Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Yudi Widagdo
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO Yudi Widagdo
DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum Vol 1 No 1 (2015): Diversi Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS ISLAM KADIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (215.794 KB) | DOI: 10.32503/diversi.v1i1.127

Abstract

Plato and Aristotle are thinkers on the future of Greece that were raised in the Greek civilization. Aristotle is known as empirical-realist thinkers in contrast to Plato who think utopian and idealistic. Aristotle’s thought might be a form of protest against the thoughts and ideas of Plato. Aristotle was a pupil of Plato, while Plato was strongly influenced by Socrates thought either ideas, ideas and values delivered by Socrates, all written by Plato in the form of books, particularly his phenomenal work isup to now. Plato’s idea is relative not to have original valuesfor Plato simply continued the ideas presented by Socrates, possibly a writer dare say that Plato was not there but there was only the thought of Socrates, but it's relative. Plato has also developed the idea and values taught by Socrates, because Socrates never wrote his thoughts in a book, this is perhaps the weakness of Socrates
Evaluasi Kritis Pembentukan Komposisi Keanggotaan Komisi Dalam Kelembagaan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat: Kajian Reformasi Parlemen Berbasis Konstitusionalisme Dan Demokrasi Indra Bayu Nugroho; Yudi Widagdo
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 4 JULI 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The formation of the composition of the composition of the commission membership in the institution of the House of Representatives is confirmed the dominance of the Political Party Faction significantly, this causes the basis for the placement of members of the House of Representatives in commissions is often not based on competence but rather on pragmatic political calculations which are certainly not ideal for democracy. The research method applied in writing this paper is normative or doctrinal legal research that specifically examines the sources of legal materials, as well as non-legal materials that are relevant to the theme and framework of the research carried out. The purpose of this research itself is to obtain a more ideal and coherent concept with democracy and the principle of constitutionalism in terms of the mechanism for forming the composition of the composition of the field commission membership in the DPR institution. The result of this study is that the mechanism for determining the membership of the commission must be based on the will of the members of the House of Representatives in principle, where the members of the House of Representatives propose 4 (four) desired commission choices to the leadership of the House of Representatives accompanied by the rationality of the choice, as well as evidence of experience and competence that is coherent with the desired field, which then the leadership of the House of Representatives with the assistance of the Expert Body conducts an open selection to decide on the placement each member of the House of Representatives
Co-Authors Indra Bayu Nugroho