Angguntari C. Sari
Jurusan Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, Bandung

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Pembahasan Defence Cooperation Agreement Indonesia - Singapura oleh DPR dan Pemerintah Indonesia dan Implikasinya bagi Teori Birokratik Politik Sari, Angguntari C.; D, Mira Permatasari; Syawfi, Idil
Jurnal Ilmiah HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL Vol 9, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Jurnal Ilmiah HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3713.012 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This paper aims to examine the extent to which the internal discussion of the Defence andCooperation Agreement between Indonesia and Singapore consistent with the bureaucratic politicstheory. Using the null hypotesis and process tracing methods, this paper tests the bureaucratic politictheory, which was first introduced in the foreign policy studies by Graham Allison and PhilipZelikiow. Specifically, this paper asks the following questions: Who are the foreign policy makers inIndonesia with regards to the faith of DCA? What are their stances toward the future of DCA? Howdoes each decision makers advance their own opinion on this matter? What influence their stance?Does the final outcome reflect each actors initial preference over the outcome? Based on the paperscontent and other authors observation, this paper argues that the internal discussion regarding thefuture of DCA is not entirely consistent with the argument made by Allison and Zelikow inbureuacratic politics theory. .Keywords : bureaucratic politic, foreign policy, Indonesia foreign policy
Testing Theories of the Determinants of An Individual Foreign Policy Preferences in Georgia Sari, Angguntari C.
Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional Vol 13, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional
Publisher : Parahyangan Center for International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (513.56 KB) | DOI: 10.26593/jihi.v13i2.2542.91-103

Abstract

AbstractPublic opinion has an impact on states’ foreign policy. In the case of Georgia, the pro-Russian or pro-United States attitude among the people is determined by several factors. The strategic value of Georgia for these two most powerful states in the world makes their study of the mass opinion’s preferences toward major power an interesting and a valuable one. In this article, I test two sets of factors that shape the individual preferences toward major powers, and employ logistic regression model to explain the relationship between four independent variables with the dependent variable. I argue that religiosity, role of government, and economic satisfaction are still the best predictors of the pro-Russian policy. Key words: Georgia, public opinion, Russia, United States, logistic regressionAbstrakKebijakan luar negeri suatu negara dipengaruhi oleh pendapat para masyarakatnya. Pertanyaannya adalah apa yang mempengaruhi pandangan masyarakat mengenai kebijakan yang selayaknya diambil oleh pemerintah? Artikel ini meneliti faktor-faktor yang dapat mempengaruhi pandangan masyarakat di Georgia mengenai rekan ideal bagi negara mereka. Georgia sendiri merupakan negara yang memiliki nilai strategis bagi negara besar seperti Rusia dan Amerika. Oleh karenanya, kajian mengenai determinan opini publik mengenai siapa diantara kedua negara besar tersebut yang layak menjadi mitra Georgia penting untuk dilakukan. Melalui metode kuantitatif, khususnya pendekatan regresi logistik, artikel ini berusaha melanjutkan penelitian yang terdahulu. Penelitian sebelumnya melihat korelasi antara faktor agama, peran pemerintah, dan kepuasan ekonomi dengan pilihan masyarakat terhadap mitra kerjasama luar negeri Georgia. Satu hal yang luput dari penelitian sebelumnya adalah peran nilai politik. Berdasar analisa melalui model regresi logistik, faktor agama, peran pemerintah, dan kepuasan ekonomi masih menjadi faktor penentu utama pilihan masyarakat Georgia mengenai siapa diantara Amerika dan Rusia yang dianggap ideal menjadi mitra hubungan bilateral negara mereka. Kata kunci: georgia; opini publik; rusia; amerika; regresi logistik.
Pembahasan Defence Cooperation Agreement Indonesia - Singapura oleh DPR dan Pemerintah Indonesia dan Implikasinya bagi Teori Birokratik Politik Sari, Angguntari C.; D, Mira Permatasari; Syawfi, Idil
Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional Vol 9, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Parahyangan Center for International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3713.012 KB) | DOI: 10.26593/jihi.v9i2.1044.%p

Abstract

Abstract: This paper aims to examine the extent to which the internal discussion of the Defence andCooperation Agreement between Indonesia and Singapore consistent with the bureaucratic politicstheory. Using the null hypotesis and process tracing methods, this paper tests the bureaucratic politictheory, which was first introduced in the foreign policy studies by Graham Allison and PhilipZelikiow. Specifically, this paper asks the following questions: Who are the foreign policy makers inIndonesia with regards to the faith of DCA? What are their stances toward the future of DCA? Howdoes each decision makers advance their own opinion on this matter? What influence their stance?Does the final outcome reflect each actors initial preference over the outcome? Based on the paperscontent and other authors observation, this paper argues that the internal discussion regarding thefuture of DCA is not entirely consistent with the argument made by Allison and Zelikow inbureuacratic politics theory. .Keywords : bureaucratic politic, foreign policy, Indonesia foreign policy
Pembahasan Defence Cooperation Agreement Indonesia - Singapura oleh DPR dan Pemerintah Indonesia dan Implikasinya bagi Teori Birokratik Politik Angguntari C. Sari; Mira Permatasari D; Idil Syawfi
Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional Vol. 9 No. 2 (2013)
Publisher : Parahyangan Center for International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3713.012 KB) | DOI: 10.26593/jihi.v9i2.1044.%p

Abstract

Abstract: This paper aims to examine the extent to which the internal discussion of the Defence andCooperation Agreement between Indonesia and Singapore consistent with the bureaucratic politicstheory. Using the null hypotesis and process tracing methods, this paper tests the bureaucratic politictheory, which was first introduced in the foreign policy studies by Graham Allison and PhilipZelikiow. Specifically, this paper asks the following questions: Who are the foreign policy makers inIndonesia with regards to the faith of DCA? What are their stances toward the future of DCA? Howdoes each decision makers advance their own opinion on this matter? What influence their stance?Does the final outcome reflect each actor's initial preference over the outcome? Based on the paper'scontent and other authors' observation, this paper argues that the internal discussion regarding thefuture of DCA is not entirely consistent with the argument made by Allison and Zelikow inbureuacratic politics theory. .Keywords : bureaucratic politic, foreign policy, Indonesia foreign policy
Pembahasan Defence Cooperation Agreement Indonesia –Singapuraoleh DPR dan Pemerintah Indonesia dan Implikasinya bagi Teori Birokratik Politik Angguntari C. Sari; Mira Permatasari; Idil Syawfi
Research Report - Humanities and Social Science Vol. 2 (2013)
Publisher : Research Report - Humanities and Social Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (394.016 KB)

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the extent to which the internal dicsusion of the Defence and Cooperation Agreement between Indonesia and Singapore consistent with the bureaucratic politics theory. Using the null hypotesis and process tracing methods, this paper tests the bureaucratic politic theory, which was first introduced in the foreign policy studies by Graham Allison and Philip Zelikiow. Specifically, this paper asks the following questions: Who are the foreign policy makers in Indonesia with regards to the faith of DCA? What are their stances toward the future of DCA? How does each decision makers advance their own opinion on this matter? What influence their stance? Does the final outcome reflect each actor’s initial preference over the outcome? Based on the paper’s content and other authors’ observation, this paper argues that the internal discussion regarding the future of DCA is not entirely consistent with the argument made by Allison and Zelikow in bureuacratic politics theory. Key words: bureaucratic politic, foreign policy, Indonesia foreign policy