foreign (France, Great Britain, Germany, USA) countries, in which the consolidation of normative legal acts is understood somewhat differently than in Russian legal science.
On Legal Consciousness: Based on a Critical Analysis of Legal Literature Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics Vol 2 No 4 (2022): Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, November
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/polit.v2i4.773

Abstract

This article is devoted to the classification of legal consciousness, which is based on a critical analysis of modern legal literature. The paper provides a reasoned author’s view of the specified theoretical problem.
On the Methodology of Modern Russian Law Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics Vol 3 No 1 (2023): Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, February
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/polit.v3i1.869

Abstract

An analysis of modern Russian literature made it possible to identify two equally negative tendencies in the methodology of jurisprudence. The first is that legal scholars pay little attention to methodology; the second is in attempts to introduce new methods into the methodology that are not used in practice.
On the Concept of Procedural Responsibility: General Theoretical Analysis Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics Vol 3 No 4 (2023): Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, November
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/polit.v3i4.1013

Abstract

This article examines the concept of procedural responsibility. The position is defended according to which procedural responsibility is interpreted not as a type of legal responsibility, but as a complex legal institution consisting of the norms of both substantive and procedural law. In turn, procedural responsibility is divided into a number of sub-institutions, including criminal procedural responsibility, which is analyzed in more or less detail.
Doctrinal (Conceptual) Errors: General Theoretical Aspect Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics Vol 5 No 1 (2025): Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, February
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/polit.v5i1.1268

Abstract

This scientific article examines the problem of the relationship between doctrinal (conceptual) and law-making legal errors. The concept of legal error is considered and its symptoms are analyzed. Attention is paid to the characteristics of doctrinal errors, their characteristics, among which the most important is their political and ideological nature. Analysis of the legal literature made it possible to identify two approaches to solving the problem posed. Proponents of the first approach, both representatives of the general theory of law and branch sciences, believe that doctrinal errors are types of law-making errors. Being embodied in a normative legal act, they are also law-making errors. The author supports the more substantiated position of supporters of the second approach, who, distinguishing between doctrinal and law-making errors, believe that the first can arise at the stage of the process of cognition of objective laws that lie outside the law-making process; that doctrinal errors are a prerequisite for law-making errors. In conclusion, attention is drawn to the important role of legal science in preventing doctrinal errors.
Concepts and Categories of the General Theory of Law as a Legal, Methodological Science Vladimir Valentinovich Kozhevnikov
Polit Journal Scientific Journal of Politics Vol 5 No 2 (2025): Polit Journal: Scientific Journal of Politics, May
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR-Publisher)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/polit.v5i2.1276

Abstract

The main problem in the article is to determine the significance of the conceptual and categorical apparatus of the general theory of law from the point of view of cognition of legal phenomena and processes. Its solution necessarily presupposes the solution of the following goals: 1) determination of the methodological role of legal concepts and categories; 2) substantiation of a) the relationship between legal concepts and legal categories; b) legal and doctrinal legal concepts. As a result of the research, the author came to the following conclusions: 1) concepts and categories are not an independent method of cognition or a part of it; 2) legal concepts and legal categories should be distinguished; 3) doctrinal concepts should be guided by legal (official) definitions.
Co-Authors Muhammad Ridwan