Mahditia Paramita
Master In Leadership And Policy Innovation, Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

PARADOKS DESENTRALISASI PERUMAHAN DI INDONESIA STUDI KASUS KOTA PALEMBANG DAN KOTA PEKALONGAN Paramita, Mahditia
Jurnal Kawistara Vol 4, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (239.445 KB)

Abstract

Housing decentralization not only positions housing sector as regional obligatory, but also triggerspublic expectations upon the improvement of housing conditions. Various weaknesses of centralizedsystem that full of generalization in housing policy makes decentralized system is interpreted as aninnovative renewal process. However, the central government still does a lot of intervention towardhousing program. Limitation happens to local government such as limitation in housing finance,weakness in coordination ability, and less established of local bureaucracy makes intervention fromcentral government in housing program financed by APBN always dominates. The least contributionfrom local government on public housing sector in decentralization era creates paradox. It is caused bythe Ministry of Public Housing (Kemenpera) that cannot perform fully as substitutional institution rolein managing housing in local area. Kemenpera position as ministerial cluster 3 makes them does nothave representative office in local area. Thus, there will be potential of a repeat experience in the past, inform of generalization in housing policy, that complicates the housing problems itself.
PARADOKS DESENTRALISASI PERUMAHAN DI INDONESIA STUDI KASUS KOTA PALEMBANG DAN KOTA PEKALONGAN Mahditia Paramita
Jurnal Kawistara Vol 4, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (239.445 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/kawistara.5228

Abstract

Housing decentralization not only positions housing sector as regional obligatory, but also triggerspublic expectations upon the improvement of housing conditions. Various weaknesses of centralizedsystem that full of generalization in housing policy makes decentralized system is interpreted as aninnovative renewal process. However, the central government still does a lot of intervention towardhousing program. Limitation happens to local government such as limitation in housing finance,weakness in coordination ability, and less established of local bureaucracy makes intervention fromcentral government in housing program financed by APBN always dominates. The least contributionfrom local government on public housing sector in decentralization era creates paradox. It is caused bythe Ministry of Public Housing (Kemenpera) that cannot perform fully as substitutional institution rolein managing housing in local area. Kemenpera position as ministerial cluster 3 makes them does nothave representative office in local area. Thus, there will be potential of a repeat experience in the past, inform of generalization in housing policy, that complicates the housing problems itself.
Community Satisfaction Analysis of the Implementation of Semen Gresik Rembang Factory’s CSR Mahditia Paramita; Hendra Hendra
Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (Indonesian Journal of Community Engagement) Vol 8, No 4 (2022)
Publisher : Direktorat Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jpkm.75679

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a form of corporate responsibility to the surrounding environment that the company must carry out to minimize environmental damage as a result of the establishment of the industry. This research wants to see the benefits of the program based on the results of community satisfaction assessment with quantitative and qualitative methods to determine the success of CSR program implementation. Public satisfaction with the implementation of the CSR program implemented by Semen Gresik Rembang Factory is directly proportional to the benefits obtained by the community. The success of the program is not only judged by the number of activities carried out, but also by the level of community satisfaction with the program and community participation in the program to support the improvement of the quality of human resources. Community capacity building is carried out through community empowerment programs to support sustainable development, which is an obligation in development in the world. The development and usefulness of activity programs need to be developed and expanded by beneficiaries to be able to solve problems that exist in the social, economic, and environmental spheres that are more effective and have a broader impact. The development and usefulness of activity programs need to be developed and expanded by beneficiaries to be able to solve problems that exist in the social, economic, and environmental spheres that are more effective and have a broader impact. The increase in community involvement also needs to be carried out not only in the process of identification, socialization, implementation, and monitoring of evaluation, but further participation until the community is able and participates in sharing more roles in the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility activities carried out by Semen Gresik Rembang Factory.
PARADOKS DESENTRALISASI PERUMAHAN DI INDONESIA STUDI KASUS KOTA PALEMBANG DAN KOTA PEKALONGAN Mahditia Paramita
Jurnal Kawistara Vol 4, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/kawistara.5228

Abstract

Housing decentralization not only positions housing sector as regional obligatory, but also triggerspublic expectations upon the improvement of housing conditions. Various weaknesses of centralizedsystem that full of generalization in housing policy makes decentralized system is interpreted as aninnovative renewal process. However, the central government still does a lot of intervention towardhousing program. Limitation happens to local government such as limitation in housing finance,weakness in coordination ability, and less established of local bureaucracy makes intervention fromcentral government in housing program financed by APBN always dominates. The least contributionfrom local government on public housing sector in decentralization era creates paradox. It is caused bythe Ministry of Public Housing (Kemenpera) that cannot perform fully as substitutional institution rolein managing housing in local area. Kemenpera position as ministerial cluster 3 makes them does nothave representative office in local area. Thus, there will be potential of a repeat experience in the past, inform of generalization in housing policy, that complicates the housing problems itself.