Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Pengaruh Lokasi, Produk, Citra Merek dan Promosi Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Mobil Suzuki (Studi Kasus di PT Gedong Jembar Pemalang) Hartoyo Hartoyo; Santi Suciningtyas
JBIMA (Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen) Vol 4 No 2 (2016): JBIMA (Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen)
Publisher : Universitas Peradaban

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research entitle the “ Analysis of influence location, product, brand image, and promotion to purchase decision Suzuki car” (Case Study in PT. Gedong Jembar Pemalang)”. This research target is : first, to know and analyse influence of location variable to purchase decision Suzuki car variable, second, to know and analyse influence of product variable to purchase decision Suzuki car variable, third, to know and analyse influence of brand image variable to purchase decision Suzuki car variable, fourth, to know and analyse influence of promotion variable to purchase decision Suzuki car variable, fifth, to know and analyse influence of location variable, product variable, brand image variable, and promotion variable to purchase decision Suzuki car variable. At this research used by sample as much 90 respondents that is some of customer PT. Gedong Jembar Pemalang. As for examination of at this research done with validity test, reliability, classical assumptions, multiple linear regression analysis and hypothesis test in the form of t test and F test. With multiple linear regression analysis at this research obtained by result b1 = 0,237 showing influence which are significance of location variable (X1) equal 0,237 to purchase decision Suzuki car, b2 = 0,188 showing influence which are significance of product variable (X2) equal 0,188 to purchase decision Suzuki car, b3 = 0,177 showing influence which are significance of brand image variable (X3) equal 0,177 to purchase decision Suzuki car, b4 = 0,441 showing influence which are significance of promotion variable (X4) equal 0,441 to purchase decision Suzuki car. While for the hypothesis examination in partial used by t test, obtained by value tcount for location variable (X1) equal to 3,080, product variable (X2) equal to 3,059, brand image variable (X3) equal to 2,716, promotion variable (X4) equal to 2,716 with criterion of ttables of equal to 1,987 used in this examination. And for examination as a whole be used by F test. Be obtained by F count equal to 32,641 with level significance of 0,000 far smaller than 0,05 and bigger than Ftable of equal to 2,48. Coefficient determinant (R2) equal to 60,6%, what mean that purchase decision Suzuki car together be influenced by location variable, product variable, brand image variable, and promotion variable, while the remaining equal to 39,3% influenced by other variables that are not included in the model equations.
ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KINERJA PEGAWAI Siti Masrokhah; Santi Suciningtyas
Neraca Vol. 12 No. 2 (2016): NERACA
Publisher : FEB Universitas Muhammadiyah Pekajangan Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.48144/neraca.v12i2.454

Abstract

This research title is “ Analysis of influence discipline, environment job, training education to employee performance” (Case Study in Department of Cooperatives, UKM, Trade and Industry Pemalang Regency)”. This research target is : first, to know and analyse influence of discipline variable to employee performance variable, second, to know and analyse influence of environment job variable to employee performance variable, third, to know and analyse influence of education and training variable to employee performance variable, fourth, to know and analyse influence of discipline variable, environment job variable, training education variable to employee performance variable. With multiple linear regression analysis at this research obtained by result b1 = 0,290 showing influence which are significance of discipline variable (X1) equal 0,290 to employee performance, b2 = 0,118 showing influence which are significance of environment job variable (X2) equal 0,118 to employee performance, b3 = 0,672 showing influence which are significance of training education variable (X3) equal 0,672 to employee performance. While for the hypothesis examination in parcial used by t test, obstaned by value tcount for discipline variable (X1) equal to 4,269, environment job variable (X2) equal to 2,440, training education variable (X3) equal to 8,216 with criterion of ttables of equal to 1,996 used in this examination. And for examination as a whole be used by F test. Be obtained by F count equal to 33,637 with level significance of 0,000 far smaller than 0,05 and bigger than Ftable of equal to 2,75. Coefficient determinant (R2) equal to 60,8%, what mean that employee performance together be influenced by discipline variable, environment job variable, training education variable, while the remaining equal to 39,2% influenced by other variables that are not included in the model equations.