Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Muhammadiyah International Journal of Economics and Business
Thalia Purwita Anggraini
Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang
Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
THE EFFECT OF PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM, EXPERTISE, AUDIT FEE, AND AUDIT RISK ON AUDITOR’S OPINION WITH CLIENT PREFERENCE AS MODERATOR Betri Sirajuddin; Thalia Purwita Anggraini
Muhammadiyah International Journal of Economics and Business Vol. 2, No.1, 2019
Publisher : Asosiasi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to determine the effect of professional skepticism, expertise, audit fee, audit risk on the auditor’s opinion, and to determine preference client as the moderating variable on the effect of professional skepticism, expertise, audit fee, and audit risk on the auditor’s opinion. It is an empirical study on the public accountant firms and the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK RI) Representative Office in Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia. This study developed associative hypotheses and tested them. The data consisted of primary data and secondary data. The population of this research was the auditors of public accountant firms and BPK RI in Palembang. Totally, 111 respondents were involved. The techniques used for collecting the data were in-depth interviews, questionnaires, and documentation. The techniques used for analyzing the data were quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis. This study indicates that professional skepticism insignificantly affects  the auditor’s opinion, expertise significantly affects the auditor’s opinion, audit fee significantly affects the auditor’s opinion, and audit risk significantly affects the auditor’s opinion. Furthermore, there is no significant relationship on the auditor’s opinion from the interaction between the client preference and professional skepticism and expertise. Meanwhile, client preference is a quasi-moderator on the influence of audit fee and audit risk on the auditor’s opinion.
Co-Authors Betri Sirajuddin