Deni Purba
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

SENGKETA PULAU DOKDO ANTARA JEPANG DAN KOREA SELATAN Utami Gita Syafitri; Arif Arif; Deni Purba
Journal of USU International Law Vol 1, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Journal of USU International Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (100.399 KB)

Abstract

Abstract Dokdo Island’s dispute is a territorial dispute involving Japan and South Korea in the fight over an island located in the Sea of ​​Japan. Government of Japan and South Korea based their claim over Dokdo Island ownership on historical evidence and geographical connectivity. Dokdo Island’s dispute impede the process of negotiating maritime delimitation zone in the Sea of ​​Japan. It is necessary to immediately resolve the Dokdo Island dispute by setting limits of maritime zones Japan and South Korea, as well as provide legal certainty on the status of ownership of Dokdo Island. Claims to sovereignty over Dokdo Island is a core issue that must be resolved first. In an attempt to resolve the dispute Dokdo Island, the Government of Japan and South Korea have done several rounds of negotiations and did not find any way of settlement. Dokdo Island’s dispute resolution solutions can be made through the Joint Development Agreement, the settlement through diplomatic channels and settlement through legal channels. In order to avoid the dispute dragged on, the Government of Japan and South Korea should immediately take back the diplomatic negotiations in order to resolve Dokdo Island’s dispute. Keywords : Territorial Dispute, Dokdo Island 
SUATU TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERJANJIAN EKSTRADISI INDONESIA DAN REPUBLIK KOREA SELATAN Alma Panjaitan; Jelly Leviza; Deni Purba
Journal of USU International Law Vol 1, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Journal of USU International Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (68.246 KB)

Abstract

Abstraksi Extradition treaty between Republic of Indonesia and Republic of Korea was signed on the 28th November 2000 in Jakarta and ratified through Act Number 42 of 2007. With the ratification of Act Number 42 of 2007 the relationship and cooperation between the two countries for law enforcement and eradication of crimes are mutually beneficial. This study focuses on the history and development of the extradition treaty, procedures to implement the extradition and legal analysis of the extradition treaties of the Republic of Indonesia and the Republic of Korea.Keywords : Extradition, Indonesia, South Korea
PERAN UNI EROPA DALAM PROSES PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BAGI NEGARA ANGGOTA DAN NEGARA NON ANGGOTA Carina Etta Siahaan; Arif Arif; Deni Purba
Journal of USU International Law Vol 1, No 3 (2013)
Publisher : Journal of USU International Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (93.696 KB)

Abstract

Abstract The main reason for the establishment of the first European Union once was because of the desire to provide protection to the European countries that are victims of cruel regimes of Germany during World War II. After the signing of the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, the European Union is increasingly proving its progress to the international community as one of the largest regional organizations. Expand the authority of the European Union in the field of law to be the same as the state. The European Union has a great sovereignty of the member states. Help resolve internal disputes in the European Union has two methods to resolve the internal disputes through alternative and legal means. The purpose of this paper is to look at the mechanism by the European Union as an international organization in its role to resolve disputes in the European Union. As an International Organisation which aims at maintaining world peace and security, the European Union also play the role to help resolve disputes outside the European Union. With the development of increasingly advanced, the European Union as an international organization has the effect of maintaining security and peace in the world, because it is also the European Union, have the opportunity to be able to play non-member countries to resolve disputes, without passing the limits of the sovereignty of a non-member country. Keyword: European Union, Dispute Resolution, Member States and non-State Member.
PEMBAJAKAN KAPAL DI LAUT LEPAS DITINJAU DARI HUKUM INTERNASIONAL (STUDI KASUS KAPAL MV JAHAN MONI) Yudi Tri Anantha; Arif Arif; Deni Purba
Journal of USU International Law Vol 1, No 3 (2013)
Publisher : Journal of USU International Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (151.853 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Piracy on the high seas either conducted by foreign vessels, as well as by domestic vessels in international waters lately been causing anxiety for international shipping. Repression high seas piracy is a crime, based on the force of international law relating to the high seas piracy. A ship M.V. Jahan Moni Bangladesh flagged off the Indian coast in the Arabian Sea was hijacked by the Somali people. The Somali piracy began to board the ship after chasing MV Jahan Moni in the Arabian Sea. Problems posed in this study is how the arrangement piracy on the high seas under international law, how the hijacking of the MV Jahan Moni and how efforts in addressing the problem of piracy on the high seas in cases of MV Jahan Moni? The method of research conducted with normative legal research or legal research library is done by researching the literature, and empirical legal research. Research the applicable law is normative or legal research is also called study of literature (library research) with the acquisition of secondary data sourced cider magazines, books, journals, newspapers, online websites, and other library documents. Based on the explanations that have been described in previous chapters, it can be concluded following a piracy action on the high seas and in general initially were motivated by economic factors. But in its development and in the present situation, the phenomenon of piracy in the context of acts of violence on the high seas wider. This is considering the possibility of the threat of terrorism in the background of both the Strait of non-economic issues (ideological), where it is possible that these actions are also carried out on the high seas, as well as ships at sea. Setting piracy on the high seas under international law that is based on the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Geneva Convention is also in line with Article 105 of UNCLOS which states in the high seas, or in every other place outside the jurisdiction of any State every State may seize a ship or aircraft piracy or a ship or aircraft taken by piracy and under the control of piracy and arrest the people who seized the goods on board. Changes or reconsideration (revision) can be done by expanding international jurisdictions with additional protocol, adding protocol in the United Nations Convention On The Law of the Sea (UNCLOS 1982) regarding the mechanisms to prosecute pirates, UNCLOS in 1982 through amendments to the provisions of article 311 adds piracy in Sea as one of the offenses that can be prosecuted in the International Criminal Court or the International Criminal Court (ICC) and establish special courts that deal with piracy at sea.   Keywords: Ship Piracy on the high seas