Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Pandemi Corona Sebagai Dalil Force Majeure Dalam Pembatalan Suatu Kontrak Viderina Khotaro; Vania Zelin Lawrence Simanjorang; Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), November
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (715.916 KB) | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v4i2.807

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the corona pandemic categorized in Force Majeure in a contract. This problem is focused on the existence of the Corona pandemic, which can make debtors delay in fulfilling achievements or canceling contracts. How to claim Force Majeuree in a business contract. In order to approach this problem, a normative juridical legal research type is used with a descriptive-analytic nature of research aimed at describing it systematically, factually. Data - data collected through secondary data and analyzed qualitatively. Covid-19 can be categorized as force majeure, used as an excuse for the debtor not to fulfill the contract. Force majeure conditions cannot be used as a reason for canceling a contract, but renegotiation can be carried out to cancel or change the contents of a previously agreed contract. With Covid-19 being able to make debtors delay in fulfilling their achievements or canceling contracts, Covid-19 is considered to be a force majeure depending on the meaning of force majeure if it is included in the contract. As long as the affected party is able to prove that the force majeure conditions have been met. How to claim force majeure in a business contract in the Covid-19 era, claim force majeure based on appropriate legal references. The claiming parties must analyze whether a pandemic, disaster or government action applies certain provisions including the scope of force majeure accommodated in the contract.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP HUTANG YANG JATUH TEMPO DAN DAPAT DITAGIH DALAM PERMOHONAN PKPU DAN PAILIT YANG DIAJUKAN OLEH DEBITUR Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi; Tengku Putra Muhammad Iqbal; Zeandrico Immanuel Ferdolin Hutabarat
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 2 (2021): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v10i2.1805

Abstract

Tujuan Penelitian ini merupakan untuk menjelaskan hubungan preindustrial antara perusahaan dan pekerja mengenai hutang menurut putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN Niaga Mdn dan putusan Nomor 8/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019/PN Niaga Mdn. Kepailitan suatu perusahaan dapat menyebabkan para pekerja di PHK dan secara tidak langsung perusahaan memiliki kewajiban membayarkan sejumlah uang kepada pekerja dan jatuh temponya perusahaan memiliki beberapa syarat berdasarkan keputusan pengadilan hubungan preindustrial. Menggunakan jenis penilitian yuridis-normatif, sumber data sekunder. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kepustakaan untuk mengumpulkan data. Kemudian data diolah serta dikaitkan dengan berbagai data sehingga menjadi kesimpulan yang memiliki makna. Ketidak mampuan perusahaan membayarkan piutang terhadap kreditur yang memberikan pinjaman menyebabkan perusahaan tersebut menjadi pailit, pailitnya perusahaan menyebabkan pekerja-pekerja yang diperusahaan itu mengalami PHK. Perusahaan yang mem PHK pekerja berkewajiban membayarkan sejumlah uang kepada pekerja tersebut dan kewajiban pembayaran itu termasuk kedalam hutang perusahaan kepada pekerja, namun kewajiban tersebut memiliki syarat-syarat waktu jatuh tempo yang diatur oleh keputusan pengadilan hubungan preindustrial. Menurut putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN Niaga Mdn dan putusan Nomor 8/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019/PN Niaga Mdn, perusahaan berkewajibkan membayar utang kepada pekerja dikarenakan perusahaan tersebut mengalami pailit dan memiliki rentang waktu untuk melakukan pembayaran piutang tersebut dimana diatur pada UU No 37 Tahun 2004.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PEMBAYARAN DENDA TILANG DENGAN SISTEM ELECTRONIC TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT ( ETLE ) Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi; Togar Mangapul Manurung; Andreas Candra
MIZAN, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 1 (2022): Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32503/mizan.v11i1.2464

Abstract

Pada saat ini masih banyak pengguna jalan raya khususnya pengendara yang kerap melakukan pelanggaran peraturan lalu lintas. Akibat dari adanya kesalahan berlalulintas, maka dengan ini Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia khususnya dibidang satuan lalulintas menerapkan sistem ETLE sebagai sanksi dalam bentuk penilangan yang tertuang pada UU Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 mengenai Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan (LLAJ). Dalam penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif deskriptif. Metode pengumpulan data dalam penulisan makalah ini adalah metode penelitian kepustakaan. Pada penelitian ini menggunakan analisis data dengan metode kuantitatif yang menghasilkan data deskriptif analitis. Penerapan sistem ETLE sebagai sanksi berupa denda telah dilaksanakan dengan baik dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 22 (LLAJ) Tahun 2009 tentang Angkutan Jalan. Dalam pelaksaan sistem ini perlu diketahui bahwa adanya suatu asas hukum yaitu Asas “lex specialis derogat legi generali” yaitu hukum secara khusus didahulukan daripada hukum secara umum. Dimana kita ketahui asas hukum semacam ini menjadi penguat pertanggungjawaban hukum yang akan disanksikan kepada pelanggar lalu lintas.
Tinjauan Yuridis Pengadaan Barang/Jasa pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Putusan No. 28/PID.SUS-TPK/2022.PN.MDN) Julianus Lase; Karto Simamora; Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi; Ahmad Feri Tanjung
Jurnal Ilmiah Dikdaya Vol 13, No 1 (2023): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/dikdaya.v13i1.433

Abstract

:  Since the announcement of the positive case of Covid-19 in Indonesia on March 2 2020, the government has stepped up steps to handle procurement of government goods and services amid the global Covid-19 pandemic. Presidential Decree No. 4 of 2020. Ordered all Ministries to act quickly, precisely, centrally and simultaneously. Provision of services and goods to accelerate the reduction of the virus. Legal Basis for the Implementation of services and goods, Presidential Regulation No. 16 of 2018 concerning the Implementation of Government services and goods. Based on Article 59 of Presidential Decree No. 59. Government Institution Number 16 of 2018 (LKPP) No 13 of 2018 concerning the Implementation of Government services and goods for Emergency Response. (SE Head of LKPP) Interpretation No 3 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of Provision of services and goods for Pandemic Efforts. The purpose of this research is to find out the implementation of services and goods during the Covid19 pandemic. Study the Policy Institute for the Implementation of Government goods and services. Learn more about the steps taken by the ministry to accelerate the delivery of services and goods. The technique used to collect data is the use of literature studies, but also used legal materials. The data analysis used is prescriptive data analysis. The research theory used is the theory of the implementation of government services and goods during a pandemic, namely the Ministry to do it quickly, precisely, focused, and coordinated.  
Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Kasus Korupsi oleh Direktur PT Beringin Bangun Utama dalam Surat Putusan No. 64/Pid.Sus/Tpk/2016/Pn.Bgl Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi; Yuli Rosanti Sartika Sitompul; Rima Ara Rizki
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), November
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (276.359 KB) | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v5i2.1316

Abstract

This study aims to determine the criminal responsibility for corruption cases by the director of PT Beringin Bangun Utama (Study of Decision Number 64/Pid.Sus/TPK/2016/PN.Bgl). The problem is focused on the form of losses suffered by the state, penalties and criminal responsibility for corruption cases by the director of PT Beringin Bangun Utama. In order to approach the problem, normative juridical theory is used as a reference. The data were collected through literature studies, decisions and previous research and then analyzed qualitatively. This study concludes that losses to the state caused by the actions of the director of PT Beringin Bangun Utama in the financial and economic sectors are elements that are included in the category of a criminal act of corruption. The legal action given is in the form of disbanding the corporation, confiscation of documents and being threatened with crime in accordance with Article 2 Paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 20 in conjunction with Article 18 of Law no. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes which has been amended by Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption. And in the second indictment where the defendant was threatened with a crime in Article 3 in conjunction with Article 6 in conjunction with Article 7 of Law no. 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering.