This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Anju Syafana Ananda
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

TINJAUAN TERHADAP PENJUALAN KOSMETIK ILEGAL/TANPA IZIN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN NOMOR 186/PID.SUS /2018/PN PTI) Anju Syafana Ananda; Mariske Myeke Tampi
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.13650

Abstract

Thoughts of the Panel of Judges in viewing and selecting cases in the crime of illegal/unlicensed demonstration of selling makeup in Choice Number 186/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Pti, especially from a juridical and non-juridical perspective. The juridical perspective is the thought of the Panel of Judges, which considers the position, indictment and request of the examiner, witnesses, evidence and facts in the preliminary interaction. Meanwhile, the non-juridical reflection by the Panel of Judges included the basis of the plaintiff's activities, the results of the respondent's activities, the social and monetary conditions of the plaintiff and the strict components of the plaintiff. It was these two reflections that decided the Panel of Judges to select/enchant the plaintiffs. Thoughts of the Panel of Judges in viewing and selecting cases in the crime of selling makeup illegally/without permission in Choice Number 186/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Pti, especially from a juridical and non-juridical perspective. The juridical perspective is the thought of the Panel of Judges, which considers the position, indictment and request of the examiner, witnesses, evidence and facts in the preliminary interaction. Meanwhile, the non-juridical reflection by the Panel of Judges included the basis of the plaintiff's activities, the results of the respondent's activities, the social and monetary conditions of the plaintiff and the strict components of the plaintiff. It was these two reflections that decided the Panel of Judges to choose/enchant the plaintiffs.