Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Penelitian Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada
Faiz Rahman
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PERKAWINAN SIRI ONLINE DITINJAU DARI PRESPEKTIF HUKUM PERKAWINAN ISLAM YANG BERLAKU DI INDONESIA Faiz Rahman; Rizka Nur Faiza
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 1, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (364.067 KB)

Abstract

AbstractThis research aims to find out and understand the practices of sirri marriage in Indonesia reviewed from  fiqh munakahat and Indonesian marriage law, find out and understand the practices of online sirri marriage reviewed from fiqh munakahat and Indonesian marriage law, and what is the juridical consequenses of this online sirri marriage reviewed from fiqh munakahat and Indonesian marriage law. This research use case study method, which is use primary and secondary sources of law. The research shows that currently there has been no clear definition of sirri marriage in the provisions of the legislation. Both conventional and online sirri marriage actually contrary to fiqh munakahat and Indonesian marriage law. One of the juridical consequenses of this online sirri marriage is that marriage is not legally recognized and there is no legal protection to the perpetrators of online sirri marriage IntisariPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memahami bagaimana praktik perkawinan siri ditinjau dari fiqih munakahat dan hukum perkawinan yang berlaku di Indonesia, bagaimana praktik perkawinan siri secara online ditinjau dari fiqih munakahat dan hukum perkawinan yang berlaku di Indonesia, serta bagaimana konsekuensi yuridis dari dilakukannya perkawinan siri secara online ditinjau dari fiqih munakahat dan hukum perkawinan yang berlaku di Indonesia. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode studi pustaka. Jenis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa saat ini belum terdapat definisi yang jelas mengenai perkawinan siri dalam ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Perkawinan siri baik secara konvensional maupun secara online sejatinya bertentangan dengan fiqih munakahat maupun hukum perkawinan yang berlaku di Indonesia. Salah satu konsekuensi yuridis dari perkawinan siri secara online adalah perkawinan tersebut dianggap tidak ada dan tidak pernah terjadi menurut hukum sehingga tidak ada perlindungan hukum bagi kedua pelaku perkawinan siri secara online.
Why Did the Adoption of Constitutional Deferral Lead to Unintended Consequences of Freedom of Association in Indonesia? Andy Omara; Kristina Viri; Faiz Rahman
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss1.2148.pp60-78

Abstract

A constitutional deferral is an approach utilised by constitutional drafters so that the drafters do not regulate things in detail in the constitution. This approach is believed to provide more opportunity for the constitutional framers to achieve consensus in drafting a constitution. In the end, this helps a constitution last longer. Constitutional deferral also offers some flexibility for the legislative and the judiciary in interpreting the text of the constitution in the future, which may accommodate the original intentions of the constitutional drafters. This paper argues the opposite. In Indonesia, adopting constitutional deferral causes an uncertain future of freedom of association. This paper aims to address two central questions. First, why did the framers of the first constitution adopt constitutional deferral in drafting provisions on freedom of association? Second, what are the consequences of implementing constitutional deferral toward freedom of association in Indonesia? Through historical and doctrinal approaches, the paper concludes (1) that the sharp ideological differences among constitutional drafters when drafting provisions on freedom of association forced them to employ constitutional deferral. (2) The use of constitutional deferral opens more possibilities for inconsistent interpretation by the executive, the lawmakers, and the judiciary when they establish law or adjudicated cases related to freedom of association. Through constitutional deferral, these three branches of government limit freedom of association instead of protecting such freedom.
Why Did the Adoption of Constitutional Deferral Lead to Unintended Consequences of Freedom of Association in Indonesia? Andy Omara; Kristina Viri; Faiz Rahman
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss1.2148.pp60-78

Abstract

A constitutional deferral is an approach utilised by constitutional drafters so that the drafters do not regulate things in detail in the constitution. This approach is believed to provide more opportunity for the constitutional framers to achieve consensus in drafting a constitution. In the end, this helps a constitution last longer. Constitutional deferral also offers some flexibility for the legislative and the judiciary in interpreting the text of the constitution in the future, which may accommodate the original intentions of the constitutional drafters. This paper argues the opposite. In Indonesia, adopting constitutional deferral causes an uncertain future of freedom of association. This paper aims to address two central questions. First, why did the framers of the first constitution adopt constitutional deferral in drafting provisions on freedom of association? Second, what are the consequences of implementing constitutional deferral toward freedom of association in Indonesia? Through historical and doctrinal approaches, the paper concludes (1) that the sharp ideological differences among constitutional drafters when drafting provisions on freedom of association forced them to employ constitutional deferral. (2) The use of constitutional deferral opens more possibilities for inconsistent interpretation by the executive, the lawmakers, and the judiciary when they establish law or adjudicated cases related to freedom of association. Through constitutional deferral, these three branches of government limit freedom of association instead of protecting such freedom.
Co-Authors Andy Omara Kristina Viri Rizka Nur Faiza