Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Judicial Review Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Ahmad Heru Romadhon
Universitas Maarif Hasyim Latif Sidoarjo
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Contempt of Court dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan PTUN: Suatu Perbandingan Indonesia dan Prancis Fajar Rachmad Dwi Miarsa; M Zamroni; Ahmad Heru Romadhon; Cholilla Hazir Adhaningrum
Journal of Judicial Review Vol 23 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v23i1.4351

Abstract

The aim of comparing the TUN judicial system in France with the Indonesian state is to provide an analysis of the competence of state administration justice in France (its administrative court), particularly regarding the administrative or technical implementation of the judiciary. This can provide direction for the ius constituendum in the competence of the Indonesian State Administrative Court, as well as explain contempt of court actions in the implementation of TUN Judicial decisions between Indonesia and France. The research was conducted using a normative juridical approach and has a literary nature. The Indonesian state administration court system still expects an ius constituendum regarding contempt of court regulation. The French state is known as a country that has judicial authority in the world so that the French state does not recognize contempt of court in the application of the TUN court decision.
Upaya Hukum untuk Mencegah Sengketa terhadap Debitur yang Mengalihkan Kredit Pemilikan Rumah Melalui Cessie Nur`ainy Agmilya Sasmitha; Ahmad Heru Romadhon
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 3 (2026): March: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/nke57p60

Abstract

The transfer of Home Ownership Credit (Kredit Pemilikan Rumah) through cessie constitutes a legally recognized mechanism for the assignment of receivables, yet it frequently generates legal disputes when debtor protection is inadequately ensured. This study examines legal efforts aimed at preventing disputes arising from the transfer of mortgage credit through cessie, with a particular focus on the position of debtors. Using a normative juridical approach, the research analyzes statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and relevant court decisions related to receivables transfer and security rights. The findings reveal that disputes commonly emerge due to insufficient notification to debtors, procedural deficiencies in the execution of cessie, and ambiguities concerning the continuity of mortgage guarantees. Preventive legal measures, including contractual clarity, compliance with statutory requirements, and strengthened institutional oversight, play a crucial role in reducing dispute potential. When preventive mechanisms fail, repressive legal remedies through litigation and alternative dispute resolution function as corrective instruments to restore legal balance. The study concludes that an integrated legal framework combining preventive and repressive measures is essential to ensure legal certainty and effective debtor protection in cessie-based mortgage transfers.
Co-Authors Cholilla Hazir Adhaningrum Fajar Rachmad Dwi Miarsa M Zamroni Nur`ainy Agmilya Sasmitha