Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.233
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Melintas An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion Jurnal Filsafat Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Retorik: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya
Min Seong Kim
Sanata Dharma University
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Introducing Vol. 9 No. 2 Min Seong Kim
Retorik: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora Vol 9, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Sanata Dharma University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (268.642 KB) | DOI: 10.24071/ret.v9i2.4529

Abstract

Science and the Necessity of Faith: Notes on “Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic” Min Seong Kim
Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jfi.v4i3.39510

Abstract

Apropos Kant’s discussion of scientific practice in the section of the first Critique entitled “Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic,” there has long been a tendency in Anglophone Kant scholarship to downplay the role of God or quickly brush aside the centrality of the idea in the Kantian system. As a way of setting the stage for evaluating the place of God in Kant’s philosophy, this paper, in a concise and straightforward manner, attempts to make the connection between science and the idea of God as it appears in the first Critique explicit and explain why Kant is driven to make that connection. In the first half of the paper, I summarize Kant’s discussion of scientific practice as presented in the first part of the Appendix, followed by a brief discussion of a problem his account raises. In the second half of the paper, I elaborate the connection between science and God as a response to that problem.
To Believe in Historical Progress: On Axel Honneth’s Normative Grounding of Critique Min Seong Kim
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 32, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.73668

Abstract

One of the most ambitious contributions Axel Honneth has made to critical theory consists in his attempt to ground the normativity of critique beyond communicative reason—the normative ground of critique that had been proposed by Honneth’s predecessor at the Institut für Sozialforschung, Jürgen Habermas. Defending an affirmative stance toward historical progress is critical to Honneth’s project, which attempts to pursue the aspiration of the Frankfurt School to practice a robust form of immanent critique: for preserving the idea of progress allows Honneth to derive the validity of the underlying normative presuppositions of the existing social order, thereby securing the normative grounds of critique without relying on transcendent or transhistorical principles. Through a consideration of an aspect of the relation between universality and particularity that remains undertheorized in Honneth’s account, this essay attempts to question the success of his strategy for grounding the normativity of critique.
Introducing Vol. 10 No. 1 Min Seong Kim
Retorik: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora Vol 10, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Sanata Dharma University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24071/ret.v10i1.5154

Abstract

The many styles of Retorik: Introducing Vol. 10 No. 2 Min Seong Kim
Retorik: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora Vol 10, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Sanata Dharma University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24071/ret.v10i2.6168

Abstract

From adat revivalism to augmented realities: Introducing Vol. 11 No. 1 Min Seong Kim
Retorik: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora Vol 11, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Sanata Dharma University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24071/ret.v11i1.6585

Abstract

Posthumanism is Right in so far as Humanism is Not Human Enough: Introducing Vol. 11 No. 2 Min Seong Kim
Retorik: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora Vol 11, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Sanata Dharma University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24071/ret.v11i2.7885

Abstract

Alongside the “Anthropocene,” “posthuman” undoubtedly counts among the most prominent keywords of today’s academic discourses. Its increasing prominence in the Indonesian academia was reflected in the theme of the Sanata Dharma Berbagi conference held in October 2023. The title of the fifth edition of the ASLE-ASEAN Ecocritical Conference held in Chiang Rai, Thailand, just a month later, too, was “Posthuman Southeast Asia.” If the conference series had understandably close affinity with broadly posthumanist orientations from its inception, the title of the fifth iteration of the conference perhaps distinguished itself with its constative resonance, that Southeast Asia already is posthuman. The avenues for thought that the posthumanist wave clears, particularly in the Indonesian context wherein it represents advances beyond a myopic culturalism that so often constrains research in the humanities, deserve full intellectual attention from those in the field of cultural studies in the country. However, even though I myself have recently defended certain theoretical projects that are sometimes associated with posthumanism, I still remain hesitant to ride the wave of posthumanism at full speed. For I have also found myself wondering whether the great strides promised by posthumanism risk obfuscating alternative paths forward potentially opened by other lines of thought.
Wawancara dengan Taring Padi: Kepeloporan, Kreativitas, Simbol, dan Peristiwa Documenta Fifteen Heronimus Heron; Min Seong Kim
Retorik: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora Vol 11, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Sanata Dharma University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24071/ret.v11i2.7131

Abstract

A work by the Indonesian artist collective Taring Padi titled People’s Justice caused great controversy during the fifteenth edition of Documenta, which took place in Kassel in the year 2022. While discussions over the Documenta incident were still ongoing, on 19 September 2022, we were able to meet eight of the members of Taring Padi in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, to hear their thoughts on the controversy as well as gain insight into their creative process and political orientation. We publish the interview in full in Retorik with the permission of Taring Padi.
INSIDEN PENURUNAN BANNER PEOPLE’S JUSTICE DI DOCUMENTA FIFTEEN DAN PERINTANG KOMUNIKASI ANTARBUDAYA Heron, Heronimus; Kim, Min Seong
Paradigma: Jurnal Kajian Budaya Vol. 14, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

On June 20 2022, artists and art observers in Indonesia were shocked by the circulation of information that the People's Justice banner by Taring Padi exhibited at Documenta Fifteen interpreted as containing elements of antisemitism. Taring Padi explained that the People's Justice banner was based on the political history of Indonesia under New Order regime and had nothing to do with antisemitism, however, the banner was eventually dismantled on June 21, 2022. Based on this background, there are several research questions to explore: How is the chronology of dismantling the People's Justice banner at Documenta Fifteen? Why did this incident occur? What does Taring Padi need to do as a cultural agency? This research uses qualitative research methods with a critical discourse analysis approach. The results of this research found that the protests against two figures in the People's Justice banner due to two reasons: firstly, the unwillingness of the protesting parties to ask Taring Padi for confirmation and listen to Taring Padi's explanation. Secondly, Taring Padi's ignorance regarding practices considered antisemitism because knowledge about the history of antisemitism is uncommon in Indonesia. The People's Justice banner can be a medium for dialogue between fellow artists and the audience. However, this work has potential weaknesses because it depicts a gap in antagonism that narrows the interpretive space. This potential can be anticipated if the artist opens up a space for interpretation and the audience must be open, so that discursive encounters can be held to understand shared culture and social problems.
Saussure and the Political Potential of Language Kim, Min Seong
MELINTAS An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion (MIJPR) Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Philosophy, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/mel.v36i1.4678.1-23

Abstract

Although the linguistic theory of Ferdinand de Saussure is widely recognised as the forerunner of structuralism, it is often treated in the humanities and social sciences today as a stepping stone toward more sophisticated, generalised semiotics and theories of discourse. As a result, social and political implications of Saussure’s original conception of language have frequently been underestimated. Drawing from the classic lecture Course in General Linguistics and the fragmented notes collected in Writings in General Linguistics, this article offers a reconstruction of the social and political dimensions that were present, albeit in an inchoate form, within Saussure’s own theorisation. To act as a foil to the reconstructed Saussurean position, this article calls upon an essay that charts the historical development of the concept of discourse authored by Ernesto Laclau, who is perhaps the most politically oriented thinker among the many inheritors of the Saussurean legacy.
Co-Authors Heron, Heronimus Heronimus Heron