Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Al-Hukkam : Journal of Islamic Family Law
Teti Hadiati
IAIN Pekalongan
Religion Humanities Astronomy Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan

 1 
THE LAW POLITICS IN THE REFORMULATION OF INTERFAITH MARRIAGE IN INDONESIA Teti Hadiati
JURNAL ILMIAH MIZANI: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi, dan Keagamaan Vol 7, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UINFAS Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v7i1.2775

Abstract

The problems examined in this study is wast are interfaith marriages in accordance with the philosophical values of Indonesian marriage law? and why is the validity of interfaith marriages still being disputed in Indonesian marriage law? Related to the principle of continuing legal conditions and public order, the implementation of registration marriage by registration is a form of acceptance of interfaith marriages and the community has accepted the phenomenon of interfaith marriages as a natural reality and is considered to be true. This research is normative legal research and quantitative sociological legal research. The study methodology is analyzed based on the principle of public order, law smuggling, and continuation of the legal situation or rights that have been obtained. From this research, it was concluded that interfaith marriages were considered incompatible with the philosophical values of Indonesian Marriage law which were based on religious law, and could injure the long struggle history of Indonesian marriage law legislation under the principle of public order. Therefore, the registrations carried out by the civil registry office are not authoritative, but merely administrative.
Co-Authors Makrum Kholil R Arrazy Rachmat Lukman Hakim