Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DIRGANTARA JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN
Mudemar A Rasyidi
Unknown Affiliation
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mechanical Engineering Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
FUNGSI HUKUM DI DALAM MASYARAKAT DAN PERANAN HUKUM BISNIS DI INDONESIA Mudemar A Rasyidi
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DIRGANTARA Vol 9, No 1 (2018): JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DIRGANTARA
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS DIRGANTARA MARSEKAL SURYADARMA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (757.25 KB) | DOI: 10.35968/jh.v9i1.301

Abstract

Kajian ini membahas tentang Fungsi Hukum di dalam masyarakat dan Peranan Hukum Bisnis di Indonesia. Di dalam kehidupannya manusia pada dasarnya melakukan hubungan sosial dan terjadilah interaksi sosial yang dapat menimbulkan atau mewujudkan jaringan-jaringan relasi-relasi sosial terhadap masyarakat lingkungannya atau disebut a Web of Social Relationship. Di dalam dinamika kehidupan ini setiap manusia / orang membutuhkan suatu kepastian untuk dapat mencapai tujuan agar berjalan dengan aman dan tertib. Oleh karena itu Fungsi Hukum didalam masyarakat sangat penting. Begitu pula ketika mereka melakukan upaya berbisnis. Karena bisnis itu akan menghitung tentang untung dan rugi, supaya tidak terjadi kekacauan maka Pemerintah membuat Undang-Undang atau Peraturan tentang bisnis di Indonesia, agar kegiatan tersebut dapat berjalan dengan lancar, tertib dan aman serta nyaman. Maka dibuatlah peraturan-peraturan diantaranya seperti Pasal 33 UUD 1945, UU No. 25/1992 tentang Perkoperasian, TAP MPR No. XVI/MPR/1998 tentang Politik Ekonomi dalam rangka Demokrasi Ekonomi, melalui Sidang Istimewa dan beberapa Undang-Undang atau Peraturan lainnya seperti UU RI No. 8/1995 tentang Pasar Modal, UU RI No. 40/2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (PT), UU RI No. 24/2002 tentang Surat Utang Negara, Peraturan BAPEPAM-LK, Peraturan Bursa Efek Indonesia (dh BEJ dan BES), Peraturan Kustodian Sentral Efek Indonesia (KSEI) dan Peraturan Kliring Penjaminan Efek Indonesia (KPEI), serta Peraturan-peraturan lainnya yang kesemuanya itu adalah sebagai pegangan bagi pelaku-pelaku bisnis di Indonesia agar menjadi jelas dan tegas, agar bisnis dapat dilakukan secara konsisten pada pelaksanaan operasionalnya di dalam masyarakat dan Negara RI. Keywords :      Be a Smart and Tough Nation in this World,
PERBAIKAN SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA MENUJU NEGARA HUKUM YANG BERKEADILAN Mudemar A Rasyidi
JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN Vol 10, No 2 (2019): JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN
Publisher : JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35968/jmm.v10i2.329

Abstract

Pancasila as the foundation of the state, and the way of view of the Indonesian nation and Pancasila as philosophy of Indonesia nation, and also as the ideology of the Unitary State Republic of Indonesia, should be able to be practiced consitently, in creative and dynamic manner by all walks of life of communities, in creative and dynamic manner by all walks of life of communities, and groups living and existing in the Indonesian society.Being increasingly consistent, creative and dynamic the Pancasila is to be observed to in reality of life, both by the state officials and the people, then the life of nation and state also would be better, professional then Indonesia will be move developed in order to achieve a just and prosperous society. Furthermore, if Indonesia nation increasingly deepens and comprehend and practice it in a pure and consequence manner, as well as adhering to the 1945 Constitution and all provisions, regulations as well as other legislations enforced in Indonesia the all of them would be very determining in carrying out the improvement in Indonesian Legal system towards a legal state with justice adjusted to the modern science and technology advancements.
Terorisme Tidak Identik Dengan Islam Mudemar A Rasyidi
JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN Vol 8, No 2 (2016): JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN
Publisher : JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35968/jmm.v8i2.517

Abstract

AbstractTerorism : is a criminal act, which is international, national and local in nature. Both organized and collectively / in groups, and individually. Both trained and untrained. Intentionally posing threats with violence and violent acts. With intention to commit a crime that may give rise to unrest, panic for a group of people, or many people, or bringing about fear or committing an act that may harm a group of people or many people, or resulting in insecurity for the people, by employing light weaponry or heavy weaponry or alutsista (mobilization of main defense equipment), or committing and act that may bring about damages against properties or neighborhood and public or committing an act thay may cause damages on private verhicle or public transportation or warfare equipmet, or homes / residences private owned or government owned, or damaging and/or destroying hospitals, official residences, offices, building owned by privates or owned by government, hotels, both owned by privates and owned by government, bringing about damages to or destroying private owned and government owned installations, damaging / destroying all types of equipments used for public or government, both civil and military. Or destroying properties, or occupying/taking over or seizing any thing or also causing casualities of properties or lives against the law. As well as committing acts that put resources at danger, nationally and internationally, on behalf of individuals, tribes, races, ethnics, groups, or religions. And the perpetrators can be charged with capital punishment or lifetime imprisonment, or sentences in jail minimin for 4 (four) years, and maximum for 20 (twenty) years. Keywords:         Holy Koran Nul-Karim, Al-Hadist, Islamic Law, Eradication of Criminal Act of Terorism Law (Law No. 15 of 2003 in conjunction with the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 1 of 2002) various sources Local, National and International in regard to Terrorism, and so forth.
PEMBARUAN HUKUM TENTANG EFEKTIVITAS PELAKSANAAN PIDANA DENDA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Mudemar A Rasyidi
JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN Vol 10, No 1 (2019): JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN
Publisher : JURNAL MITRA MANAJEMEN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35968/jmm.v10i1.290

Abstract

Corruption or criminal act of corruption is an act severely harms the State and may result in suffering to the people and as very immoral / wicked act even it violates the religious tenets, then it is worth for the perpetrator of the corruption crime to be severely punished, or to be subjected to the severe punishment. Even he/she may be imposed with penalty punishment. The penalty punishment is the key sentence as stipulated in Article 10 of the Criminal Procedure Law. In its development, the penalty punishment is applied in sentences outside the Criminal Procedures Law, one of them is in the Corruption Crime Law. In the Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with the Law Number 20 of 2001, regarding the Amendement on Law Number 31 of 1999, regarding Corruption Crime Eradication. Penalty punishment is the sentence cumulatively applied toward the perpetrators of the corruption crimes. In its implementation, the penalty punishment is difficult to be realized, the Prosecutor Office in enforcing the penalty punishment is hard to be fulfilled, if the Defendant chooses the Replacement Punishment for the Imprisonment, so the payment to the state’s treasury would not be fulfilled. As the consequence, the sense of justice for the sake of law is not achieved. This is due less decisive and clear regulation regarding the penalty punishment in the corruption crime, so it places the Judges and Prosecutors in difficult situation. Then it requires the decisive and appropriate enforcement of penalty punishment in the implementation of penalty sentence particularly in corruption crimes.
Co-Authors