Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Al-Mada: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, dan Budaya Kordinat : Jurnal Komunikasi antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam
Rachma Vina Tsurayya
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
TAUHIDIC PARADIGM SEBAGAI BASIS DALAM MEWUJUDKAN UMAT BERAGAMA YANG TOLERAN DAN MODERAT Nuzul Fitriansyah; Rachma Vina Tsurayya
Al-Mada: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, dan Budaya Vol 3 No 1 (2020): Agama, Sosial dan Budaya
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pesantren KH. Abdul Chalim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (383.468 KB) | DOI: 10.31538/almada.v3i1.480

Abstract

The issue of religion and tolerance is always interesting to discuss if we know that someone should be more religious, then more tolerant of his attitude towards others. However, various facts that have occurred in the past few decades indicate that the average cases of intolerance are caused by some individuals who misunderstand the concept of religion even to monopolize a truth. The existence of these facts does not mean making religion a scapegoat that can make a person intolerant, more precisely this happens because of the misunderstanding when someone understands some of the concepts that exist in religion itself. One concept that is the core of any religion is the concept of divinity. In Islam the concept of divinity is known as Tawheed which teaches to disperse God. Some muffasir who take focus in the domain of Liberation Interpretation usually use this monotheistic paradigm as the basis of liberation, say for example Amina Wadud with the issue of rejection of patriarchal culture or Farid Essack who uses this paradigm in eradicating apartheid (discrimination against blacks) that occurs in Africa . Therefore in this case the author tries to offer the use of this monotheistic paradigm to minimize the level of intolerance that occurs due to the existence of miss understanding in understanding religious concepts, where the monotheistic paradigm directs that the true human dignity is the same in the eyes of God so that such views are expected can suppress intolerance and monopoly on truth in the name of religion.
Hadis Ilmu Dalam Pandangan Syiah-Sunni: Perbandingan dan Implementasinya Di Ranah Akademik Rachma Vina Tsurayya
Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam Vol 19, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Komunikasi Antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam
Publisher : Kopertais Wilayah I DKI Jakarta dan Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/kordinat.v19i1.17790

Abstract

Sunni-Syiah merupakan dua golongan yang seakan dihalangi oleh tembok besar yang menjadikannya tidak bisa saling menjangkau. Keduanya sama-sama memiliki hadis yang menjadi pedoman primer setelah al-Qur’an, yang dalam pembahsan ini mengambil tema hadis ilmu. Hadis nabi merupakan sesuatu yang menjadi patokan umat Islam, baik dalam pandangan syiah maupun dalam pandangan sunni. Perbedaanya disini adalah status hadis yang dapat digunakan menurut sunni maupun syiah. Pada makalah ini, penulis akan membahas tentang hadis Ilmu dalam pandangan syiah dan sunni berdasarkan dua kitab hadis masing-masing yakni kitab Ushul al-Kafi dan Shahih Muslim, yang kemudian akan diketahui perbedaan, persamaan atau titik terang dari keduanya dan akan memberikan sedikit solusi untuk mendamaikan dua kelompok besar yang tidak berhenti berseteru ini, karena setiap muslim memiliki hak untuk mendapatkan perlindungan harta dan jiwa. Serta akan diketahui bagaimana implementasinya bagi kehidupan mahasiswa (akademik)
POLIGAMI DALAM PERSPEKTIF FAKHR AL-DÎN AL-RÂZÎ DAN FAQIHUDDIN ABDUL KODIR Rachma Vina Tsurayya
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol 20, No 2 (2019): Juli
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (585.882 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/qh.2019.2002-05

Abstract

One of the religious and social issues that is intriguing and interesting to discuss is polygamy with various differences of opinion in it. This article will compare polygamy in the view of two classical and contemporary scholars, Fakhrudin Ar-Rozi and Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir. The background to the selection of these two figures is due to their opinions in the interpretation of the polygamy verse which is different from most commentators. In this verse we will discuss classical polygamy verse interpretation, verse background, and contemporary polygamy interpretation and then examine the contextualisation in this modern era and can see a more moderate interpretation by comparing them. This study concludes that the problem of polygamy is no longer focused on the underlying motives, but rather on the impact experienced by his wife and children. The interpretation of al-Râzî and Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir has been able to represent the voicing of women's rights in polygamy. This does not get the agreement of all parties, in the sense that there will still be parties that allow it for different reasons. However, the existence of this analysis can help each party to be more sensitive to the reality experienced by women. al-Râzî and Abdul Kodir are on a linear line that has severe conditions for permitting polygamy and encouraging other worship. Although both of them use different approaches and perspectives, they produce thoughts which in the author’s view are almost the same. Keyword: Polygamy; Contextualization; Moderation
Co-Authors Nuzul Fitriansyah