Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERANGKAT DESA YANG IKUT SERTA DALAM KAMPANYE PEMILU DI KABUPATEN INDRAGIRI HILIR Fitri wahyuni; Aris Irawan
Selodang Mayang: Jurnal Ilmiah Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir Vol 7 No 3 (2021): JURNAL SELODANG MAYANG
Publisher : Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47521/selodangmayang.v7i3.224

Abstract

The general election or regional head election (hereinafter referred to as the Regional Head Election) in a country is an effort to realize good governance and the realization of a democratic state. However, it raises legal problems in the field, such as the occurrence of the attitudes of state officials or state apparatus in this case, one of which is village officials who participate in efforts to win one of the candidates for election and post-conflict local election. This needs to be investigated through legal studies using normative legal research methods, with legal research sources namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials and the analysis used in this study using qualitative analysis. The Village Head is one part of the Government Bureaucracy which has been clearly regulated in the Election Law. All government bureaucracies may not be involved or support one candidate, including one of them is the Village Head, but in practice there are still many Village Heads who support certain candidates. In article 66 clause 2 part C about The General Election Commission Regulation Number 7 of 2015 was emphasized in the campaign, candidate pairs and/or campaign teams are prohibited from involving “village head or other designations/lurah and village apparatus or other designations/kelurahan.” The prohibition to include village heads and village apparatus is contained in Article 280 paragraph (2) of the Election Law. It is clear that if the campaign involves the village apparatus, it is included in the election violation and is included in an election crime and can be given a criminal sanction if it is proven to have committed an election crime. Pemilihan umum ataupun juga pemilihan kepala daerah (yang selanjutnya disebut dengan Pemilukada) dalam suatu negara merupakan upaya untuk mewujudkan pemerintahan yang baik serta terwujudnya negara demokrasi. Namun menimbulkan persoalan-persoalah hukum di lapangan seperti terjadinya sikap-sikap aparat negara atau perangkat-perangkat negara dalam hal ini salah satunya adalah perangkat desa yang ikut serta dalam upaya memenangkan salah satu calon peserta pemilu maupun pemilukada. Hal ini perlu diteliti melalui kajian hukum dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan sumber penelitian hukum yakni bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder serta analisa yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dengan menggunakan analisis kualitatif. Kepala Desa merupakan salah satu bagian dari Birokrasi Pemerintah yang telah diatur secara jelas di dalam Undang-Undang Pemilu. Semua birokrasi pemerintahan tidak boleh terlibat ataupun mendukung salah satu calon termasuk salah satunya adalah Kepala Desa namun dalam pelaksanaannya masih banyak seorang Kepala Desa menjadi pendukung bagi calon tertentu. Pada pasal 66 ayat 2 bagian C Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 7 tahun 2015 ditegaskan dalam kampanye, pasangan calon dan/atau tim kampanye dilarang melibatkan “kepala desa atau sebutan lain/lurah dan perangkat desa atau sebutan lain/kelurahan ”Larangan mengikut sertakan kepala desa dan perangkat desa terdapat dalam Pasal 280 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Pemilu. Jelas bahwa apabila dalam kampanye melibatkan dan perangkat desa termasuk dalam pelanggaran pemilu dan masuk dalam tindak pidana pemilu dan dapat diberi sanksi berupa pidana apabila terbukti melakukan tindak pidana pemilu.
The Legal Protection For Children Of Sexual Violence Victims In Indragirii Hilir Regency Fitri Wahyuni; Aris Irawan; Siti Rahmah
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): April 2021
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v2i2.46

Abstract

Currently, the phenomenon of children sexual abuse is a crime that is very distressing to society. It shows that children sexual abuse is an iceberg phenomenon that must be prevented so that children are no longer victims of sexual harassment by the responsible party. This research used normative legal as research methods. The data sources in the form of secondary data including primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Meanwhile, the data analysis used is in the form of qualitative analysis and deductive conclusion. From the results of this research, it was concluded that the protection efforts had been made through the regulation of laws and penal efforts both in the Criminal Code and the children protecting laws by providing criminal sanctions for sexual offenders. However, these efforts were not sufficient and they must be carried out through non-penal efforts by providing sex education from an early age and teaching religious values. 
KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DARI PERSPEKTIF PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP SAKSI PELAPOR DAN SAKSI PELAKU Aris Irawan
JURNAL HUKUM DAS SOLLEN Vol 4 No 1 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Das Sollen
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Korupsi merupakan gejala masyarakat yang dapat dijumpai dimana-mana. Korupsi telah menjadi extra ordinary crimes yang membahayakan perekonomian negara Indonesia dan menghambat pembangunan Nasional. Semua elemen tidak mengharapkan korupsi menjadi suatu akar masalah yang tidak terselesaikan dari dahulu sampai sekarang. Selama ini kebijakan hukum pidana dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi lebih mengarah terhadap pelaku semata, kebijakan hukum pidana tentang perlindungan saksi di Indonesia khusus dalam hal pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi adalah sebuah gagasan yang perlu di optimalkan, karena mengoptimalkan perlindungan saksi pelapor tindak pidana korupsi dapat dijadikan sebagai instrument alternatif dalam upaya pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Penegak hukum kesulitan untuk mengungkap sebuah kasus korupsi yang biasanya sangat terencana secara sistemik. Biasanya saksi dan/atau pelapor enggan untuk melaporkan sebuah kasus korupsi, karena adanya ancaman, intimidasi dan kriminalisasi terhadap terhadap dirinya dari pihak-pihak tertentu. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah (1) Bagaimanakah pengaturan perundang-undangan tentang perlindungan saksi dan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. (2) Bagaimanakah urgensi perlindungan saksi dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. (3) Bagaimanakah Kebijakan Hukum Pidana terhadap perlindungan Saksi sebagai sarana dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode Yuridis Normatif. Tipe penelitiannya adalah deskriptif. Sumber data adalah data primer didukung data sekunder. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat penulis simpulkan Pertama, Perkembangan Pengaturan tentang perlindungan saksi dalam kasus korupsi tidak terlepas dari kedudukan saksi dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Kedua, urgensi perlindungan saksi dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia, berkaitan dengan praktik intimidasi dan ancaman kepada saksi merupakan pengalaman empirik yang sering dialami. Berbagai laporan kasus dirilis oleh beberapa pihak telah menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan saksi dan korban adalah persoalan yang sangat penting dan urgen. Ketiga, kebijakan hukum pidana dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi lebih mengarah terhadap pelaku tindak pidana, sangat kurang terhadap saksi pelapor yang ikut berperan dalam mengungkap tindak pidana. Perlunya Optimalisasi peranan LPSK di dalam suatu kebijakan hukum pidana termasuk dalam memberikan perlindungan bagi saksi pelapor dalam tindak pidana korupsi, sehingga perlu pembaharuan Undang-Undang menyangkut perlindungan saksi dalam tindak pidana korupsi.
CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR PERFORMERS OF THE PERSECUTION OF RELIGIOUS FIGURES IN INDONESIA Fitri Wahyuni; Aris Irawan; Siti Rahmah
JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) Vol 7, No 1 (2021): JCH (JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM)
Publisher : STIH Putri Maharaja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33760/jch.v7i1.358

Abstract

Persecution is a crime that is against the law in which the perpetrator must be sanctioned in accordance with the actions he committed. Refers to recent phenomenon, Persecution is happening againt religious leaders in Indonesia today. This is in the public spotlight because the perpetrators of persecution of religious figures according to the assumption of the perpetrators are mentally ill. In this study, the researcher used normative legal research methods. The type of data used in this research is secondary data and tertiary data. After the data is collected, then the data is analyzed and compiled using descriptive analysis and deductively deduced from general things to specific things. The results of the study state that perpetrators of persecution of religious figures can be held by legal liability for the crime and must comply with the elements contained in the Criminal Code. Criminal liability for perpetrators of persecution of religious figures depends on the results of examinations that have been carried out by a psychiatrist, then the judge will judge whether the psychological condition experienced by the perpetrator has influenced his actions or not.
Evidence In Sexual Violence Crime Cases Gde Made Pasek Swardhyana; Aris Irawan
International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC) Vol. 3 No. 5 (2022): October 2022
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v3i5.491

Abstract

The focus of this research is related to the emergency phenomenon of sexual violence in Indonesia which is currently the world's concern. Evidence of criminal acts of sexual violence is often not revealed because it is constrained by the narrow evidence in the regulations for combating sexual violence crimes in Indonesia. The presence of Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning the Crime of Sexual Violence has become a breath of fresh air in the disclosure of cases of sexual violence in Indonesia, which is among the highest in Southeast Asia. To answer the objectives of this research, the type of research used is normative legal research with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach and a comparative approach, especially examining legal provisions related to evidence in sexual violence crimes in Indonesia. In the perspective of the ratio decidendi in criminal justice, it is related to the importance of evidence in overcoming this sexual violence crime in Indonesia. From the results of the study, it was found that there were several additional evidences in the Non-Criminal Act on Sexual Violence as a new regulation in dealing with sexual violence in Indonesia, including the recognition of victim statements, statements by psychologists and/or psychiatrists, electronic evidence, this is progress in the process. justice for sexual violence crimes in Indonesia by also including some additional new evidence, including psychiatrists' statements which are very helpful in disclosing cases of criminal acts of sexual violence in Indonesia which are increasingly showing alarming numbers. Entering silent evidence or evidence as a tool The evidence in the regulation of this new law provides another perspective in overcoming the crime of sexual violence in Indonesia which is difficult to uncover due to cultural factors and negative stigma towards victims of sexual violence.
The Dispute Resolution of Violation of Indonesian Forest Area Based on the Decision of The Supreme Court Number 269 K / TUN / 2018 Aris Irawan
Journal of Social Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Journal of Social Science
Publisher : Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (189.791 KB) | DOI: 10.46799/jss.v2i2.73

Abstract

This research aimed at analyzing the characteristics of resolution of forest area disputes based on the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 269K / TUN / 2018. This research used normative legal method with legal, case, and conceptual approaches. The results showed that the Decidendi Ratio of the Supreme Court’s Decision was inappropriate. It is because in the context of the principle of legal certainty, that the object of the dispute is not included in the PTUN Decree, because of the Decree of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning / Head of the National Land Agency Number 1 / Pbt / KEM-ATR / BPN / 2016, is an integral part of the execution of criminal law against the act of falsifying documents carried out by officials within the North Kalimantan National Land Agency (formerly East Kalimantan), in issuing the PT Nunukan Jaya Lestari HGU certificate. The Supreme Court’s consideration regarding the overlapping area between PT Adindo Hutani Lestari and PT Nunukan Jaya Lestari, covering ±3,500 Ha is also incorrect because it must be understood that the area claimed to be overlapping is a dispute of the forest area.