This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kesehatan
Farid Husin
Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perbandingan Kepadatan Mineral Tulang Antar Pemakai Kontrasepsi Hormonal Progestin dan Kontrasepsi Non Hormonal pada Wanita Usia Subur Aprilina Aprilina; Wiryawan Permadi; Elsa Pudji Setyawati; Farid Husin; Johanes C. Mose; Yudi Mulyana Hidayat
Jurnal Kesehatan Vol 11, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Kesehatan
Publisher : Politeknik Kesehatan Tanjung Karang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (862.08 KB) | DOI: 10.26630/jk.v11i1.1680

Abstract

The decrease of bone mineral density will result in reducing bone strength tend to bone brittle so osteoporosis occurred. Osteoporosis affects 44 million people in the United States, 80% are women. It was assumed that progestin contraceptive acceptors decreased bone mineral density and increased the risk of osteoporotic fractures. The study used a comparative analytical method by using a cross-sectional study. The population was all acceptors progestin hormonal contraceptives (implants or injections) and acceptors of non-hormonal contraception (IUD or MOW) who came to the Public health center of Sekip Palembang and public health center of Basuki Rahmat in Palembang. The total sample was 200 respondents. The sample used purposive sampling, by using a consecutive sampling technique. The results were analyzed by using the Mann Whitney test and two ways ANOVA test directions with post hoc test and profile analysis. The results showed a significant difference in bone mineral density between the acceptors of progestin hormonal contraceptives and the acceptors of non- hormonal contraceptives to eligible women with ρ-value=0.001. There was a significant difference between acceptor of progestin hormonal contraceptives and non- hormonal contraceptives to eligible women referred to the duration of use, p-value of 1-2 years old was p-value=0.109, >2-3 years, p-value 0.039, and ≥3 years, p-value=0.033. Conclusion: there are differences in bone mineral density between acceptors of progestin hormonal contraceptives and acceptors of non-hormonal contraceptives to eligible women.
Penerapan Aplikasi Sahabat Ibu Hamil (ASIH) terhadap Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Antenatal di Pedesaan Farhati Farhati; Nanan Sekarwana; Farid Husin
Jurnal Kesehatan Vol 9, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Kesehatan
Publisher : Politeknik Kesehatan Tanjung Karang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (716.629 KB) | DOI: 10.26630/jk.v9i3.965

Abstract

Quality of antenatal care is important to reduce the maternal mortality rate. It associated with providing antenatal care according to standards and meet the expectations or satisfaction of pregnant women. However, today’s midwifery practise still show low compliance with standards, especially related to health education and pregnant women empowerment through the use of Maternal and Child Health media books. This research aimed to analyze the effect of “Aplikasi Sahabat Ibu Hamil” implementation to antenatal care quality improvement in rural areas. This study using quasi-experimental pre-post test design with control groups conducted in West Bandung regency with sample of 61 midwive and pregnant women, using checklists and questionnaires. Univariable analysis was done through Rash modeling, bivariable analysis using numeric categorical comparative test. The results indicated that the quality of antenatal services between control and treatment groups showed significant difference with p<0,01. Aplikasi Sahabat Ibu Hamil (ASIH) implementation served to increase midwive adherence to antenatal care standards by 47.2% and satisfaction of pregnant women by 43.8%. The proportion of good quality antenatal care were 84% in treatment groups and 37% in control group. Antenatal care without using ASIH will increase midwives’ risk of noncompliance in antenatal care standards 3.93 times, pregnant women dissatisfaction 4.4 times and poor quality of antenatal care 3.93 times compared with antenatal care using ASIH.