Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Suprapto Suprapto
Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Pascasarjana, FKIP – UNS
Education Mathematics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI), PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN PEMBELAJARAN KLASIKAL DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA Suprapto Suprapto; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari Saputro
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 2 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmme.v6i2.10062

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from student’s leraning activity. The learning models compared were TAI with scientific approach, PBL with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach.This experiment was quasi-experimental. It uses 3 x 3 factorial planning. The population was the entire 8th grade students of State Junior high School in Grobogan regency in the academic year 2014/2015. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The sample consisted of students of SMP N 2 Tegowanu, SMP N 3 Godong and SMP N 5 Purwodadi. Data collection instruments used were learning achievement test and student learning activity questionnaire. Hypothesis examination used was variance analysis (anava) with unequal cell.Conclusions acquired from this thesis are as follows: 1) PBL using scientific approach gives better mathematics learning achievement compared to TAI and classical Learning, TAI using scientific approach gives better mathematics learning achievement compared to classical learning. 2) student’s mathematics achievement with high learning activity is better than those with intermediate and poor learning activity, intermediate learning activity is better than those with poor learning activity. 3) on TAI using scientific approach, student’s mathematics achievement with high learning activity is as good as those with intermediate learning activity, high learning activity is better than those with poor learning activity, and intermediate learning activity is good as those with poor learning activity. Students which is given PBL using scientific approach, students with high learning activity have mathematics learning achievement as good as those with intermediate learning activity, high learning activity is better than those with poor learning activity, and intermediate learning activity is good as those with poor learning activity. 4) for students with high learning activity, PBL gives learning achievement as good as TAI, PBL gives learning achievement better than classical learning, and TAI gives learning achievement better than classical learning. For students with intermediate learning activity; TAI, PBL and classical learning gives the same good result. For students with poor learning activity; TAI, PBL and classical learning gives the same good result on student’s learning achievement. And student’s learning achievement on algebra which is given PBL is as good as those which is given classical learning.Keywords: TAI using scientific approach, PBL using scientific approach, classical learning, learning activity, learning achievement 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION, THINK-PAIR-SHARE, DAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI EKSPONEN DAN LOGARITMA DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI KABUPATEN PACITAN Suprapto Suprapto; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to know the influence of teaching and learning models with the scientific approach toward the students’ achievement in learning mathematics considered from the creativity of the students. Teaching and learning models to be compared were GI, TPS, and PBL. This research was chategorized as a quasi experimental research. The population was all students of grade X MIA public SMAs in Pacitan regency in the year 2014/2015. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The method of data collection were documentation, questionaire, and test. Hypothesis testing was performed using two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. The conclusions of this research were as follows. 1. The students’ achievement in mathematics given GI-S model was better than those who were given TPS-S model, while the students’ achievement given GI-S was the same as those who were given PBL-S model, and the students’ achievement given TPS-S model was the same as those who were given  PBL-S model;  2. The mathematics achievement of the students who had high level creativity was the same as those who had  medium level creativity, while those who had  high level creativity was better than those who had  low level creativity, and the students with medium level gave the same achievement as those with low level creativity; 3. In high level creativity, the students’ achievement in learning mathematics using GI-S model was the same as those using TPS-S and PBL-S models. In medium level creativity, the students using GI-S model gave the same achievement as those using TPS-S and PBL-S models, but the students’ achievement using  PBL-S model was better than using TPS-S model. In low level creativity, the students who learned mathematics using GI-S model gave the same achievement as those who used TPS-S and PBL-S models, and the students’ achievement using TPS-S model was the same as those using PBL-S model; 4. In learning mathematics using GI-S model, the students with high, medium, and low level creativity gave the same achivement. In using TPS-S model, the students with high, medium, and low level creativity gave the same achievement. In using PBL-S, the students with high level creativity had the same achievement as those who had medium and low level creativity, but the students with medium level creativity gave better achievement than those who had low level creativity.Keywords: Group Investigation (GI), Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Based Learning (PBL), Scientific approach, Creativity
Co-Authors Dewi Retno Sari Saputro Imam Sujadi Mardiyana Mardiyana Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi