Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
I Made sepud
Univesitas Warmadewa
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Anak I Ketut Eka Yoga Juliantika; I Made sepud; I Ketut Sukadana
Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (179.523 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/jkh.2.1.2546.374-378

Abstract

Children are often victims of child trafficking crime. There are a lot of factors that support the crime of child trafficking, one of which is the lack of regulation on child trafficking. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the regulation of child trafficking and how the criminal law policy against child trafficking. This research was designed using a normative legal research method. The results of this study indicated that the regulation of child trafficking is regulated in Law No. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, the Criminal Code (KUHP), namely Article 297, Article 301, Article 324, Article 328, and Article 330, RI Law No. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, Law No. 35 of 2014 on Amendments to Law no. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, and Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Furthermore, the criminal law policy against child trafficking is regulated in the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Law no. 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, Law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System, and Law no. 35 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law no. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.
Upaya Hukum Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia I Made Wisnu Wijaya Kusuma; I Made sepud; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (553.887 KB) | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.1.2.2438.73-77

Abstract

Criminal justice system and Indonesian criminal procedural law adhere to presumption of innocence.So, a person must protect his human rights. KUHAP formed a new institution, namely pretrial. Based on this research authors raise formulation problems: 1. How pretrial regulation criminal justice system Indonesia, 2. How validity pretrial that has not been decided if the subject matter case has been tried. Type research used normative. approach method used statutory approach, shortening analysis legal concepts. pre-trial authority according to Article 77 Criminal Procedure Code examines whether or not coercive measures are arrest and detention well examine whether or not termination investigation or prosecution, compensation and rehabilitation legal or not. Judge Sarpin stated that Sprindik, which became the basis for Budi Gunawan's investigation, was invalid. pretrial regulations are regulated Law No. 8 of 1981 on Criminal Procedure Law in article 77 Criminal Procedure Code, namely pretrial, which authority district court examine and decide, Constitutional Court Number 21/PUU -XII/2014, authority pre-trial institution also includes whether or not determination suspects valid, searches and confiscation. Validity investigations carried out by KPK regarding determination suspect Budi Gunawan was invalid therefore determination had no binding legal force. The Subject matter pretrial case being tried declared null and void.
Co-Authors I Ketut Eka Yoga Juliantika I Ketut Sukadana I Made Wisnu Wijaya Kusuma Karma, Ni Made Sukaryati