Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Eksistensi dan Karakteristik Putusan Bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi Rahman, Faiz; Wicaksono, Dian Agung
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

The result of this legal research show the existence of conditionally constitutional and conditionally unconstitutional decision in reviewing laws from 2003 to 2015, although that model of decision is not regulated in the positive law. There are 5 characteristics of conditionally constitutional decision, those are (1) Court gives interpretation or certain requirements in order to remain constitutional provisions tested throughout implemented according to the specified requirements of the Constitutional Court; (2) based on the rejected verdict; (3) a conditionally constitutional clause can be found only on the consideration of the Court, or can be found on the judgment and injunction; (4) conditionally constitutional decision require re-judicial review if the norm is not in line with the interpretation of the Constitutional Court; (5) encouraging legislative review. Regarding the conditionally unconstitutional decision, there are 4 characteristics, those are (1) the verdict certainly include a conditionally unconstitutional clause; (2) a conditionally verdict can be the meaning or interpretation of a norm, or give the terms of the norm is unconstitutional; (3) based on the granted verdict either partially or completely; (4) does not substantially different from the conditionally constitutional clause.

Eksistensi dan Karakteristik Putusan Bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi Faiz Rahman; Dian Agung Wicaksono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The result of this legal research show the existence of conditionally constitutional and conditionally unconstitutional decision in reviewing laws from 2003 to 2015, although that model of decision is not regulated in the positive law. There are 5 characteristics of conditionally constitutional decision, those are (1) Court gives interpretation or certain requirements in order to remain constitutional provisions tested throughout implemented according to the specified requirements of the Constitutional Court; (2) based on the rejected verdict; (3) a conditionally constitutional clause can be found only on the consideration of the Court, or can be found on the judgment and injunction; (4) conditionally constitutional decision require re-judicial review if the norm is not in line with the interpretation of the Constitutional Court; (5) encouraging legislative review. Regarding the conditionally unconstitutional decision, there are 4 characteristics, those are (1) the verdict certainly include a conditionally unconstitutional clause; (2) a conditionally verdict can be the meaning or interpretation of a norm, or give the terms of the norm is unconstitutional; (3) based on the granted verdict either partially or completely; (4) does not substantially different from the conditionally constitutional clause.

Pemetaan Pola Permohonan dan Putusan dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang dengan Substansi Hukum Islam Dian Agung Wicaksono; Faiz Rahman; Khotibul Umam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 18, No 3 (2021)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The existence of Islamic law substance in national law, specifically in an Act, has been indirectly placed the Constitutional Court in the position that also has a role in determining the development of Islamic law in the national law system. It can be seen in the context of judicial review of Act that has Islamic law substance or that explicitly regulates Islamic law. This research specifically answers: (a) how is the justification of the inclusion of Islamic law in Indonesian national law? (b) how are the pattern of judicial review petitions and court decisions of Acts related to Islamic law? This research is normative-juridical research, which analyses secondary data such as laws and regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, and articles related to the inclusion of Islamic law in the national law. The results show that the justification of the accommodation of Islamic law in the national law system is related to the construction of state and religion relationship. It indicates that Indonesia is not a religious state, but it is a state that has a divine principle. Furthermore, based on the analysis of judicial review decisions from 2003 to 2019, the pattern of petitions and court decisions of judicial reviews of laws related to Islamic law substance shows at least three main petitions, namely: (a) questioning state intervention in the implementation of Islamic law; (b) questioning the administration of the implementation of Islamic law; (c) petitions for the inclusion of Islamic law in the positive law.

Researching References on Interpretation of Personal Data in the Indonesian Constitution Faiz Rahman; Dian Agung Wicaksono
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 21, No 2 (2021): June Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

The discourse on personal data protection has been developed for a long time, even before the advent of internet technology. In the Indonesian context, issues relating to the personal data protection have begun to develop in recent years, responding to the increasingly rapid development of digital technology. Currently the Personal Data Protection Bill is again included in the 2021 Priority National Legislation Program in response to the importance of regulations relating to personal data protection in Indonesia. The fundamental thing that often escapes the discourse on the personal data protection in Indonesia is related to how personal data is positioned in a constitutional perspective based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia if personal data is considered as something that must be protected. This research specifically answered the questions: (a) how is the conceptual interpretation of personal data? (b) how is personal data positioned in the perspective of the Indonesian constitution? This research is a normative juridical research, conducted by analyzing secondary data obtained through literature review. The results of this research indicated that the conceptual interpretation of personal data is still a growing discourse. As for personal data in the perspective of the Indonesian constitution, it can be seen by looking at the legal-historical aspect in the discussion of the amendments to the 1945 Constitution, especially in Article 28G paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which is hypothesized as a reference for personal data protection.

Penafsiran terhadap Kewenangan Mengatur Pemerintahan Daerah dalam Melaksanakan Urusan Pemerintahan melalui Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah (Interpretation of the Regional Government’s Authority to Regulate in Implementing Government Affairs through the ... ) Dian Agung Wicaksono; Faiz Rahman
Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 11, No 2 (2020): JNH Vol 11 No 2 November 2020
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v11i2.1614

The Elucidation of the 2014 Local Government Law has divided the concurrent government affairs between the central government and local governments in detail. To carry out government affairs, local governments have the authority to stipulate regional regulation. The existence of that specific list of concurrent affairs, therefore, raises a question regarding what extent the local government can “elaborates” the government affairs that become their domain in the formulation of regional regulation. This research focuses on two questions: (1) regarding constitutional construction of local government’s authority to regulate; and (2) interpretation of the implementation of the authority to regulate in the formulation of regional regulation. This normative legal research is descriptive, evaluative, and prescriptive in nature. The results indicate alternative interpretations of the authority to regulate, namely implementation in (1) a legalistic-formal approach, through the rigid implementation of the authority and NSPK set by the Government; (2) a normative-extensive approach, by implementing the authority and NSPK, as well as paying attention to the Region’s needs; and (3) a supra-extensive approach, in which the Region goes beyond the corridors of their authority and the NSPK. For this reason, the author suggests that in the formulation of the NSPK, the accuracy of the Central Government is needed, so that can serve as a guideline for implementing flexible government affairs and can accommodate the legal needs of the community in the regions. abstrakLampiran UU Pemda 2014 telah membagi secara detail urusan pemerintahan konkuren antara pemerintah pusat dengan pemerintahan daerah. Untuk melaksanakan urusan pemerintahan konkuren tersebut, pemerintahan daerah memiliki kewenangan untuk menetapkan peraturan daerah. Kehadiran daftar urusan pemerintahan yang spesifik menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai sejauh mana pemerintahan daerah dapat “menjabarkan” urusan pemerintahan yang menjadi domain kewenangannya dalam pembentukan peraturan daerah. Penelitian ini berfokus pada dua permasalahan, yaitu: (1) konstruksi konstitusional kewenangan mengatur pemerintahan daerah; dan (2) penafsiran terhadap kewenangan mengatur urusan pemerintahan oleh pemerintahan daerah dalam pembentukan peraturan daerah. Penelitian hukum normatif ini dilakukan dengan mengkaji data sekunder, dengan sifat penelitian deskriptif, serta berbentuk evaluatif dan preskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya alternatif penafsiran terhadap kewenangan mengatur urusan pemerintahan dalam pembentukan peraturan daerah, yaitu: (1) pelaksanaan kewenangan mengatur secara legalistik-formal, mendasarkan kewenangan dan NSPK yang ditetapkan Pemerintah secara kaku; (2) pelaksanaan kewenangan mengatur secara normatif-ekstensif, yaitu selain mendasarkan pada kewenangan dan NSPK, Daerah juga memperhatikan kebutuhan hukum di Daerah; dan (3) pelaksanaan kewenangan mengatur secara supra-ekstensif, dimana Daerah mengatur melebihi koridor kewenangan dan NSPK. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini, disarankan dalam perumusan NSPK diperlukan kecermatan Pemerintah Pusat, sehingga dapat menjadi pedoman pelaksanaan urusan pemerintahan yang luwes dan dapat mengakomodasi kebutuhan hukum masyarakat di daerah.

Penerapan Klausul Bersyarat dalam Putusan Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Faiz Rahman
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 became the first formal review decision granting the submission and using a conditionally unconstitutional model. Slightly different from material review, in a formal review, what is declared unconstitutional is the procedure. Consequently, it affects the differences in applying conditionally clauses in a formal review. This research explores the conditionally clauses model used in formal review and its implication. Furthermore, this research illustrates those three clauses are likely always accompanied the conditionally unconstitutional ruling, namely: order to lawmakers to revise the law-making process in a specific period; statement regarding the transitional period of the enforcement of the Law; and statement that the Law will become permanently unconstitutional if no changes are made. Nevertheless, considering the design of formal review in the Constitutional Court Law and implications of conditionally decision in formal review, the appropriateness of conditionally decision model for formal constitutional review need to be reconsidered.

PERKEMBANGAN TEORI DAN PRAKTIK MENGENAI PARLEMEN DI INDONESIA Andy Omara; Joko Setiono; Muhammad Ibrahim; Faiz Rahman
Mimbar Hukum Vol 33 No 1 (2021): Mimbar Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Abstract The idea of a parliament system continues to develop from time to time. There are many thoughts of constitutional law experts which later became the theoretical basis for the implementation of the parliament system in a country, including in Indonesia. Furthermore, the existence of representative institutions such as the MPR, DPR, and DPD based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, also become an academic discourse concerning what kind of parliament system used in Indonesian parliament. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the existing theories on the parliament system and how it implemented, especially in Indonesia. Based on the background above, this research aims to find out and understand the theories and experts thought on parliament, as well as to find out and understand the implementation of parliament system in Indonesia, viewed from the historical-judicial approach. Conceptually, the theories concerning parliament can be traced since the time of Ancient Greece. Moreover, several theories regarding parliament developed, such as accommodation of group interests in the parliament, and theory on division of parliament chambers. Regarding the implementation of parliament system in Indonesia, historically and judicially, it has its own dynamics, especially in the context of accommodation of group interests and the practice of parliament chambers’ division. For instance, in the early independence period and after the stipulation of 1959 Presidential Decree, the system reflected was unicameral, while during the 1949 Constitution of RIS period was bicameral system. Furthermore, after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia, there is also a discourse concerning the form of parliament division that applied, whether it was unicameral, bicameral, or tricameral. Intisari Ide mengenai Parlemen, cabang pemerintahan yang berkuasa membuat dan mengubah undang-undang, telah menjadi topik perdebatan bagi para sarjana sejak zaman dulu kala. Artikel ini bermaksud untuk menceritakan secara singkat tentang perkembangan konsep lembaga legislatif dan menjelaskan dinamikaperkembangan sistem parlemen di Indonesia dalam hukum konstitusi dari sudut pandang historis. Artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa Parlemen adalah institusi yang terus berkembang, dengan sistem bikameralisme yang tampaknya lebih cocok dengan sistem demokrasi perwakilan. Meskipun telah mempraktikkan sistem parlemen yang berbeda-beda dalam sejarahnya, sejak masa reformasi Indonesia lebih cenderung menganut sistem bikameralisme lunak.

Influencing or Intervention? Impact of Constitutional Court Decisions on the Supreme Court in Indonesia Dian Agung Wicaksono; Faiz Rahman
Constitutional Review Vol 8, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/consrev823

The third amendment of Indonesia’s 1945 Constitution, conducted in 2001, had significant implications for the nation’s judiciary. It transformed the judiciary from a single to a dual structure. Consequently, there are two apexes of the judiciary: the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. Furthermore, the establishment of the Constitutional Court divided judicial review authority between the two apex courts. The Constitutional Court can review laws against the Constitution, while the Supreme Court has the power to review whether regulations, made under laws, contradict such laws. Although the Indonesian Constitution provides explicit delineations over the absolute competence of judicial review, the division of judicial review has often triggered tension between the two courts. The Constitution allows the Supreme Court to have additional authorities granted by laws. On the other hand, the Constitutional Court has the power to review any law against the Constitution, including laws related to the Supreme Court. This article seeks to answer the important question of whether the Constitutional Court could influence or intervene in the Supreme Court through judicial review. The authors argue that the duality of judicial review authority unintentionally causes an imbalance in the functional relationship between the two apexes of the judiciary. The main reason is that the Constitutional Court can influence or intervene in the Supreme Court through constitutional review authority. The authors examine two essential aspects of this: (1) the functional implications of duality of judicial review authority; and (2) the implementation of the Constitutional Court’s authority in reviewing laws, especially those closely related to the Supreme Court’s authorities. Various cases are examined to illustrate how the Constitutional Court could directly or indirectly influence the Supreme Courts’ authorities. The Constitutional Court, however, often seems to ‘play safe’ to maintain the judiciary’s imbalanced relationship caused by the dualism of judicial review authority.

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 8 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search