A.M Tri Anggraini
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KONSUMEN PENGGUNA PRODUK MASKER SHISEIDO YANG MENGGUNAKAN BAHASA ASING (STUDI TERHADAP KEMASAN SHISEIDO DALAM BAHASA JEPANG DI WILAYAH TANGERANG) Rini Yarti; A.M Tri Anggraini
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (397.185 KB) | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2930

Abstract

An imported product to be traded into the territory of Indonesia must include an Indonesian language label in accordance with established regulations, the regulation is regulated in Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Minister of Trade Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 73 / M-DAG / PER / 9/2015 concerning Label Inclusion In Indonesian in Goods. Every product introduced to consumers must be accompanied by correct information. This information is needed so that consumers do not have a wrong picture of the product. This information can be submitted in various ways, one of which is by including an Indonesian translation label on the foreign language label listed on the product packaging. Information on product packaging labels is very necessary for the community so that each individual can correctly determine the choice before buying and consuming the product. In fact there are still many producers who are not responsible for selling cosmetic products that do not meet the requirements. Cosmetic products that do not meet these requirements can be found easily in malls, in traditional markets, or through the internet. The role of the state in this case the government is needed to protect consumers from the circulation of products that do not meet the requirements. So legal protection for consumers is needed to increase awareness of the rights as consumers.
TANGGUNGJAWAB PELAKU USAHA ATAS INFORMASI YANG BENAR DAN JELAS ATAS PRODUK SUSU KENTAL MANIS MENURUT UU NO. 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Steven Salim; A.M Tri Anggraini
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i1.12031

Abstract

Some people are unable to fulfill their food needs to fulfill their children's nutrition completely. People generally choose to buy affordable food to buy. SKM products provided by business actors whose product content contains very high sugar with this content will cause obesity in the community. The purpose of this thesis is to find out the responsibility of the sweetened condensed milk business actors in the distribution of their products according to Law no. 8/1999 and what is the form of BPOM supervision of the circulation of sweetened condensed milk that provides protection to consumers according to the Consumer Protection Law. Therefore, responsibility and honesty become one of the main obligations for business actors in running their business. With the existence of this responsibility of Business Actors, it is expected to build public trust as consumers in consuming the products of Business Actors. In fact, not all SKM business actors carry out their responsibilities in trading their products in the community. Food content that is not good for consumption every day and lack of information on SKM is a form of neglect of consumer rights that often occurs in society. This action poses a security threat to consumer rights in terms of obtaining clear information regarding the content of food traded by business actors.
ANALISIS TANGGUNG JAWAB PELAKU USAHA PT. JASA MARGA TERHADAP PELANGGARAN HAK KESELAMATAN KONSUMEN PENGGUNA JALAN TOL DITINJAU DARI PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 15 TAHUN 2005 TENTANG JALAN TOL. Mayskhye Techtonia; A.M Tri Anggraini
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (444.259 KB) | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2910

Abstract

Roads are one of the most important transportation infrastructures in people's lives and have an important role in the efforts to develop the life of the nation and state, especially the construction of toll roads that are safe and comfortable for journeys. But along with the development of the era, resulting in many problems that occur related to toll road safety, so the question arises: How is legal protection for consumers of toll road users in the right to safety on the highway? And How the Responsibilities of Business Actors PT. Jasa Marga regarding violations of consumer safety of toll road users in terms of Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 concerning toll roads? As normative legal protection road users a toll had been arranged in several regulations which includes government regulation number 15 of 2005 and completed explicitly by law number 8 of 1999 on consumer protection. But what envisaged in the regulation in protecting and responsibility of have been given by PT. Jasa Marga not fully been implemented especially consumers road users toll in the soles safety on the highway
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KONSUMEN TERHADAP PEMBONGKARAN RUMAH DAN SERTIFIKAT YANG TIDAK SELESAI DALAM PEMBELIAN RUMAH SECARA KREDIT (Studi Kasus Jual Beli Rumah Di Cikarang) Tia Monica Ifana; A.M Tri Anggraini
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (470.642 KB) | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2142

Abstract

Legal protection for consumers means all government efforts to ensure legal certainty to provide protection to its citizens so that their rights as a citizen is not violated, and for those who violate will be subject to sanctions in accordance with applicable regulations. consumer protection at this time can not be separated from trading activities, in trade activities such as housing construction is expected to create a balance of rights and obligations between business actors and consumers. but the housing scheme often involves some problems that can hurt the consumer housing industry, because there are still many developers who only seek profits as big as possible without thinking about the needs of consumers, with the rights of consumers who violated the need for legal protection and responsibility of the perpetrator business based on Article 19 UUPK. The research method used by the writer is normative research method supported by interview with resource person. A brief analysis of this journal is titled by the author. Conclusions and suggestions about the issues studied by the author.
PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN ATAS INFORMASI YANG BENAR TERHADAP PROMOSI PRODUK DALAM TRANSAKSI PERDAGANGAN ELEKTRONIK MENURUT UNDANG–UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN evita lanosta; A.M Tri Anggraini
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i1.10996

Abstract

The intense competition among business actors makes business actors compete to create business strategies to attract consumers. One of the strategies taken by business actors is to hold offers or promotions in various forms, including in the electronic commerce transaction. However, these promotions sometimes lead to promises that are not in accordance with the contents of the agreement given by the business actor. One of the cases of product promotion that misleads consumers is the case of PT. Vega Data Indonesia which has reached the court with the decision of the District Court No. 524 / Pis.Sus / 2020 / PN Jkt.Utr. How should the form of consumer protection for correct information on product promotion in electronic commerce transactions according to Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and other related regulations? Researchers examined these problems using normative legal research methods. Research data shows that there is a legal violation of the obligation of business actors to provide correct information on product promotion by business actors which results in consumers experiencing losses. The existing form of consumer legal protection includes two things, namely protection in the sense of prevention (preventive) and repressive legal protection (action). The form of preventive protection (prevention) is the guidance and supervision of consumers, while the form of repressive protection includes efforts to resolve disputes through channels (court) litigation and non litigation (out of court). Legal protection for consumers using online loan services by PT. Vega Data Indonesia is a form of repressive legal protection.
ANALISIS PRAKTIK MONOPOLI DALAM PEMASARAN BAHAN BAKAR AVTUR DI INDONESIA DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA: Analysis Of Monopolistic Practices In Marketing Avtural Fuel In Indonesia From A Competition Law Perspective Razaan Nazhif Firmansyah; A.M Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i3.21128

Abstract

Competition in the aviation sector is crucial for improving quality of life and the economy. The formulation of the problem of this article is the form of government policy in the marketing of avtur fuel by PT Pertamina Patra Niaga which results in monopolistic practices and unfair business competition, and the potential exemption of PT Pertamina Patra Niaga from Articles 50(a) and 51 of Law No. 5 of 1999. Using a normative legal method with a legislative approach and descriptive nature, secondary data was obtained through literature studies and interviews with the Federation of United Pertamina Workers' Union (FSPBB). The research results and conclusions are  government policies in avtur marketing by PT Pertamina Patra Niaga have created a natural monopoly harming consumers and hindering healthy competition, and exemption from Article 50(a) of Law No. 5/1999 is justified, but PT Pertamina Patra Niaga does not meet Article 51 criteria as it is not a state-owned enterprise but a subsidiary of PT Pertamina Persero.