Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ius Constituendum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
Darminto Hartono
Diponegoro University
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
ASPEK HUKUM PRAKTIK INSIDER TRADING TERHADAP INVESTOR DALAM PASAR MODAL DI INDONESIA Firman Habib Patrianto; Darminto Hartono
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol 6, No 1 (2021): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v6i1.2467

Abstract

AbstrakTujuan kajian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kelemahan apa yang ada dalam Undang-Undang Pasar Modal, sehingga pejabat berwenang dapat melakukan rekontruksi terhadap celah hukum tersebut. Pasar modal merupakan suatu sarana yang disediakan dalam rangka mencari sumber pembiayaan maupun sebagai sarana investasi yang melibatkan seluruh potensi dana masyarakat, dalam pelaksanaannya ditemukan celah sehingga muncul kejahatan dalam kegiatan pasar modal atau yang disebut Insider Trading. kejahatan ini tentunya merugikan investor dalam ber investasi sehingga perlunya dilakukan perlindungan hukum. Rumusan masalah yang akan dikaji secara mendalam yaitu sejauhmana pengaturan tentang investor pada praktik insider trading dalam bidang pasar modal di Indonesia dan perlindungan investor dalam praktik insider trading dalam bidang pasar modal di Indonesia. Kajian pendekatan yang digunakan adalah Yuridis Sosiologis sehingga data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder dengan teknik pengumpulan kepustakaan. Hasil kajian yang dilakuakn diantaranya peraturan yang melarangan Insider Trading terdapat celah hukum pada regulasi tersebut, dan Upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap investor ketika terjadi insider trading berdasarkan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan pasar modal, perlindungan tersebut melalui sistem Auto rejection dan gugatan secara perdata.Kata kunci: Insider Trading, Investor, Pasar Modal,
Analysis of the Preah Vihear Temple Dispute in the Perspective of International Law on the Acquisition of State Territorial Sovereignty Darminto Hartono; Anisyah Rani
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6495

Abstract

The Preah Vihear Temple dispute between Thailand and Cambodia is one of the most complex examples of border conflicts in Southeast Asia, which have lasted for more than six decades. The dispute stemmed from differences in interpretation of French colonial maps and claims of sovereignty over the area around the temple. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 1962 designated the Preah Vihear Temple as part of Cambodian territory, but tensions continued until finally in 2013, the ICJ reaffirmed Cambodia's sovereignty over the entire temple grounds. This study analyzes the dispute from the perspective of international law on the acquisition of territorial sovereignty, highlighting the principles of estoppel, acquiescence, and uti possidetis juris. It was found that settlement through international adjudication mechanisms provides strong legal legitimacy to Cambodia's claims, while affirming the importance of respect for the boundaries of colonial heritage in accordance with the principles of international law. This dispute also highlights the need to protect the world's cultural heritage in the midst of conflicts between countries.
The Legality of Alfamart Acquisition of Lawson: Driving Into the Process With a GMS Darminto Hartono; Anisyah Rani
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.6496

Abstract

Acquisition is a form of corporate action that has a significant impact on the control structure in a company and generally requires the approval of the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) as stipulated in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (UUPT). However, in practice, not all acquisitions follow this normative flow. This study discusses the legality of the acquisition process carried out by Alfamart against Lawson without going through the GMS mechanism. Using a juridical-normative approach, this article analyzes the provisions of the UUPT and derivative regulations from the Financial Services Authority (OJK), especially POJK Number 17/POJK.04/2020 and POJK Number 42/POJK.04/2020. The results of the study show that even though it did not go through the GMS, the acquisition was still legally valid because it met the exception requirements, namely the transaction value is below 50% of the total equity and the affiliate relationship does not cause a conflict of interest. Thus, Alfamart's actions have been in accordance with the applicable positive legal provisions and reflect the flexibility of the law in modern corporate practice
Co-Authors Anisyah Rani Firman Habib Patrianto