Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nun : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Tafsir di Nusantara Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara
M. Zia Al-Ayyubi
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Religion Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Ziarah Kubur Perspektif Pendekatan Historis-Sosiologis dan Kontekstualisasinya dalam Kehidupan Kotemporer M. Zia Al-Ayyubi; Muhammad Munif
Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara Vol 3, No 1 (2021): JSHN VOL 3 NO 1 JUNI 2021
Publisher : IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/jshn.v3i1.9022

Abstract

The current phenomenon of grave pilgrimage has caused reactions from various circles of society at large. There are differences of opinion (Khilafah) regarding the laws of the grave pilgrimage. The two opinions contradict each other. This is because there are different interpretations in studying one of the hadith texts as a source of istidlal law. The results of the hadith research show that the hadith about the grave pilgrimage that was endorsed by Imam Muslim in the Shohih Muslim book is of sahih quality. This is of course after going through the research steps of the hadith sanad. Then the contextualization of the hadith is related to the hadith which states that grave pilgrimage is not allowed. Therefore, in solving khilafiyah problem regarding the law of pilgrimage, if there is someone who does not agree, then do not simply punish that person with the label bid’ah. However, when differences arise, it would be nice to explore the arguments of naqli and ‘aqli so that compromises can then be made. So that in the end, Muslims are not easily divided when there is a Khilafah.
Epistemologi Tafsir Ayat-ayat Jihad: Studi Pemikiran Muhammad Chirzin dan Sahiron Syamsuddin Tomi Liansi; M. Zia Al-Ayyubi
Nun: Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Tafsir di Nusantara Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Asosiasi Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir se-Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32495/nun.v8i1.307

Abstract

Jihad in the recent decade has become a sensitive issue due to misconceptions rooted in a literal understanding that associates jihad with religious violence, an idea that is frequently referred to as 'holy terrorism.' In reality, jihad has a broader meaning that is not synonymous with violence or war. This study discusses the interpretations of two important figures in Qur'anic and Tafsir scholarship in Indonesia today, namely Muhammad Chirzin and Sahiron Syamsuddin, in order to reveal the meaning of jihad and examine the construction of thought that underpins that meaning, particularly in the Indonesian context. The question that will be studied by this paper is how the thoughts of the two figures in interpreting the verses of jihad and how the epistemological structure of the interpretation of the verses of jihad of the two figures? To answer these questions, this article uses a historical-factual approach. This paper contends that the two figures discussed have conducted extensive research on the concept of jihad, and the results of their interpretations disprove the identical association between jihad and war. According to Muhammad Chirzin, the object of jihad is all forms of evil, so jihad for him takes two forms: policy socialization and internalization (amar makruf) and prevention and elimination of evil (nahi munkar). Meanwhile, Sahiron Syamsuddin defines jihad as the removal of oppression, the preservation of religious freedom, and the establishment of peace. These two figures demonstrate that jihad, when studied thoroughly using valid academic instruments, does not justify violence and terrorism.
Co-Authors Muhammad Munif Tomi Liansi