Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AGRITEXTS: Journal of Agricultural Extension
Arip Wijianto
Penyuluhan dan Komunikasi Pertanian, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
SOSIALISASI GERAKAN PENGEMBANGAN KAWASAN AGROPOLITAN PROGRAM TO THE FARMER Yanuarti Hapsari; Arip Wijianto; Sutarto Sutarto
AGRITEXTS: Journal of Agricultural Extension Vol 40, No 1 (2016): May
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1127.715 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/agritexts.v40i1.42664

Abstract

The aimed of this research is to know how the socialization Gerakan Pengembangan Kawasan Agropolitan (GPKA) Program, knowing constraint delayed on socialization   Movement Development Program of Agropolitan Dictrict (SMAD), and knowing the way of socialization  Gerakan Pengembangan Kawasan Agropolitan (GPKA) Program Regency of Boyolali. The method are used is kualitative with descriptive approach. Location of this research used purposive ways that on Regency of Boyolali. From Regency of Boyolali was choosen two subdistrict, that is subdistrict of Ampel and Boyolali. The informan are used with purposive ways and snowball sampling. The sources data its come from the informan, place and activities and also document/archieve. Whereas the technique to collected data had done with interview, observation, and content analysis. To measure of data used triangulation data (sources). The data was analysed by using reduction data, saw data, and verification.The result of this research showing that The Sosialization Gerakan Pengembangan Kawasan Agropolitan (GPKA) Program had done with elucidation/companionship with group farmer/GAPOKTAN, PPL, and official related, training, and contiguous. Constraint that fight are amount personil in concerned stint, presence either one staf section Agribisnis mutation, the farmer not all known about the GPKA program, cost limit for activity GPKA program, the farmer activity, and the farmer whole lot have same view and attitude about GPKA. The way used are coordinating amount personil in concerned, giving suggestion to tow removal the staf involved, the change information with farmer other, make proposal for GPKA Program, and coordination across sector intensived and contiguous.
SIKAP PETANI TERHADAP GABUNGAN KELOMPOK TANI (GAPOKTAN) Yunus Puratmoko; Kusnandar Kusnandar; Arip Wijianto
AGRITEXTS: Journal of Agricultural Extension Vol 40, No 1 (2016): May
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1347.403 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/agritexts.v40i1.42665

Abstract

This research aim to study farmer’s attitude to Gapoktan, studying farmer’s former factors for attitude to Gapoktan and study the relation between farmer’s former factors for attitude with its attitude to Gapoktan. Basic method used by quantitative research method with survay technique. Research location determined by purposive that is in District of Banyudono Sub Province Boyolali. Withdrawal of sample done by Stratified Random Sampling, chosen three Countryside they were Tanjungsari, Banyudono and Batan. After obtained by countryside is later taken by proportional random sampling, for the farmer sample a number of 40 by Random. Type and data source cover primary data and sekunder data. Analysis method used to know the farmer’s former factor for attitude and farmer’s attitude to Gapoktan is class wide formula. While to test relation between farmer’s former factors for attitude with its attitude to Gapoktan use Rank Spearman correlation analysis.Result of research indicate that farmer’s attitude to Gapoktan pertained goodness. From result of Rank Spearman analysis and significance test at trust level 95% personal experience do not significant with farmer’s attitude to Gapoktan assess correlation coefficient (-0,174). While lionized others influence (0,443), formal education (0,442) and of non formal education (0,469), or significant and correlate positive with farmer’s attitude to Gapoktan.
Co-Authors Kusnandar Kusnandar Sutarto Sutarto Yanuarti Hapsari Yunus Puratmoko