Eric Stenly Holle
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Pembentukan Peraturan Negeri yang Partisipatif Dalam Pelaksanaan Pemerintah Negeri Hutumuri Kecamatan Leitimur Selatan Kota Ambon Eric Stenly Holle; Reny Heronia Nendissa; Junior A N Lumintang
AIWADTHU: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2021): Volume 1 Nomor 2, September 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (590.117 KB) | DOI: 10.47268/aiwadthu.v1i2.672

Abstract

Introduction: Community involvement in the formation of Negeri Regulations from the beginning of the process to evaluation is a condition that must even exist in a country that adheres to the understanding of people's sovereignty.Purposes of Devotion: Providing education and legal knowledge to the Negeri Government and Public Affairs Hutumuri District of Leitimur South Ambon City so as to engage and be involved in every process of establishing the Regulation of Foreign. Method of Devotion: Sources describe materials related to the establishment of rules of domestic participatory followed by a discussion and question and answer between the presenters and participants in the activity.Results of the Devotion: The Negeri Government and the community are able to understand matters related to the formation of Negeri Regulations and are able to resolve problems related to community involvement in the process of forming Negeri Regulations as regulated in various laws and regulations so that it is hoped that the draft of a legal product in the form of a Negeri Regulation can actively involve the community in contributing thoughts, ideas, ideas, and suggestions that affect the substance of the Negeri Regulation
Wewenang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Dalam Pemeriksaan Maladministrasi Tes Wawasan Kebangsaan Pegawai Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dedi Rusman Tuarita; Victor Juzuf Sedubun; Eric Stenly Holle
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1, No 12 (2022): Volume 1 Nomor 12, Februari 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Introduction: Law Number 37 of 2008 concerning the Ombudsman gives authority to the Ombudsman to supervise and examine the implementation of public services for maladministration by state officials. However, in carrying out its authority, the ombudsman is faced with the problem of the KPK TWK and receives a report on the maladministration of the KPK employee TWK, so this raises the issue of whether the KPK employee TWK is part of maladministration and part of the administration of public services.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to find out the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia has the authority to examine maladministration of the national insight test of employees of the corruption eradication commission. Methods of the Research: Type of research used is normative, namely research that is based on the rule of law that can provide an explanation of the problems being studied. The problem approach is the legal approach (statute approach) and the conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The collection of legal materials through primary legal materials is then linked to secondary legal materials.Results of the Research: Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia has the authority to examine maladministration of the national insight test of corruption eradication commission employees, as that the TWK of KPK employees is part of the object of maladministration examination which is a term related to the duties of the ombudsman according to the form and concept of maladministration and based on article 1 number 3 Law No. 37 of 2008. and TWK of KPK employees are part of public services within the scope of administrative services as referred to in Article 5 paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 46 paragraph (1) of Law Number 25 of 2009 and as well as maladministration in the implementation TWK which resulted in 51 KPK employees being dismissed, so that KPK employees reported TWK maladministration to the ombudsman. Thus the ombudsman carries out his duties and functions in examining the TWK of KPK employees according to the provisions of Article 6 and Article 7 of Law No. 37 of 2008 which gives the ombudsman the authority to receive maladministration reports.
Kewenangan Pemerintah Dalam Melakukan Pengawasan Terhadap Lingkungan Hidup Modesta Nusalawo; Victor Juzuf Sedubun; Eric Stenly Holle
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2, No 7 (2022): Volume 2 Nomor 7, September 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v2i7.1135

Abstract

Introduction: provides This study discusses the issue of government authority in supervising the environment.This study discusses the issue of government authority in supervising the environmentPurposes of the Research:  The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the government's authority in the environmental sector and to determine the implementation of the local government's supervisory authority on the environment based on Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation.Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative legal research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach.Results of the Research: The results and discussion show that the Government based on Article 1 Paragraph (3), Article 71 paragraph (3) and Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management and Article 72 of Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation, has the authority to carry out supervision of the environment which is the problem used by the author, namely the authority to supervise. The authority for environmental supervision according to Law No. 32 of 2009 includes supervision and the imposition of sanctions. However, the Job Creation Law Number 11 of 2020 specifically regulates, supervises and applies sanctions. The job creation law provides environmental approval, supervision and application of sanctions in the form of direct and indirect warnings, government coercion and does not give authority to local governments in supervising and implementing sanctions.