Sodikin Sodikin
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

EKSISTENSI PENYIDIK PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL (PPNS) DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELANGGARAN TATA RUANG Sodikin Sodikin
Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol 6, No 2 (2017): Agustus 2017
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i2.169

Abstract

Salah satu institusi yang diberi wewenang untuk melakukan penegakan hukum dalam bidang penataan ruang adalah Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS). Penyidik PPNS menjadi suatu institusi yang kewenangannya sama dengan penyidik Kepolisian RI dalam hal terjadinya tindak pidana penataan ruang yang oleh Undang-Undang telah diberikan kewenangannya untuk menyidik pelanggaran hukum tata ruang. Permasalahan yang diangkat pada penelitian ini terkait dengan eksistensi pelaksanaan tugas PPNS dalam melakukan penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran tata ruang. Dengan metode penelitian deskriptif normatif dapat disimpulkan bahwa pemerintah masih belum berupaya untuk menciptakan penataan ruang yang nyaman dan menumbuhkan kesadaran masyarakat, serta tidak adanya politik pemerintah dalam rangka memperbaiki dan memperkuat eksistensi PPNS Penataan Ruang. Oleh karena itu, perlu ada upaya oleh pemerintah untuk memperkuat eksistensi PPNS di bidang penataan ruang seperti membuat perangkat peraturan perundang-undangan lebih rinci, fasilitas yang memadai, program kerja yang terencana, mempersiapkan personil/anggota PPNS penataan ruang yang profesional.  
Over The Limit of Authority of The Constitutional Court In Resolving Disputes About The Results of The General Election Sodikin Sodikin
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 10, No 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i2.1087

Abstract

The limits of authority possessed by the Constitutional Court in deciding disputes regarding the results of general elections as stipulated in Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution have given a narrow interpretation which is to assess the difference in the figures set by the KPU. The limited authority of the Constitutional Court has caused the decline in the quality of elections. The Constitutional Court does not dare to take on its broader authority even though its position as guardian of the constitution as well as the guardian of democracy. The wider authority of the Constitutional Court needs to be given that every election will always be followed by violations and fraud.
Over The Limit of Authority of The Constitutional Court In Resolving Disputes About The Results of The General Election Sodikin Sodikin
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 10 No. 2: August 2022 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v10i2.1087

Abstract

The limits of authority possessed by the Constitutional Court in deciding disputes regarding the results of general elections as stipulated in Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution have given a narrow interpretation which is to assess the difference in the figures set by the KPU. The limited authority of the Constitutional Court has caused the decline in the quality of elections. The Constitutional Court does not dare to take on its broader authority even though its position as guardian of the constitution as well as the guardian of democracy. The wider authority of the Constitutional Court needs to be given that every election will always be followed by violations and fraud.