Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Dilematika Antara Hak Pendidikan dan Hak Kesehatan Dalam Proses Pembelajaran di Masa Pandemi Athari Farhani; Faiqah Nur Azizah
Jurist-Diction Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Volume 5 No. 2, Maret 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v5i2.34875

Abstract

AbstractThe Indonesian constitution guarantees the fulfillment of the right to education as stated in Article 28C paragraph (1) and Article 31 paragraph (1) as well as regulates the right to health insurance as stated in Article 28H paragraph (1). Both are fundamental rights that must be fulfilled by the state as mandated by the constitution. However, this becomes a dilemma when the two rights must be clashed when Covid-19 is hitting Indonesia. On the one hand, the implementation of online distance learning (PJJ) raises new social problems regarding the right to education, but on the other hand, if face-to-face learning is carried out, the right to health must still be prioritized. It has been more than a year since a pandemic has hit the world, many changes that ultimately require reforms in learning methods, but the complexity of implementing policies that adapt to pandemic conditions must be enforced without compromising the fulfillment of the right to education and the right to health. Both are important rights for the community for survival through health and to improve self-quality through education. This is what makes the author want to do further research to answer the questions above. To answer this, the author uses a normative research method, namely by examining library materials or secondary data as the basic material for research. The approach used is a conceptual and statutory approach. The data in this study were obtained through secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The collected data was then analyzed using descriptive-analytical techniques to draw conclusions.Keywords: Right to Education; Right to Health; Distance Learning; Covid-19. AbstrakKonstitusi Indonesia menjamin pemenuhan hak atas pendidikan yang tertuang dalam Pasal 28C ayat (1) dan Pasal 31 ayat (1) sekaligus mengatur hak atas jaminan kesehatan yang tertuang dalam pasal 28H ayat (1). Keduanya merupakan hak fundamental yang harus dipenuhi oleh negara sebagaimana amanat konstitusi. Namun hal tersebut menjadi dilematis tatakala kedua hak tersebut harus dibenturkan disaat covid-19 tengah melanda Indonesia. Disatu sisi Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh (PJJ) secara daring menimbulkan persoalan sosial baru atas hak pendidikan namun disisi lain jika pembelajaran tatap muka dilaksanakan hak atas kesehatan tetap harus diprioritaskan. Sudah satu tahun lebih pandemi melanda dunia, banyak perubahan yang pada akhirnya mensyaratkan adanya pembaharuan dalam metode pembelajaran, namun kompleksitas atas penerapan kebijakan yang menyesuaikan kondisi pandemi harus diberlakukan tanpa mengesampingkan pemenuhan hak atas pendidikan dan hak atas kesehatan. Keduanya merupakan hak penting bagi masyarakat untuk keberlangsungan hidup melalui kesehatan dan untuk meningkatkan kualitas diri melalui pendidikan. Hal inilah yang membuat penulis ingin melakukan penelitian lebih lanjut untuk menjawab persoalan di atas. Untuk menjawab hal tersebut penulis menggunakan metode penelitian normatif yaitu dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder sebagai bahan dasar untuk diteliti. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan (conceptual and statute approach). Data dalam penelitian ini diperoleh melalui data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tertier. Data yang terkumpul kemudian dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik deskriptif-analitis untuk selanjutnya ditarik kesimpulan. Kata Kunci: Hak Pendidikan; Hak Kesehatan; Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh; Covid-19.
URGENSITAS PENGUATAN ETIKA PROFESI HAKIM Athari Farhani; Faiqah Nur Azizah; Nur Kholifah
Judex Laguens Vol 2 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Ikatan Hakim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/ikahi.2.1.4.2024.55-74

Abstract

The judge as the main element in the court places his profession as a representative of God, because the judge's job is to determine law and justice in society, so the responsibility he bears is very heavy but noble. Therefore, the profession of judges has such great power, that judges are required to balance an attitude that is full of responsibility to conscience and ethical values ​​towards their profession. However, if you look at the current reality, there has been a decline in the quality of judges not only in their decisions but also in regards to a decrease in the moral aspect. Strengthening ethics in the profession of judges is a necessity and obligation for state administrators because ethics is the main corridor for judges in carrying out their duties so that they continue to carry out their profession in a professional manner without putting aside the values ​​of honesty and morality. This is an effort to realize fair law enforcement. The research method used in this study is a normative method with a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. The results of this study are that judges must be able to embody ethical and moral values ​​as formulated in the code of ethics for the profession of judges, namely by exploring the sense of justice held by society. With an ethical and moral foundation through the professional code of ethics of judges, judges will realize fair law enforcement.