Endah Budi Rahaju
Mathematics Department, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PROFIL BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF SISWA SMA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS-MATEMATIS Sophia Maulidatul Adha; Endah Budi Rahaju
JURNAL PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA DAN SAINS Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): Vol. 4, No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jppms.v4n2.p61-71

Abstract

Berpikir reflektif merupakan salah satu bagian dari berpikir tingkat tinggi. Tahapan berpikir reflektif menurut Rodgers terdiri atas tahap presence to experience, tahap description of experience, tahap analysis of experience, dan tahap intelligent action/experimentation. Berpikir reflektif berperan penting sebagai sarana untuk mendorong pemikiran siswa dalam situasi pemecahan masalah. Salah satu bentuk masalah matematika adalah soal cerita. Proses berpikir reflektif siswa dalam memecahkan soal cerita dipengaruhi oleh banyak faktor, salah satunya adalah kecerdasan logis-matematis. Kecerdasan logis-matematis dapat diukur dengan Angket Kecerdasan Majemuk dan dikelompokkan menjadi tiga kelompok, yaitu kecerdasan logis-matematis tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif yang bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan profil berpikir reflektif siswa SMA berkecerdasan logis-matematis tinggi, sedang, dan rendah dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas tiga siswa kelas XI MAN 1 Gresik Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020 dengan kecerdasan logis-matematis yang berbeda. Data penelitian dikumpulkan dengan angket kecerdasan majemuk, tugas pemecahan masalah, dan pedoman wawancara. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan berpikir reflektif antara siswa berkecerdasan logis-matematis tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Siswa berkecerdasan logis-matematis tinggi dan sedang sudah berpikir reflektif karena telah memenuhi seluruh indikator pada setiap tahapan berpikir reflektif Rodgers. Sedangkan siswa berkecerdasan logis-matematis rendah belum berpikir reflektif karena siswa belum memenuhi satu indikator berpikir reflektif pada tahap presence of experience dan empat indikator pada tahap intelligent action/experimentation.Kata kunci: Berpikir Reflektif, Masalah Matematika, Kecerdasan Logis-Matematis. Reflective thinking is one of the part of higher order thinking. According to Rodgers, the stage of reflective thinking are consists of the four statement, the first is presence to experience stage, the second is description of experience stage, the third is analysis of experience stage, and the last is intelligent action/experimentation stage. Reflective thinking plays an important role as a means to encourage student thinking in problem-solving situations. However, mathematical problems themselves have various forms, the various forms themselves is one of which is a story problem. The reflective thinking process of students in the term of solving problems with story problems is influenced by many factors, one of the factors is logical-mathematical intelligence. Logical-mathematical intelligence can be measured by using a Multiple Intelligence Questionnaire and grouped into three groups, there are high, medium, and low logical-mathematical intelligence. This research is using descriptive analysis study with a qualitative approach that aims to describe the reflective thinking profile of high school students with the three categories which include high, medium, and low logical-mathematical intelligence in solving math problems. The subjects of this research consisted of 3 class XI students of MAN 1 Gresik for the 2019/2020 academic year, the subjects representing students with distinct logical-mathematical intelligence. The research data used in this study were collected by using multiple intelligence questionnaires, problem-solving tasks, and interview guides. The results of this research show that there were differences in reflective thinking abilities between subjects with high, medium, and low logical-mathematical intelligence. Furthermore, subjects with high and moderate logical-mathematical intelligence can think reflectively because they have met all the indicators at each stage of Rodgers' reflective thinking. Meanwhile, subjects with low logical-mathematical intelligence are still less capable of reflective thinking. However, the subject has not fulfilled one indicator in the present to experience stage and four indicators in the intelligence action/experimentation stage.Keywords: Reflective Thinking, Mathematics Problem, Logical-mathematical Intelligence.
Proses Berpikir Siswa SMA dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient Raras Lusianisita; Endah Budi Rahaju
JURNAL PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA DAN SAINS Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): Vol. 4, No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jppms.v4n2.p93-102

Abstract

Perbedaan proses berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika dapat dipengaruhi oleh Adversity Quotient. Adversity Quotient adalah suatu kecerdasan dan kemampuan seseorang untuk menghadapi kesulitan atau hambatan yang berpengaruh terhadap keberhasilan seseorang. Penelitian ini menggunakan tiga tahapan proses berpikir yang meliputi (1) penerimaan informasi, (2) pengolahan informasi, dan (3) pembentukan kesimpulan. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan proses berpikir siswa SMA tingkat climbers dan campers dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu Adversity Response Profile, Soal matematika, dan pedoman wawancara. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada siswa kelas X SMA secara online, akibatnya hanya mendapatkan dua dari tiga tipe Adversity Quotient yaitu climbers dan campers. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa siswa climbers maupun campers mampu melakukan semua tahapan proses berpikir dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika yaitu penerimaan informasi, pengolahan informasi, dan pembentukan kesimpulan. Siswa climbers dan campers pada saat penerimaan informasi membaca soal dengan cermat. Siswa climbers membaca cukup sekali, sedangkan siswa campers membaca soal tiga sampai empat kali. Namun pada saat tahap pengolahan informasi pada salah satu soal, siswa climbers mengerjakannya sebanyak tiga kali sampai menemukan hasil yang benar. Siswa campers sempat ada kesalahan dalam menemukan hasil penyelesaian, tetapi dapat memberikan alasan melakukan kesalahan tersebut serta memperbaikinya dengan benar. Siswa climbers dapat membuat kesimpulan dari soal yang diberikan meskipun pada lembar jawaban tidak dituliskan himpunan penyelesaiannya. Berbeda dengan siswa campers yang dapat melakukannya dengan memberikan himpunan penyelesaian yang tepat.Kata Kunci: proses berpikir, menyelesaikan soal matematika, adversity quotientThe thought process is a series of mental activities carried out by a person to get new information and to solve a problem. The differences in students' thought processes in solving mathematics questions can be affected by Adversity Quotient. Adversity Quotient is a person's intelligence and ability to face difficulties or obstacles that affect one's success. This research uses three stages of a thinking process which includes (1) receiving information, (2) processing information, and (3) forming conclusions. The purpose of this research was to describe the thinking process of high school students at climbers and campers level in solving mathematics questions. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The instruments used were the Adversity Response Profile, mathematics questions, and interview guidelines. This research was held online for high school students in grade 10. As a result, only two of the three types of Adversity Quotient, namely climbers and campers. The results of this research indicated that both climbers and campers students were able to perform all stages of the thinking process in solving math problems, namely receiving information, processing information, and forming conclusions. Climbers and campers students at the time of receiving information, read the questions carefully. Climbers students read once enough, while campers students read the questions three to four times. However, at the information processing stage on one of the questions, climbers students did it three times until they found the correct result. Also, student campers had errors in finding the solution but could provide reasons for making these mistakes and solve them correctly. In the forming conclusion, climbers and campers students carried out the predetermined plan well. Climbers students can make conclusions from the questions given even though in the answer sheet is not written the set of solutions. Unlike the campers student who can do this by providing the correct set of solutions.Keywords: thought process, solving mathematics questions, adversity quotient