Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion
Pondang Hasibuan
Universitas HKBP Nommensen
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
AKIBAT HUKUM PENCABUTAN BERITA ACARA PEMERIKSAAN SAKSI DI DEPAN PERSIDANGAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Nomor 201/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Simalungun) Pondang Hasibuan; Sahat Benny Risman Girsang; Erni Juniria Harefa; Janpatar Simamora; Herlina Manullang
Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion Vol 01 No 01 Juli 2020
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas HKBP Nommensen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51622/njlo.v1i01.341

Abstract

During the trial, witnesses were often found retracting the testimony of witnesses given during the investigation (Police) in court. There are many reasons that the revocation is given by the witness to revoke the witness's BAP that has been given before the investigator. The problem studied is how the consequences of the revocation of the BAP in front of the trial affect the judge's decision in Decision No. 201/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Simalungun. The research method uses a normative juridical approach, which is an approach based on the main legal material by examining theories, concepts, legal principles and legislation. In Decision No. 201/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Sim that the strength of the evidence of the witness's BAP becomes an integral part of the investigation file and is finally transferred to the District Court for trial, it has become evidence of affidavits. That the consequence of the revocation of the witness's BAP before the trial in Decision No. 201/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Sim did not affect the judge's decision to convict the defendant, because the Panel of Judges considered that the revocation of the witness's BAP did not have a strong reason and the defendant's actions were also categorized as extraordinary crime.
PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PROSES PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENGERUSAKAN DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PERATURAN JAKSA AGUNG TENTANG PENGHENTIAN PENUNTUTAN BERDASARKAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF (Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Pematangsiantar) Sahat Benny Risman Girsang; Erni Juniria Harefa; Pondang Hasibuan; July Esther
Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion Vol 02 No 01 Januari 2021
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas HKBP Nommensen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51622/njlo.v2i01.347

Abstract

Settlement of criminal cases through restorative justice in stage two (2) or since the handing over of responsibility for suspects and evidence to the Public Prosecutor has been regulated in the Attorney General's Regulation No. 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. The legality of the application of restorative in Indonesia has been used in Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System (SSPA) and the Circular Letter of the Chief of Police No. 8 of 2018 concerning the Application of Restorative Justice before the start of the investigation sent to the Public Prosecutor. a law enforcement in a slow direction because law enforcement is carried out at various levels from the Police, Attorney General's Office, District Courts, High Courts and even to the Supreme Court. In the end it has an impact on the accumulation of cases that are not small in number in court. The purpose of this study is to find out the application and problems that occur in the application of restorative justice through efforts to stop prosecution in the process of resolving cases of criminal acts of vandalism associated with the Attorney General's Regulation No. 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. This research is normative-empirical juridical using a case approach and a statutory approach. Data collection techniques using primary data are field interviews at the Pematang Siantar District Attorney and library research to obtain secondary data. Referring to the principle of fast, simple and low cost justice, PERJA No. 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice has been accommodated, especially in cases of destruction by making peace between victims and suspects, and the peace process is carried out voluntarily, with deliberation and consensus, without pressure, coercion and intimidation. In this peace process the facilitator is the Public Prosecutor, this is because there is no interest and connection with the case, against the victim and the suspect. In the implementation of PERJA No. 15 of 2020, it turns out that there are many obstacles, including the lack of understanding among law enforcement regarding restorative justice, lack of infrastructure, and public misunderstanding.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI (PT) ATAS TINDAK PIDANA PERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP Erni Juniria Harefa; Pondang Hasibuan; Sahat Benny Risman Girsang; Herlina Manullang
Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion Vol 02 No 02 Juli 2021
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas HKBP Nommensen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51622/njlo.v2i02.356

Abstract

The occurrence of environmental crimes in the form of environmental pollution and/or destruction, mostly carried out in the context of running an economic business, and is also the attitude of the authorities and entrepreneurs who do not carry out or neglect their obligations in environmental management. Environmental pollution and/or destruction continues to increase in line with the increase in industrial activities or the like, of course the environment needs legal protection. Article 116 of the Environmental Protection and Management Law (UUPPLH), makes the concept of corporate criminal responsibility and corporate management (directors, managerswho are responsible for managing the company's environment, can even be asked to shareholders and commissioners) together, in the event that the activities and/or business of the corporation cause environmental pollution and/or destruction. On the other hand, the accountability of the directors/management of the corporation is also needed because there is a possibility that the sanctions imposed on the corporation will not affect the lives of the leaders/management of the corporation.The method used in this thesis research is normative juridical research using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. This study uses library research techniques, which are then analyzed qualitatively. Based on the results of the study, that corporate criminal liability in Article 116 paragraph (1) UUPPLH is based on the identification of Theory and Vicarious Liability. Meanwhile, the director's criminal responsibility as an individual for criminal acts of environmental destruction occurs as long as the director has the authority to prevent violations or to improve the situation. Meanwhile, the criminal responsibility of the director representing the PT organ for environmental crimes can be identified based on the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine (RCO) and Strict Liability, because his position in the company has an obligation to take action to ensure that the violation will not occur as stipulated in Article 116 and 117 UUPPLH.
Co-Authors Erni Juniria Harefa Esther, July Herlina Manullang Janpatar Simamora Sahat Benny Risman Girsang