Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)
Hendra Musfa Dirman
Universitas Negeri Padang
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Education Materials Science & Nanotechnology Physics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Review and Comparison of Four-Tier Multiple Choice and Five-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Tests to Identify Mastery of Physics Concepts Hendra Musfa Dirman; Fatni Mufit; Festiyed Festiyed
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): January
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.838

Abstract

Misconceptions of a concept in a lesson will have an influence on understanding the next concept. Having misconceptions that exist in learning can understand the nature of the misconceptions and consequently can help student learning progress. Therefore, a diagnostic test for misconceptions is needed, including the newest four-tier multiple-choice and five-tier multiple-choice. This research is a literature review that provides an information system using the PRISMA method which often occurs in students' misconceptions in high school physics subjects. The data for this research are 60 selected articles from 2017-2021. The purpose of this study is to reveal the use of four-tier multiple-choice and five-tier multiple-choice diagnostic tests in physics and also provide a comparison of each instrument with the strengths and weaknesses of the four-tier multiple-choice and five-tier multiple-choice diagnostic tests. Furthermore, the use of multiple-choice four levels (83.33%) and multiple-choice five levels (16.67%). In the use of the four-tier multiple choice physical material diagnostic test, which is often used in identifying misconceptions, are optical devices (12%) and energy businesses (10%). And the use of an additional five-tier multiple-choice instrument diagnostic test that is often used is to present an overview or conclusion at the fifth level. However, each type of four-tier multiple-choice and five-tier multiple-choice test has its own advantages and disadvantages in assessing students' conceptions.
Disain dan Validitas E-Instrument Five Tier-Multiple Choice Test Menggunakan iSpring Quiz Maker Sebagai Asesmen Literasi Sains Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Abad-21 Hendra Musfa Dirman; Fatni Mufit
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 8 No 6 (2022): December
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2300

Abstract

The goal of 21st century learning is to provide students with conceptual knowledge and scientific literacy abilities. Creating a five-tier multiple choice e-instrument on the subject of work and energy and momentum and impulse. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and validity of a five-tier multiple choice e-instrument using the i-Spring Quiz Maker as an assessment of scientific literacy and understanding of concepts for high school students in class X. The research carried out included the type of development research using the Plomp model. The research was carried out to the expert review stage (Validity). The object of the research is a five-tier multiple choice e-instrument using the i-Spring Quiz Maker. The source of content validity data was obtained from the results of expert validation by a Physics lecturer at the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, UNP. Preliminary research conducted at this stage of research revealed that teachers were not familiar with the five-tier-multiple choice instrument in assessing students' conceptual understanding, especially on the matter of effort and energy and momentum and impulse. In the Development or Prototyping Phase, a five-level multiple choice electronic instrument is designed using the i-Spring Quiz Maker application. The results of the self-evaluation were obtained with very good criteria. The results of the instrument validity test are obtained as a whole with a high validity category.
Co-Authors Fatni Mufit Festiyed