This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ulumuna
Ahmad Choirul Rofiq
STAIN Ponorogo, Jawa Timur Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Fenomena Kelompok Sempalan Islam di Indonesia Ahmad Choirul Rofiq
Ulumuna Vol 11 No 2 (2007): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v11i2.400

Abstract

Understanding about religious splinter groups in Indonesian context is mainly identified through their theological difference from that of muslims majority. Their theological beliefs and practices are considered deviant from the majority’s “true” theology and practices. It at least can be concluded from the fatwa of MUI which then become formal reference to most muslims people in Indonesia. Though the fatwa face many critiques from some muslims groups, especially liberal muslims activists, but it remain assumed as truth by the majority of Indonesian muslims. There are many factors supporting the emergence of splinter groups in Indonesia. Beside the existence of some “advocates” such as liberal muslims activists and mass media, lack of law enforcement and the failure of religious leaders to educate their people to be more anticipative to the emergence of splinter groups. It is necessary to initiate open dialogues with followers of splinter groups, especially their leaders.
Menilai Kompetensi Al-Mâturîdî Di Bidang Tafsir Al-Qur’an Ahmad Choirul Rofiq
Ulumuna Vol 12 No 1 (2008): Juni
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v12i1.396

Abstract

Al-Mâturîdî has expertise in various Islamic sciences. In the Qur’anic exegesis, he has Ta’wîlât Ahl al-Sunnah or Ta’wîlât al-Qur’ân. This paper is going to explain the methodology of al-Mâturîdî’s exegesis. He clearly favors to combine the naqlî and ‘aqlî sources. Therefore, it can be identified as tafsîr bi al-izdiwâj (the exegesis which amalgamates tafsîr bi al-ma’tsûr with tafsîr bi al-ra’y). He is not an excessive commentator in using grammatical analysis to interpret the Qur’anic verses. He sometimes presents many styles of qirâ’ah (recitation of the Qur’an) without thorough elucidation. He almost never takes Isrâ’îliyyât (the Judeo-Christian traditions and tales) to interpret the Qur’anic verses. He prefers tawassuth (nonaligned and independent standpoint) when dealing with many different viewpoints among the theologians. He tends to follow the Hanafite school of thought in discussing the jurisprudential Qur’anic verses. He usually uses asbâb al-nuzûl (the causes of revelation) slackly.