Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PELAKSANAAN PIDANA MINIMUM KHUSUS DALAM PERKARA ANAK DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI PEKANBARU Rizky, Fauzi; Ridwan, Mukhlis; *, Erdiansyah
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2014): Wisuda Oktober 2014
Publisher : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACTSetting a minimum penalty of this particular provide restrictions on freedom did the judge in the verdict , the District Court judge's ruling presence Pekanbaru containing about criminal punishment under the age of criminal defendants specifically towards children who are threatened specifically in violation of minimum criminal provisions of Article 81 paragraph ( 2 ) of Law Act No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection. Then there are three formulation of the problem in writing this essay: How specialized in the implementation of minimum criminal case law child region of the District Court of Pekanbaru?, How considerations judges in criminal punishment under special minimum punishment in the case of children in the jurisdiction of the Court Pekanbaru country?, What barriers and efforts to overcome obstacles in the imposition of criminal punishment under special minimum in the case of children in the region of the Law Court of Pekanbaru?The research method in this study. Sociological type and legal research is descriptive. The location research of the District Court of Pekanbaru , sources supported by primary and secondary. The data collection techniques used were interviews and review of literature . After collected was then analyzed qualitatively , and draw conclusions with deductive thinking method is to analyze the problems of the general form to a specific shape.From the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded that , first , implementation of minimum criminal jurisdiction in the District Court of Pekanbaru there are 4 ( four ) children who are threatened criminal case specific minimum , one of which impose criminal punishment under special minimum . The second consideration is divided into 2 ( two ) , the consideration of judicial and non- judicial considerations . Third Barriers include : obstacles in terms of evidence and the scope of a certain age , mental limitations in the soul of the child testified in court , it is difficult to achieve peace , and effort to overcome barriers: law enforcement can corroborate the testimony of victims by using clues , while the child's limited mental ability in providing information , can be accompanied by an expert witness who is a psychologist, in terms of insiders, the judge approached the family of the victim so that the presence of peace .Keywords : Implementation of Special Minimum - Criminal – Child Case
PELAKSANAAN PIDANA MINIMUM KHUSUS DALAM PERKARA ANAK DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI PEKANBARU Fauzi Rizky; Mukhlis R; Erdiansyah '
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2014): Wisuda Oktober 2014
Publisher : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Setting a minimum penalty of this particular provide restrictions on freedom did the judge in the verdict , the District Court judge's ruling presence Pekanbaru containing about criminal punishment under the age of criminal defendants specifically towards children who are threatened specifically in violation of minimum criminal provisions of Article 81 paragraph ( 2 ) of Law Act No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection. Then there are three formulation of the problem in writing this essay: How specialized in the implementation of minimum criminal case law child region of the District Court of Pekanbaru?, How considerations judges in criminal punishment under special minimum punishment in the case of children in the jurisdiction of the Court Pekanbaru country?, What barriers and efforts to overcome obstacles in the imposition of criminal punishment under special minimum in the case of children in the region of the Law Court of Pekanbaru?The research method in this study. Sociological type and legal research is descriptive. The location research of the District Court of Pekanbaru , sources supported by primary and secondary. The data collection techniques used were interviews and review of literature . After collected was then analyzed qualitatively , and draw conclusions with deductive thinking method is to analyze the problems of the general form to a specific shape.From the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded that , first , implementation of minimum criminal jurisdiction in the District Court of Pekanbaru there are 4 ( four ) children who are threatened criminal case specific minimum , one of which impose criminal punishment under special minimum . The second consideration is divided into 2 ( two ) , the consideration of judicial and non- judicial considerations . Third Barriers include : obstacles in terms of evidence and the scope of a certain age , mental limitations in the soul of the child testified in court , it is difficult to achieve peace , and effort to overcome barriers: law enforcement can corroborate the testimony of victims by using clues , while the child's limited mental ability in providing information , can be accompanied by an expert witness who is a psychologist, in terms of insiders, the judge approached the family of the victim so that the presence of peace .Keywords : Implementation of Special Minimum - Criminal – Child Case
PELAKSANAAN REHABILITASI TERHADAP PECANDU, PENYALAHGUNA DAN KORBAN NARKOTIKA Fauzi Rizky
Riau Law Journal Vol 1, No 1 (2017): Riau Law Journal
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (389.028 KB) | DOI: 10.30652/rlj.v1i1.4180

Abstract

AbstrakPelaksanaan rehabilitasi narkoba mengacu pada ketentuan Pasal 127 jo Pasal 54 Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika yang menyatakan bahwa pelaku pelanggaran dapat dibuktikan atau terbukti menjadi korban penyalahgunaan narkotika, Penyalahgunaan Guna harus menjalani Rehabilitasi medis dan rehabilitasi sosial dan pecandu narkotika dan korban penyalahgunaan obat-obatan yang dibutuhkan untuk menjalani rehabilitasi medis dan rehabilitasi sosial yang dilaksanakan baik oleh pemerintah maupun pihak swasta untuk bekerja sama dengan pemerintah. Pelaksanaan rehabilitasi harus memenuhi syarat dari Peraturan Pelaksana lainnya, termasuk yang sudah memiliki Tim Penilai Terintegrasi Rekomendasi, namun masih banyak rekomendasi yang tidak berjalan sebagaimana mestinya. Jenis penelitian ini dapat diklasifikasikan sebagai penelitian hukum sosiologis, karena penulis secara langsung melakukan penelitian terhadap lokasi atau yang diteliti untuk memberikan penelitian yang lengkap dan jelas dilakukan di Badan Narkotika Nasional Provinsi Riau dan Kejaksaan Negeri Siak.Kata Kunci: Rehabilitasi, narkotika, rekomendasi Tim Assessment. AbstractImplementation of Rehabilitation Narcotics refer to the provisions of Article 127 Jo Article 54 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 Year 2009 on Narcotics pronouncing that abusers can be proved or proved to be the victim of abuse of narcotics, Abuse Guna shall undergo medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation and addict narcotics and victims the abuse of drugs required to undergo medical rehabilitation and social rehabilitation rehabilitation instituted both provided by the government or private parties to cooperate with the government. Implementation of rehabilitation should be qualified from the other Implementing Regulations, including already has Recommendation Integrated Assessment Team, but still banya recommendations are not running as they should. This type of research can be classified sociological law research, because this research author directly conduct research on the location or point examined in order to provide a complete and clear picture of the issues examined. This research was conducted at the National Narcotics Agency of Riau Province and the State Attorney Siak.Keywords: Rehabilitation,  narcotics Team Assessment-Recommendation