Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal (Birle Journal)
Kms. M. Amin Fauzi
Lecturer in State University of Medan
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Development of Students Work Sheet Based on Realistic Mathematic Approach with Ethnomatematic nuanced to Improve Critical Thinking of 4th Grade Students in Primary School (SD NEGERI 091358 Haranggaol, Haranggaol Horisan Sub-District) Ester Emerita Tarigan; Hasratuddin Hasratuddin; Kms. M. Amin Fauzi
Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education, Februa
Publisher : BIRCU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birle.v3i1.765

Abstract

This study aims to develop students' worksheets based on a realistic mathematical approach with Ethnomatematic named on rounding numbers in 4th grade of primary school (SD Negeri 091358 Haranggaol, Haranggaol Horisan Sub-District). The object of this research is the Student Worksheet based on Realistic Mathematics Approach in Ethnomatematic nuance. The instrument used in this study was the mathematics learning achievement test and student response questionnaire. Data were collected and analyzed with quantitative descriptive analysis techniques. This research method is Borg & Gall development research combined with Dick & Carey's learning development model. The test subjects consisted of material and design learning experts, two linguists, using trial I and trial II. The results showed (1) The results of the expert test of subject matter on the assessment of the appropriateness of the content and the feasibility of the presentation were in very good criteria (85.42%); (2) The results of the learning design expert test were in very good criteria (94.23%); (3) Linguists' test results are in very good criteria (94.44%); (4) The results of trial I are in good criteria (60%); (5) The results of trial II are in very good criteria (90%).
Co-Authors Ester Emerita Tarigan Hasratuddin Hasratuddin