Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SOEPRA Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan
Endang Widyorini
Magister Hukum Kesehatan Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata Semarang
Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Kawasan Tanpa Rokok (KTR) Sebagai Bagian Dari Perilaku Hidup Bersih Dan Sehat (PHBS) Di Lingkungan Pendidikan (Studi Kasus Pada STIKES Di Kota Semarang) Yana Agus Setianingsih; Endang Wahyati Yustina; Endang Widyorini
SOEPRA Vol 1, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (186.365 KB) | DOI: 10.24167/shk.v1i1.1290

Abstract

Kebijakan KTR dibuat oleh Pemerintah yang bertujuan untuk menyeimbangkan hak perokok dan hak atas kesehatan. kebijakan KTR berkaitan dengan perilaku hidup bersih dan sehat (PHBS) yang memiliki tujuan sama yaitu untuk memperoleh derajat kesehatan yang maksimal. STIKES merupakan lingkungan pendidikan bidang kesehatan yang dapat menjadi ujung tombak terlaksananya kebijakan KTR.Metode pendekatan yang digunakan yuridis sosiologis, spesifikasi penelitian menggunakan deskriptif analitis. Aspek yuridis yang diteliti adalah ketentuan hukum tentang Kebijakan KTR dan PHBS. Aspek sosiologis yang diteliti yaitu pelaksanaan kebijakan KTR sebagai bagian dari PHBS di STIKES Kota Semarang. Kebijakan KTR di Kota Semarang diatur dalam Peraturan Bersama Menteri Kesehatan dan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 188 dan 7 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kawasan Tanpa Rokok, Peraturan Daerah Nomor 3 tahun 2013 tentang Kawasan tanpa rokok. Pelaksanaan kebijakan KTR di STIKES Kota Semarang telah dilaksanakan berdasarkan ketentuan perundang-undangan, namun belum optimal dikarenakan belum adanya peraturan internal dan sanksi belum ditegakkan.
Midwife’s Role in The Implementation of The Health Minister’s Regulation Number 66 of 2014 Through Stimulation, Early Detection and Intervention Activities to Child’s Growth Disruption at Public Health Centers of Yogyakarta City Ni Luh Gede Wira Yanti; Endang Widyorini; Bernadeta Resti Nurhayati
SOEPRA Vol 5, No 1: Juni 2019
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (154.5 KB) | DOI: 10.24167/shk.v5i1.1500

Abstract

Every child had the rights to survive, grow, and well develop to perfect adulthood.However, many children with special needs were factually ignored by their families even theywere often considered as family’s disgrace. The government, through midwives, could play arole in minimising the risks experienced by children with special needs by doing stimulation,early detection and intervention to child’s growth disruption.This research usedsocio‐legal approach with the analytical‐descriptive specification. Primarydata were obtained from interviews with Head of Health Centers (Puskesmas) of Mergangsan,Jetis and Tegalrejo beside with midwives, integrated service post (posyandu) cadres, and fiveparents of children with special needs. Secondary data were obtained from books and legalmaterials related to the research. The data were then qualitatively analysed.The results showed that the three Health Centers (Puskesmas), namelyMergangsan, Jetis andTegalrejo, had implemented the Health Minister’s Regulation Nr. 66 of 2014. The HealthCenters had programs having relations with child’s growth that was SDIDTK (stimulation, earlydetection and intervention of growth disruption). Midwives had performed their roles instimulation, early detection and intervention of growth disruption thorough examination thatwas monthly conducted together with posyandu’s activities at the Health Centers.Supporting factors of the monitoring implementation of a child’s growth, development anddevelopment disruption included health care facilities, adequate human resources (healthworkers), affordable posyandu’s costs and cross‐sectorial cooperation. The inhibiting factorswere low‐income family’s supports, unfavourable social and economic conditions and mother'sknowledge that remained poor.
Co-Authors Bernadeta Resti Nurhayati Ni Luh Gede Wira Yanti Yana Agus Setianingsih Yustina, Endang Wahyati