p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Atalim Atalim
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

TANGGUNG JAWAB BADAN USAHA PERDAGANGAN MELALUI SISTEM ELEKTRONIK DALAM HAL TERJADINYA WANPRESTASI (STUDI KASUS: LAZADA VS ACHMAD SUPARDI) Nicolas Nicolas; Atalim Atalim
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17139

Abstract

Recently, the internet is a very important medium in everyday life and provides many benefits, one of which is the emergence of e-commerce. E-commerce itself uses the internet as a medium to provide information about certain goods being sold, such as descriptions of goods, pictures of goods sold, until the price is set by the seller. Although there are many advantages or benefits that people get from buying and selling online or e-commerce, it is not impossible for problems to arise. That arise is a problem in the agreement in the form of default. This default occurred when Achmad Supardi bought 4 motorbikes that were quite cheap, the money had been transferred by Achmad Supardi, but the transaction was canceled by Lazada and the money paid was only replaced in the form of vouchers. After the compensation was given by Lazada, there was a problem, namely the form of compensation provided by Lazada did not match the form that was first transferred by Achmad Supardi. To answer this problem, the writer uses normative research, descriptive research, and secondary data. So the result of this research is the lack of responsibility from Lazada to Achmad Supardi in compensation. Therefore, there is a need for guidelines for transactions in e-commerce.
ANALISIS PENERAPAN PENGALIHAN HAK TAGIH PADA PT BAMBANG DJAJA DAN PT HAVANNA TEGUH PERTIWI DALAM PUTUSAN 08/PDT.SUSPKPU/2020/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST Rehulina Dianingwati; Atalim Atalim
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17141

Abstract

The transfer of claim rights is regulated in the Civil Code. Article 613 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code contains regulations regarding things that must be done in committing violations. In this case, PKPU I Petitioners and PKPU II Petitioners feel that the PKPU Respondent has been harmed because the PKPU Respondent is not subject to debt until maturity. Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment Obligation (PKPU) Respondents always have good intentions to pay their debts to PKPU I Petitioners and PKPU II Petitioners even though the time has passed. However, there is a cessie in the settlement of this PKPU so that the Legal Consultants of the PKPU I Petitioners and PKPU II Petitioners indirectly become third parties in this case where the status is questionable. By using a cessie in this case, it will indirectly lead to simplicity in this case and the PKPU Respondent's danger because the debtor can default.