M. Rachmad R
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Defisit Anggaran dan Implikasinya terhadap Perkembangan Ekonomi dan Kinerja Keuangan Kabupaten Tebo Astuti Prihatiningsih; M. Rachmad R; Syamsuddin HM
Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan Daerah Vol. 1 No. 2 (2013): Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan Daerah
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Ekonomi Pascasarjana Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (453.408 KB) | DOI: 10.22437/ppd.v1i2.1499

Abstract

This study aims to 1) To analyze the determinants that will influence the budget deficit in Tebo district budget. 2) To analyze whether there is a correlation between the budget deficit with Tebo regency economic development. 3) To analyze whether there is a correlation between the financial performance of the budget deficit with Tebo regency. The method used in this study is a secondary data analysis methods. Based on the results of testing the model regression shows the value of the F-count is high at 12 130. With an alpha of 0.05 df1 = 3, DF2 = 4 obtained F-table at 6:59. so the F-count> F-table. this indicates that the independent variables are jointly significant effect on the dependent variable, so that personnel expenditure, capital expenditure and spending on goods and services during the period 2004-2011 are jointly significant effect on the budget deficit in Tebo regency. Each there is an increase of 1 billion budget deficit, it will cause a reduction in personnel expenses amounted to 4.52 billion Tebo regency. Any increased capital expenditure budget of 1 billion budget deficit will increase by 5.01 billion. Any increased budget allocation of goods and services amounted to 1 billion, the budget deficit will increase by 8.17 billion. the greatest influence on the budget deficit from the budget allocation of goods and services. The results of the analysis of the budget deficit relationship with economic development in Tebo regency during 2006-2010 showed that the budget deficit by using a simple Pearson correlation test has a relationship of -0.07986. These results illustrate that the budget deficit has a negative relationship with economic development. The results of the analysis of the relationship with the budget deficit in the region's financial performance during the period 2006-2010 Tebo regency showed that the budget deficit with the financial performance using tools Pearson correlation test has a relationship of -0.04703. The results illustrate that the budget deficit has a negative relationship with financial performance.   Keywords: budget deficit, budget allocation, capital expenditure budget
Analisis penerimaan pajak bumi dan bangunan-P2 serta pengaruhnya terhadap pendapatan daerah Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Jambi Setiawan, Budi; R, M. Rachmad; Delis, Arman
Jurnal Paradigma Ekonomika Vol. 15 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Paradigma Ekonomika
Publisher : Program Studi Ekonomi Pembangunan Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/paradigma.v15i2.10320

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the determinants of PBB-P2 revenue, to determine the effect of PBB-P2 revenue on regional revenue and to formulate strategies for increasing PBB-P2 revenue in Jambi Province. The data used in this study is secondary data with the type of Time series 2014-2018 data and Cross Section 11 districts/cities that come from the Central Statistics Agency and Regency / City BPPRD. This study uses Panel Data Regression Analysis and uses Simple Linear Regression using the E-Views 8.0 tool. The results of this study indicate that PBB-P2 always increases every year. From the results of panel data regression analysis, the results show that investment, economic growth, and taxpayers together have a significant effect on PBB-P2 with an R square value of 0.924, the Prob value (F- statistic) 0,000 and the F-statistic value is 26,556. The effect of investment on PBB-P2 has a positive effect, which means that if investment increases, PBB-P2 will also experience an increase. Economic growth and taxpayers will have a negative effect on PBB-P2 which means that the increase in PBB-P2 will decrease the economic growth and taxpayers.