Insan Praditya Anugrah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Ersatz Capitalism in Indonesian Automotive Industry during The New Order Era, 1969—1998 Insan Praditya Anugrah
Lembaran Sejarah Vol 12, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (410.184 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/lembaran-sejarah.33465

Abstract

This paper examines a historical trajectory using Kunio Yoshihara’s concept of ersatz capitalism to analyze the development of Indonesian automotive Industry during New Order Era, 1969-1998. The concept analyzes the fact that the ersatz capitalism structure and ersatz capitalists behavior had caused the failure of Indonesian automotive Industry development to achieve self-reliance. Ersatz Capitalism is characterized by patronage between capitalists and bureaucrats, the capitalists reluctance to invest in research and technological development, foreign capital and foreign technology domination, and the domestic capitalists role that act only as a distributor of the manufactured high-technology products of foreign principals instead of doing research and development, in order to seek immediate high profit return with minimum investment. Through the research, this paper analyzes the role of the ersatz capitalists from the various background such as military, Chinese capitalists, and president families and relatives had supported foreign principal domination In Indonesia. Those capitalists are reluctant to support government programs toward self-reliance industry and choose to strengthen their ties with foreign principals, in order to get immediate profit return without much investment and technological research.
Othering The Minority: Comparative Study of Papua in Indonesia’s New Order Era and Rohingya in Myanmar during Military Junta Insan Praditya Anugrah
Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities
Publisher : RMPI-BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The paper examines the comparative study of subaltern between Papua in Indonesia’s New Order era and Rohingya in Myanmar during military rule. In Indonesia, Papuan case is an example of how the centralistic military regime treats Papuan ethnic as an object and treat them as “the others” rather than considers them as a part of “Indonesian entity” as the subject itself. Meanwhile in Myanmar, Rohingya case is an example of how centralistic military junta regime treats Rohingya ethnic as “the others” and considers them as foreigners in Myanmar. This paper found a significant difference between the treatment of Indonesian military regime towards Papuan ethnic and the treatment of Myanmar military junta regime towards Rohingya ethnic. In Indonesia, the military regime acknowledges Papuan as a citizen of Indonesia. However, the regime considers Papuan as the “different other” nonetheless. Their different race and ethnicity from Java and Malay ethnic as the majority ethnic are not the subject of the cause, yet it is caused by Papuan traditional behavior which is regarded as “backward” as by the central regime. Meanwhile in Myanmar, since the enforcement of citizenship law in 1982, the military regime clearly does not acknowledge Rohingya from the state citizenship because of their identities, such as religion and Rohingya historical background.