Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME: ANTARA DESIDERATA DAN REALITA Rani Hendriana
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 16 No. 1 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v16i1.1273

Abstract

The existence of legal protection for victims of criminal acts of terrorism is the greatest desiderata for the victims, however, is not the case with the existing reality. Things are interesting to study, regarding legal protection for victims of criminal acts of terrorism in Indonesian positive criminal law and the factors inhibiting the provision of legal protection. The method used is normative. The results indicate that there are three legislations were oriented towards victims of criminal acts of terrorism, however, in reality does not match the expectations of victims where there are still weaknesses, both in the aspect of legal substance component, legal structure, and legal culture. In response, the strengthening of legal substance, structure and culture needs to be done. Keywords: Protection, victims of terrorism, reality, desiderata
Penguatan Kompetensi Penyusunan Legal Opinion Generasi Z di Era Transformasi Teknologi Rani Hendriana; Maya Ruhtiani
ARDHI : Jurnal Pengabdian Dalam Negri Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juni: ARDHI : Jurnal Pengabdian Dalam Negri
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Pendidikan Agama dan Filsafat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/ardhi.v4i3.2180

Abstract

Technological transformation has enabled Generation Z to access a wide range of digital legal resources more easily; however, such accessibility must be accompanied by critical thinking skills, source verification, and the ability to construct legal arguments systematically. This community service program aimed to strengthen law students’ competence in understanding and drafting legal opinions while fostering awareness of the critical and responsible use of technology in legal analysis. The program employed an educational-participatory approach through several stages, including needs identification, community organization, material preparation, presentation of legal opinion drafting techniques, interactive discussions, descriptive evaluation, and documentation. The results showed that the program strengthened participants’ understanding of the functions and systematic structure of a legal opinion, particularly in distinguishing facts, legal issues, legal grounds, analysis, conclusions, and recommendations. Interactive discussions also enhanced participants’ awareness that the use of digital legal resources and technology must be accompanied by verification, accuracy, ethical considerations, and professional responsibility. In addition, students’ involvement in organizing the program contributed to the development of participation, collaboration, and leadership within the academic community. This program provides a foundation for the development of more practical, adaptive, and sustainable legal education through case-based and technology-supported legal opinion drafting practices.