Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nagari Law Review Journal of Law Perspectives Review
Agung Hermansyah
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Konstitusionalitas Pengaturan Hak Ulayat Dalam Peraturan Nagari Agung Hermansyah; Romi Armezi
Nagari Law Review Vol 1 No 1 (2017): Nagari Law Review (NALREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.1.i.1.p.97-106.2017

Abstract

Pasca ditetapkannya UU No. 12 Tahun 2011, Peraturan Nagari tidak lagi diakui dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Padahal jika merujuk pada Pasal 18 B ayat (2) UUD NRI 1945 pemerintah wajib mengakui keberadaan masyarakat hukum adat berikut hak tradisionalnya. Dalam konteks otonomi daerah, jika dikaitkan dengan Pasal 18 ayat (6) UUD NRI 1945 bentuk pengakuan pemerintah kepada desa sebagai bagian dari pemerintahan daerah idealnya berupa hak untuk mengatur dan mengurus sendiri urusan rumah tangganya. Sebagai lex specialis, Pasal 26 ayat (2) huruf d UU No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa juga menegaskan hak nagari untuk membentuk peraturan otonominya. Sebagai solusi, sebenarnya Pasal 8 ayat (1) UU No. 12 Tahun 2011 sebenarnya mengakui keberadaan peraturan nagari yang dibentuk atas kewenangan yang bersumber dari perundang-undangan. Dalam implementasinya, pembentukan peraturan nagari terutama yang berkenaan dengan hak asal-usul/ulayat di Sumatera Barat mengalami kendala ytang signifikan. Meski MK melalui putusan PUU No.35/2012 menetapkan kewenangan itu ada di tangan nagari, dalam pelaksanaannya kewenangan dimaksud dibatasi secara bersyarat oleh pemerintah.
The Power of a Medical Record Certificate from a Doctor as Evidence of Domestic Violence (KDRT) in Divorce Cases: A Perspective on Legal Considerations of Court Decisions Agung Hermansyah; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar; Slamet Tri Wahyudi
Journal of Law Perspectives Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Catalist Indo Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64670/jlpr.v2i2.92

Abstract

This study examines the legal position and evidentiary strength of medical record certificates as proof of domestic violence (KDRT) in divorce cases within the Indonesian legal system. Divorce in Indonesia must be based on valid and provable reasons, including domestic violence, which presents complex evidentiary challenges, especially when visum et repertum is unavailable. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, supported by secondary data from legislation, court decisions, and legal literature. The findings indicate that medical record certificates are juridically recognized as written evidence within civil procedural law. However, their evidentiary value is not absolute but categorized as free evidence (vrij bewijs), meaning their strength depends on judicial assessment. Unlike visum et repertum, medical records are not specifically created for legal purposes, which limits their probative value. In judicial practice, judges tend to treat medical records as supporting or circumstantial evidence that must be corroborated by other forms of proof, such as witness testimony or party statements. Court decisions demonstrate that judges prioritize the relevance, consistency, and causal relationship between medical findings and alleged acts of violence. Therefore, medical records cannot stand alone as decisive evidence but play an important role in strengthening the overall evidentiary framework. This study highlights the need for careful judicial consideration and greater clarity regarding the use of medical documents in proving domestic violence in divorce proceedings.
Co-Authors Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Romi Armezi Slamet Tri Wahyudi