Emanuel Prasetyono
Widya Mandala Catholic University Of Surabaya

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

Manusia, Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Kesadaran Diri Prasetyono, Emanuel
Jurnal Orientasi Baru VOLUME 22, NOMOR 02, OKTOBER 2013
Publisher : Jurnal Orientasi Baru

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (184.721 KB)

Abstract

Human consciousness has brought about change and human development. The Enlightenment gave birth to a new generation of men and women who are aware of their human potentials to grow. Human mind is its centre. Yet, later science and technology have been its predominant influence. Modern culture has not been spared from this hegemony. The Enlightenment’s project therefore could be considered a failure particularly for conditioning as well as subjecting human understanding into what it merely empirical. The empirical is viewed as the only measure that counts. Does human being not deserve a more integral and holistic approach and understanding in every stage of its development? Human beings are personal, rational as well as relational. These are constitutive in their nature as they live in a community, in their dignity as a person and in the formation of human culture and civilization.
Bertemu Dengan Realitas: Belajar Dari Fenomenologi Husserl Emanuel Prasetyono
Arete Vol 1, No 1 (2012)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (481.86 KB)

Abstract

Phenomenology would like to restore man’s process of gaining knowledge in the relationship between the ideal transcendental subject which tends to the object, and the appearing object to man’s consciousness, precisely after the long history of tumult and tension between rationalism and empiricism on the valid ground of knowledge. In phenomenology, human consciousness brings man about being capable of transcending himself, his livelihood, the world, and others. In phenomenology, human reason now is as being-in the world, in its relationship with consciousness itself, the world, and others. That human life, the world, and nature live in peace and truth is phenomenology’s contribution to life that we hope it be so.
Menggali Cikal-Bakal Martabat Hidup Publik Dalam Terang Filsafat Politik Aristoteles Emanuel Prasetyono
Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial Vol 17 No 01 (2012): Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial
Publisher : Center for Philosophy and Ethics

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/respons.v17i01.739

Abstract

Pemikiran politik Niccollo Machiavelli didasarkan pada konsep mengenai kekuasaan seorang penguasa sebagai kenyataan yang sejati dan rasionalitas universal. Rakyat adalah massa yang menyatakan kepentingan kelompok dan rasionalitas partikular dan karena itu bisa dikuasai dan diatur demi kepentingan kekuasaan. Para moralis tidak menyukai pemikiran Machiavelli kendati banyak penguasa di banyak negara dan menghayati dan mempraktikkan pemikiran Machiavelli. Apabila Negara dikelola menurut pemikiran Machiavelli maka rakyat tidak lebih dari massa tanpa nilai pribadi dan dianggap irasional. Dalam kenyataannya, massa adalah rakyat adalah orang-orang biasa yang sejak dari awal miskin atau dibuat miskin oleh kondisi sosial yang carut-marut dan tidak adil. Artikel ini mau mengangkat sebuah alternative pemecahan terhadap masalah kekacauan akibat penyalahgunaan kekuasaan dalam masyarakat dengan menawarkan kekuatan komunikasi yang merumuskan rasionalitas universal melalui wacana ruang publik.
Manusia, Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Kesadaran Diri Emanuel Prasetyono
Jurnal Orientasi Baru VOLUME 22, NOMOR 02, OKTOBER 2013
Publisher : Jurnal Orientasi Baru

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Human consciousness has brought about change and human development. The Enlightenment gave birth to a new generation of men and women who are aware of their human potentials to grow. Human mind is its centre. Yet, later science and technology have been its predominant influence. Modern culture has not been spared from this hegemony. The Enlightenments project therefore could be considered a failure particularly for conditioning as well as subjecting human understanding into what it merely empirical. The empirical is viewed as the only measure that counts. Does human being not deserve a more integral and holistic approach and understanding in every stage of its development? Human beings are personal, rational as well as relational. These are constitutive in their nature as they live in a community, in their dignity as a person and in the formation of human culture and civilization.
Menggagas Fusi Horison Dalam Hermeneutika Hans Georg Gadamer Sebagai Model Saling Memahami Bagi Dialog Antarbudaya Dengan Relevansi Pada Pancasila Sebagai Landasan Dialogis Filosofis Emanuel Prasetyono
Studia Philosophica et Theologica Vol 22 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Litbang STFT Widya Sasana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35312/spet.v22i1.431

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fusion of horizons is the encounter between horizon of the past and of the present in the projection to the future. It takes place in all kind of understanding which is influenced by historically effected consciousness. In the realm of individual activity, fusion of horizons is characterized by formative and existential aspect as continual learning on how to be rooted in one’s own history and culture. Formatively, fusion of horizons leads to build one’s own character to be man of dialogue which is capable of adapting himself with his cultural environment. In the realm of social life, fusion of horizons deals with dialogue in the atmosphere of each other understanding culturally. Practically, dialogue is the formative praxis which enables those who involve in it to understand each other the relationship among themselves and their culture. The concept of the fusion of horizons has the role of bridging different views through hermeneutical and dialogical approach which is based on the process of pursuing meaning and the transformation of prejudices. As the result, the horizons of those who involve in a dialogue will be transformed richly and largely. ABSTRAK Fusi horison adalah perjumpaan antara horison masa lampau dan horison masa kini yang terjadi dalam seluruh aktivitas memahami yang dipengaruhi oleh sejarah pengaruh atas dasar dampak-dampak historis dari masa lalu dan proyeksi ke arah masa depan. Dalam ranah individual, fusi horison bersifat formatif dan eksistensial sebagai sarana pembelajaran secara terus-menerus untuk berakar pada sejarah dan jati diri budaya sendiri. Proyeksinya terarah kepada pembentukan karakter diri sebagai sosok manusia yang berdialog dan mampu beradaptasi dengan lingkungan di sekitarnya. Dalam ranah sosial, fusi horison mewujud dalam aktivitas saling memahami dalam dialog. Praksis berdialog adalah bagian dari formasi manusia untuk mengenal dengan baik hubungan-hubungan antara dirinya, sesamanya, dan kebudayaannya. Konsep fusi horison menjembatani horison-horison yang berbeda melalui pendekatan dialogis-hermeneutik atas dasar proses pencarian makna-makna dan transformasi prasangka-prasangka. Hasil dari proses fusi horison adalah transformasi horison ke dalam jangkauan pandangan yang lebih luas. Kata Kunci: Budaya, Dampak Historis, Dialog, Fusi Horison, Prasangka, Saling Memahami.
Manusia, Pengetahuan, Filsafat, dan Teknologi: Sebuah Kajian, Manfaat, dan Sumbangan Bagi Hidup Manusia Cicilia Damayanti; Emanuel Prasetyono
Studia Philosophica et Theologica Vol 22 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Litbang STFT Widya Sasana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35312/spet.v22i2.440

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi menyebabkan terjadinya evolusi dalam hidup manusia. Revolusi industri 4.0 telah mengubah tatanan hidup, terutama dalam kaitannya dengan interaksi antar manusia. Artikel ini akan membahas tentang peran filsafat informasi melalui sudut pandang pemikiran Luciano Floridi. Metode yang dipakai adalah analisis buku karangan Floridi dan juga beberapa pengarang yang lain. Manusia semakin tergantung pada teknologi. Bahkan, komunikasi yang terjalin saat ini mulai mengaburkan peran tubuh manusia. Manusia mengalami dualisme tentang peran tubuh dan pikiran dalam era teknologi saat ini. Apakah filsafat masih memiliki peran dalam era teknologi ini? Menurut Floridi masih tetap berperan. Menurutnya saat ini informasi dibutuhkan dalam filsafat, untuk itu dia mengajukan filsafat informasi. Filsafat informasi menjadi sarana untuk filsafat tetap menjadi ilmu pengetahuan yang kritis dan lebih faktual dalam menyentuh masalah sosial yang dihadapi manusia saat ini. Filsafat informasi membantu manusia untuk semakin bijak dalam menggunakan teknologi. Filsafat dan ilmu pengetahun berperan penting untuk membantu manusia tetap kritis sehingga dapat menggunakan teknologi dan menyaring informasi yang dibutuhkan dalam hidupnya
Manusia Dalam Logika Politik di Era Media Digital Prasetyono, Emanuel; Pandor, Pius
Studia Philosophica et Theologica Vol 24 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Litbang STFT Widya Sasana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35312/spet.v24i2.598

Abstract

Political praxis in the digital media era often contains biases in understanding human dignity. This article wants to investigate whether the political logic in such an era contains certain concepts about humans that are implicit, hidden, or intentionally hidden. The theoretical framework of Shoshana Zuboff and Agus Sudibyo's thoughts on "Capital Surveillance" and "Digital Universe" is the reference used by the author to see to what extent the role of the use of digital technology and virtual spaces in political propaganda contains humanitarian biases and does not direct political goals on human dignity. The results of the author's observations and research show that political praxis in the digital media era has utilized humanitarian issues only for the sake of pragmatic and transactional electoral political interests. The author finds that human dignity in political practice in the digital media era is only an instrument, not a goal.