Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

VERNAKULARISASI PEMAHAMAN HADIS (Refleksi Wacana Islam Nusantara) Muhammad Zubir; Mushallina Hilma
Islam Transformatif : Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 2, No 2 (2018): Juli - Desember 2018
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (797.539 KB) | DOI: 10.30983/it.v2i2.759

Abstract

The term vernacular is born because of an understanding of religious texts taking into account the conditions of the Indonesian Islamic community. This understanding is known as the context of the understanding of hadith which is an effort made by the ulama as one of ijtihad in examining the content of the hadith of the hadith. This is done if there is a hadith that appears to be incompatible with the condition of a society or a certain period of time. The hadith about the leader from the Quraysh tribe and the hadith about not going to succeed in a people if the leadership is left to women is an example of how difficult it is to be applied in Indonesia if it is only understood textually and not understood by a contextual approach. In Indonesia, many hadiths that require new explanations (syarah) in order to be able to uncover various biological essence, using language that is popular and in line with present-day logic, to make it easier to achieve goals. Therefore, Islamic scholars, especially in Indonesia are required to be ready to anticipate the emergence of actual problems that develop in society.
VERNAKULARISASI PEMAHAMAN HADIS (Refleksi Wacana Islam Nusantara) Muhammad Zubir; Mushallina Hilma
Islam Transformatif : Journal of Islamic Studies Vol 2, No 2 (2018): Juli - Desember 2018
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (797.683 KB) | DOI: 10.30983/it.v2i2.759

Abstract

The term vernacular is born because of an understanding of religious texts taking into account the conditions of the Indonesian Islamic community. This understanding is known as the context of the understanding of hadith which is an effort made by the ulama as one of ijtihad in examining the content of the hadith of the hadith. This is done if there is a hadith that appears to be incompatible with the condition of a society or a certain period of time. The hadith about the leader from the Quraysh tribe and the hadith about not going to succeed in a people if the leadership is left to women is an example of how difficult it is to be applied in Indonesia if it is only understood textually and not understood by a contextual approach. In Indonesia, many hadiths that require new explanations (syarah) in order to be able to uncover various biological essence, using language that is popular and in line with present-day logic, to make it easier to achieve goals. Therefore, Islamic scholars, especially in Indonesia are required to be ready to anticipate the emergence of actual problems that develop in society.
SUAMI PENJUDI SEBAGAI ALASAN FASAKH NIKAH(Analisa Komparatif Penalaran Hukum Fikih Syāfi’iyyah dan Pasal 116 KHI) Muhammad Zubir
Jurnal Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN EKONOMI ISLAM IAI ALMUSLIM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71025/nnpb1n63

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to see the concept of Syafi’iyyah Fiqh and Article 116 Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) on husband's gambling as a reason for divorce (fasakh) and to see the basic thinking of both. This type of thesis research is a qualitative research with a normative approach, namely research conducted by examining library materials related to legal issues in everyday people's life such as divorce (fasakh) and others. From this study the authors found that according to Syafi’iyyah Fiqh, a husband who gambles is not justified as one of the reasons for divorce (fasakh). Because they do not meet the conditions for divorce that have been determined such as disabilities and others. Unless gambling can neglect his obligations as a husband. This is different from Article 116 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), in which a husband who gambles can be used as an excuse for divorce (fasakh) because he does not see the consequences. The rationale for Syafi’iyyah Fiqh, in determining the gambler's husband as the reason for divorce is to follow the principles contained in the Shafi'i school of thought. Meanwhile, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI)  is based on previous government regulations. Namely, the Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 1975 concerning Implementation of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This difference is based on the number of sources adopted by the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) such as across the four schools and others. In addition, it is adapted to the conditions of the Indonesian nation. The goal is to be guided by one legal concept in making case decisions.
SUAMI PENJUDI SEBAGAI ALASAN FASAKH NIKAH(Analisa Komparatif Penalaran Hukum Fikih Syāfi’iyyah dan Pasal 116 KHI) Muhammad Zubir
Jurnal Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN EKONOMI ISLAM IAI ALMUSLIM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71025/nnpb1n63

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to see the concept of Syafi’iyyah Fiqh and Article 116 Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) on husband's gambling as a reason for divorce (fasakh) and to see the basic thinking of both. This type of thesis research is a qualitative research with a normative approach, namely research conducted by examining library materials related to legal issues in everyday people's life such as divorce (fasakh) and others. From this study the authors found that according to Syafi’iyyah Fiqh, a husband who gambles is not justified as one of the reasons for divorce (fasakh). Because they do not meet the conditions for divorce that have been determined such as disabilities and others. Unless gambling can neglect his obligations as a husband. This is different from Article 116 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), in which a husband who gambles can be used as an excuse for divorce (fasakh) because he does not see the consequences. The rationale for Syafi’iyyah Fiqh, in determining the gambler's husband as the reason for divorce is to follow the principles contained in the Shafi'i school of thought. Meanwhile, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI)  is based on previous government regulations. Namely, the Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 1975 concerning Implementation of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This difference is based on the number of sources adopted by the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) such as across the four schools and others. In addition, it is adapted to the conditions of the Indonesian nation. The goal is to be guided by one legal concept in making case decisions.