Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Leslie Kwek
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
POLEMIK KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI MENGUJI PERATURAN YANG MENGATUR EKSISTENSINYA Brandon David; Diva Anastasya Suharto; Leslie Kwek
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v3i2.10561

Abstract

Constitutional Court’s authority as a state institution that was created through the fourth amendment of the 1945 Constitution is mandated in paragraph 24C of  1945. Contitution essencially, Constutional Court’s has been given a role as a patron of constitution. Since Constitutional Court’s is the only one that has authority to review law to the state institution.Constituional Court’s has various functions, including performing constitutional review, where it ensures that legislation complies with the Constitution, including the human rights provisions, and can invalidate legislative provisions that it finds to be unconstitutional.Under this authority, everyone is allowed to bring unconstitutional statutes before the Constitutional Court’s. Accordingly the Controversy regarding the constitutional Court’s authority arises to do a review of Constution in Constitutional Court’s. The Controversy is based on contradiction between to formal legal principles, which the two are binding. This article then concludes with an analysis of the controversy on constitutional Court’s authority issues that remain.
Co-Authors Brandon David Diva Anastasya Suharto