This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ulumuna
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Al-Qur’an dan Pluralisme Agama: Perspektif Mahmoud Musthafa Ayoub Adi Fadli
Ulumuna Vol 9 No 1 (2005): Juni
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v9i1.448

Abstract

Islam is revealed by God in order to put human life in the right order in which they can reach and make justice, peace, welfare, and salvation of life. To make all those ideal objectives come true Muslims need some method of interpretation to the Qur’an, as ultimate Islamic normative base, to have it be in mutual accord with its real social-cultural context. It must be done in respective to its current epistemological development so that every methods developed in this subject is scientifically and methodologically acceptable. One of modern Muslim thinkers in this area is Mahmoud Musthafa Ayoub who tries to find out new interpretation method to the sacred texts of Qur’an in relation to religious pluralism. His way of interpretation asserted the Islamic tendency toward dialogue efforts in solving any problems related to religious pluralism. His way differs from most Muslims’ way that tends to make the ideal massage of Islam untouchable. He concludes that Islam wants Muslims to continuously make interreligious dialogue, especially with its two older brothers in Abrahamic religions—Jews and Christian.
Ahmadiyah: Sebuah Titik Yang Diabaikan Adi Fadli
Ulumuna Vol 11 No 2 (2007): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v11i2.409

Abstract

Abdul Mukti Ali mengatakan bahwa Ahmadiyah sebagai salah satu gerakan keagamaan belum memberikan sumbangan yang berarti terhadap pemikiran Islam modern di Indonesia. Deliar Noer, pakar sejarah Islam modern Indonesia, menyatakan bahwa Ahmadiyah merupakan kelompok kecil yang tidak berarti bagi pemikiran modern di Indonesia. Pernyataan kedua tokoh besar tersebut memberi kesan bahwa Ahmadiyah bukan merupakan titik yang memberi arti menjadi garis sehingga dapat bermakna bagi semesta. Ia seakan ditiadakan, bahkan dengan sengaja dinafikan setelah pada periode awal di Indonesia dengan tokoh-tokoh intelektualnya yang militan telah dapat memberikan pengaruh terhadap intelektual muda Islam.Jika sedemikian tidak pentingnya eksistensi Ahmadiyah, maka ada apa dengannya sehingga belakangan ini kelompok keagamaan itu mendapat sorotan banyak pihak?