Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Dewi Retno Sari
Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Program Pascasarjana UNS
Mathematics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) PADA POKOK BAHASAN LIMIT FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA (Penelitian Dilaksanakan di SMA Dwi Winarni; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to know: (1) which one gives student better learning achievement, Numbered Heads Together learning process, Think Pair Share one  with Contextual Teaching and Learning, or conventional one, (2) which one having better learning achievement in mathematics, students who have the level of low  anxiety, medium one, or high one, (3) which level of anxiety in learning mathematics gives better learning achievements with Numbered Heads Together learning model, Think Pair Share one with Contextual Teaching and Learning approach one, or conventional one, (4) which learning model (Numbered Heads together, think pair share with contextual Teaching and Learning approach, or conventional) gives better learning achievement  in mathematics  toward the level of low anxiety, medium one , or high one.It was aquasi-experimentalstudy using twoindependent variables(model of learning andthe anxiety of learning mathematics) andonedependent variable(learning achievement of mathematics). The instruments used to collect the data were documentation,testing, andquestionnaires. Two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data. The sample-taking was done using Sratified Cluster Random Sampling.The results of theresearchare. (1) the learning achievement in Conventional learning model andNumberedHeads Together one areequally well, Think Pair Sharemodelis better thanconventionalone,whileNumberedHeads Togetherandthinkpair share are equally well, (2) the learning achievement in mathematics toward low anxiety and medium one are equally well, low-anxiety learning is better than  highanxiety, medium anxiety and highoneareequally well, (3) in NumberedHeads Together, Think Pair Share, andconventional model, the learning achievement in mathematics toward low anxiety and medium one are equally well, low-anxiety is better than  highanxiety, medium anxiety and highoneareequally well, and (4) the learning achievement inlow, medium, andhigh anxietyat the learning achievement in Conventional learning model andNumberedHeads Together one areequally well, Think Pair Sharemodelis better thanconventionalone,whileNumberedHeads TogetherandThinkPair Share are equally well.   Keywords: Numbered Heads Together, Think Pair Share,Conventional  
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF GROUP INVESTIGATION(GI) DAN THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI DIMENSI TIGA DENGAN PENDEKATAN PMRI DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA Y Noenoek Andrijanti; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract:The purpose of this research are to know: 1) which one gives better achievement in mathematics, learning model of GI with IRME approach, learning model of TPS with IRME approach, or conventional learning model, 2) which one gives better achievement in mathematics, student who was high creativity, middle creativity, or low creativity, 3) for each category of student’s creativity (high, middle, and low), which one produces better achievement in mathematics, learning model of GI with IRME approach, learning model of TPS with IRME approach or conventional learning model. This research is quasi-experimental research with the research plan using factorial 3´3. The population of this research was all students in class X in SMA/MA Surakarta academic year 2012/2013. The sample-taking was done using stratified cluster random sampling.  The instrument which was applied to obtain the data of the research was test, questionnaires, and documentation. The test instrument was used to know the mathematics achievement on three- dimensional material. Hence, questionnaires instrument was used to know the student’s creativity. The questionnaires instrument includes content validity, internal consistency and reliability. The test instrument includes content validity, level of difficulty, different power and reliability. The  results of  the  research  are (1) GI type of cooperative learning model with IRME approach provides better learning achievement than the TPS type with IRME approach, conventional learning in mathematic learning in three dimension material. The TPS type of cooperative learning provides the learning achievement as good as the conventional learning did in three dimension material of mathematic learning, (2) the students with high creativity level have mathematic learning achievement as good as those with medium creativity level, the students with medium creativity level have mathematic learning achievement as good as those with low creativity level, and the students with high creativity level have mathematic learning achievement better than those with low creativity level, (3) at each creativity level, the GI type of cooperative learning model application with IRME provided learning achievement better than both TPS type with IRME and conventional learning did. The TPS type of learning model with IRME approach provided learning achievement as good as the conventional learning did in three dimension material of mathematic learning. Keywords:GIlearning model, TPS, IRME, creativity.
Co-Authors Budiyono Budiyono Dwi Winarni Y Noenoek Andrijanti