Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan
Max Boli Sabon
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Paradigma Hukum: Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu Rene Descartes, Auguste Comte, Thomas S Kuhn Max Boli Sabon
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (394.398 KB)

Abstract

Rene Descates, August Comte and Thomas Kuhn are the three pioneers of philosophy science during their carreers. Rene Descartes is known as “the father of the modern philosophy” regarding his “cogito ergo sum” theory, which successfully attracted huge attention in cosmic and teology world.. Auguste Comte and his “law of three stages” theory that once shaked the philosophy world during the positivism period. His theory and thoughts have been great inspiration until recently. However, his theory about the truth was neglected by Thomas Kuhn with his new theory which is known as “the structure of scientific revolution”. Thomas Kuhn saidd :”Those scientists despite their knowledge could not solve the meaning of the truth, but only solving the puzzle pieces”. This theory surely lead to reactions from many parties. According to those scientists, the development in philosophy science is a development in every fields, whereas including law science.  Through the library studies method and analogy method, we could find out that eventhough those scientists came from different eras, and produced different theories and opinions, the result of it is in fact they have similar views: “ Science is not just limited to science only, but also includes law science dedicated to humans and the communities in their daily life. This true fact about law science is the real paradigm that still is debatable”.
ASPEK EPISTEMOLOGI FILSAFAT HUKUM INDONESIA Max Boli Sabon
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jilid 41, Nomor 3, Tahun 2012
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3176.851 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.41.3.2012.423-431

Abstract

Abstract Many people say that the implementation of law in Indonesia has been on the track, nonetheless, it is only the way of putting into effect that is not wise enough. From  the point of view of the aspect of onthology of philosophy, the application of law in Indonesia is having no problem so far. On the other hand, the problem is in its epistemology. The duty of philosophy of law is to give explanation of such phenomenon. The problem is therefore laid down in epistemology, it is wise to use the school that talks a lot about epistemology of law. Furthermore, Indonesia is a pluralistic society, for that reason, the choice to use the Modern Natural Law as its approach is considered to be as one of the alternative, for the school itself is emphasizing upon the epistemology of law as well as the custom law which as the characteristic of pluralism of Indonesia. The study of epistemology of philosophy of law  in Indonesia, with the approach through the Modern Natural Law toward custom law of Indonesia is supported by the legal studies progressively that may explain the phenomenon of the confused and depraved enforcement of law in Indonesia. Keywords: epistemology of law, philosophy of law, modern natural law, custom law, legal studies progressively Abstrak Banyak orang mengatakan pengaturan hukum di Indonesia sudah baik; hanya cara pelaksanaannya yang tidak baik. Gejala ini berarti dari aspek ontologi filsafat hukum, hukum di Indonesia tidak bermasalah. Yang bermasalah adalah aspek epistemologinya. Filsafat hukum bertugas menjelaskan gejala ini. Oleh karena permasalahnnya terletak di bidang epistemologi, maka digunakan mazhab hukum yang banyak membicarakan tentang epistemologi hukum. Selain itu, Indonesia adalah bangsa yang majemuk. Untuk itu pilihannya antara lain adalah Mazhab Hukum Alam Modern karena banyak berbicara tentang epistemologi hukum sekaligus hukum adat sebagai ciri kemajemukan Indonesia. Studi epistemologi filsafat hukum Indonesia dengan pendekatan Mazhab Hukum Alam Modern terhadap hukum adat Indonesia yang didukung oleh pemikiran hukum secara progersif, dapat menjelaskan gejala carut-marutnya cara pelaksanaan hukum di Indonesia .   Kata Kunci: epistemologi hukum, filsafat hukum, hukum alam modern, hukum adat, pemikiran hukum progresif
TEORI HUKUM PROGRESIF : PENGENDALI DUNIA YANG LEPAS KENDALI Max Boli Sabon
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jilid 42, Nomor 4, Tahun 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2964.354 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.42.4.2013.503-510

Abstract

Anthony Giddens once wrote that the impact of globalization causes the world run away. The world runs away hurriedly, ramblingly, uncertainly, finally arrives in Indonesia in the form of corruption, as a super extra ordinary crime. It is hard to find the entry point of the movement in order to control it. The question is, if it is possible to control the world in this event? By using the approach of the theory of progressive law, including its vision and methods, it is indeed possible to try. The result of study arrives at a conclusion that corruption is now reaching a level where it can be described as running beyond control, and it may be controllable starting from the prime stage by means of the vision of progressive law, at the optimum stage, by means of the methods of progressive law, and finally at the ultima stage with the strength of the double mix of mind and heart.
Co-Authors